Jump to content

Pedro back. (Will he opt out?)


oriolesacox

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 385
  • Created
  • Last Reply
15 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Gentry, Tavarez and Mancini fighting for two spots to open the season with 14 position players.  Pedro does not change that.

Mancini isn't a factor at this point. Tell Orioles have made that obvious. For whatever reason. If they were convinced he was, they wouldn't have so many DH on this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Bourn isn't a fit. He is a LHbat with poor OBP and has been a poor fielder for the past few seasons. Gentry is a RHbat with better OBP and is a plus defender. He is a good RF platoon option if Kim doesn't hit LHP.

I'd rather keep Gentry over Bourn at this point in their careers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll believe Alvarez is actually going to the minors when he is sent there, not before. I am going to assume he will be on the major league roster until that day. He's being paid 2.5M with another possible 3.5M in incentives. I think he fully expects to be in the big leagues.

That would mean he or Trumbo puts on their outfield glove against RHP, and Smith or Kim lose all their value to the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

Mancini isn't a factor at this point. Tell Orioles have made that obvious. For whatever reason. If they were convinced he was, they wouldn't have so many DH on this team.

I don't see it like that.  Mancini has an option and is having a good spring. He can be the 14th position player to start the season and be sent down when the 5th starter is  needs.  Pedro can't do that.  If Pedro makes the team he has to stay.   But Pedro is on a minor league contract and is unlikely to make the team out of ST.

Mancini has options, is cheap, and is having a good spring.  That separate him from the veterans on minor league contracts.  He can go up and down whenever Buck needs.  Buck loves that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Gentry, Tavarez and Mancini fighting for two spots to open the season with 14 position players.  Pedro does not change that.

As of now the team would have Kim/Rickard in LF, Smith/Gentry, RF, Trumbo DH. The others will have to really impress to land a spot. Don't see how Pedro fits any were except as insurance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I don't see it like that.  Mancini has an option and is having a good spring. He can be the 14th position player to start the season and be sent down when the 5th starter is  needs.  Pedro can't do that.  If Pedro makes the team he has to stay.   But Pedro is on a minor league contract and is unlikely to make the team out of ST.

Mancini has options, is cheap, and is having a good spring.  That separate him from the veterans on minor league contracts.  He can go up and down whenever Buck needs.  Buck loves that.

I was talking strictly as an option on the 25. Not in the organization as a whole. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Babypowder said:

I'll believe Alvarez is actually going to the minors when he is sent there, not before. I am going to assume he will be on the major league roster until that day. He's being paid 2.5M with another possible 3.5M in incentives. I think he fully expects to be in the big leagues.

That would mean he or Trumbo puts on their outfield glove against RHP, and Smith or Kim lose all their value to the team.

Pedro has the same contract as Bourn.  Minor league.  2M if he makes the majors with 3.5M in incentives.  Both probably make a couple of hundred thousand  in the minors.   Bourn has a opt out on March 24th but he is injured so he unlikely to opt out.   Pedro will be in Norfolk learning to play the outfield.

Dan is doing Boras and Pedro a favor.  He is giving Pedro a spot in the minors to show he can learn to play the outfield.  If Pedro is successful in the outfield it expands his market, which he apparently needs badly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I don't see it like that.  Mancini has an option and is having a good spring. He can be the 14th position player to start the season and be sent down when the 5th starter is  needs.  Pedro can't do that.  If Pedro makes the team he has to stay.   But Pedro is on a minor league contract and is unlikely to make the team out of ST.

Mancini has options, is cheap, and is having a good spring.  That separate him from the veterans on minor league contracts.  He can go up and down whenever Buck needs.  Buck loves that.

Agreed. Also, I don't see the hand-wringing over Mancini since Dariel Alvarez is no longer a Norfolk outfielder since he's being converted to pitcher. It's not like the scenario for Mancini is that much different than a week ago when Dariel was still slotted as a Norfolk outfielder. I think the OF play for Pedro will be sporadic and he'll be DHing more in spite of the Heyman tweet. I feel pretty sure Mancini will see time in Baltimore when he's needed (injuries or poor production or future DFAs ahead of him on the ML team).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

As of now the team would have Kim/Rickard in LF, Smith/Gentry, RF, Trumbo DH. The others will have to really impress to land a spot. Don't see how Pedro fits any were except as insurance.

Right.   I think Buck likes Gentry's defense.  But he is on a minor league contract.  And Dan is still adding players.  Its hard to know how this works out. But I agree that is a likely scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Pedro has the same contract as Bourn.  Minor league.  2M if he makes the majors with 3.5M in incentives.  Both probably make a couple of hundred thousand  in the minors.   Bourn has a opt out on March 24th but he is injured so he unlikely to opt out.   Pedro will be in Norfolk learning to play the outfield.

Dan is doing Boras and Pedro a favor.  He is giving Pedro a spot in the minors to show he can learn to play the outfield.  If Pedro is successful in the outfield it expands his market, which he apparently needs badly.

If Bourn doesn't get hurt, he's on the ML roster too, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

Alvarez won't be in the OF. I don't care what they say. As bad as Trumbo is in the field, he atleast has experience out there. Makes no sense to replace an experienced bad OF with an unexperienced bad OF.

But how do you know he'll be a bad outfielder? As I noted previously, he never had any problem with popups or short fly balls when he played third base. Nor were his instincts a problem. His problem was throwing the ball to first base. It's entirely possible he may be able to catch fly balls and hit the cutoff man effectively. If that's the case, it's just a matter of seeing whether or not he has adequate instincts and then giving him some experience. He's more mobile than Trumbo. So what harm does it do to give him a shot on a minor league deal? It's not like they're planning to take him to Baltimore on Opening Day and stick him in left field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...