Jump to content

Yahoo Writer Has O's Picking T.Beckham


Recommended Posts

Don't waste the fourth pick on some damn high school kid who w/take 5 years to get up here-if he ever does. Total stupidity.

I don't agree with the simplistic and caustic style of your post, but I agree with the message, aside from the total stupidity part.

You look at...Snyder, Rowell, Wieters. Based on our lack of success with HSers, it's kind of obvious as to which direction.

And before someone jumps all over me for putting Rowell down, I'm not. I'm simply pointing out that he's not exactly tearing it up like Wieters is. And I realize there's an age difference there, but I'd prefer not to have to do much guess work and go with someone who's on a Wieters level. Smoak is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with the simplistic and caustic style of your post, but I agree with the message, aside from the total stupidity part.

You look at...Snyder, Rowell, Wieters. Based on our lack of success with HSers, it's kind of obvious as to which direction.

And before someone jumps all over me for putting Rowell down, I'm not. I'm simply pointing out that he's not exactly tearing it up like Wieters is. And I realize there's an age difference there, but I'd prefer not to have to do much guess work and go with someone who's on a Wieters level. Smoak is.

Other teams feeling this way is the only way Beckham falls to #4 in the first place. Where do we draw the line? If we were picking 5th or 6th would it be easier to take the HSer? I think we have to rely on scouting on this one.

I do agree that a Hser should have to show seriously Uber-Prospect tools and production against good talent to warrant selection this high over very productive college players. According to many scouting reports that I have read posted here, this kid qualifies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody remind me what college Cal Ripken, Jr. attended. I know full well he wasn't a first round choice, but he ended up quite well despite having no college experience. Juston Upton was drafted out of high school in 2005 and made the majors in 2007, so there are exceptions to the rule. The key should be to take the best player, regardless of position.

FWIW, the subject of this topic is at least the second writer that has the O's selecting Beckham

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Mauer

Prince Fielder

Clayton Kershaw

Jay Bruce

and on and on and on....

Believe me both Beckham and Hosmer are among the very best and surest picks in this draft. I've seen them both play. To make a blanket statement that high school picks are stupid reflects a good deal of ignorance. Just because Rowell and Snyder haven't panned out shouldn't deter us from high schoolers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody remind me what college Cal Ripken, Jr. attended. I know full well he wasn't a first round choice, but he ended up quite well despite having no college experience. Juston Upton was drafted out of high school in 2005 and made the majors in 2007, so there are exceptions to the rule. The key should be to take the best player, regardless of position.

FWIW, the subject of this topic is at least the second writer that has the O's selecting Beckham

Joe Mauer

Prince Fielder

Clayton Kershaw

Jay Bruce

and on and on and on....

Believe me both Beckham and Hosmer are among the very best and surest picks in this draft. I've seen them both play. To make a blanket statement that high school picks are stupid reflects a good deal of ignorance. Just because Rowell and Snyder haven't panned out shouldn't deter us from high schoolers...

I'm not saying high schoolers don't pan out, I'm saying the O's haven't had the best amount of luck in picking them in recent past. That makes me a bit wary of any HSer we take with the first pick.

I like Beckham and would be happy with him, I just like Smoak more. Or if we could somehow get Beckham and then Dykstra, that'd be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying high schoolers don't pan out, I'm saying the O's haven't had the best amount of luck in picking them in recent past. That makes me a bit wary of any HSer we take with the first pick.
I'd appreciate your concern a bit more if the same guy that had made those picks is the one making the pick this week.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't waste the fourth pick on some damn high school kid who w/take 5 years to get up here-if he ever does. Total stupidity.
This is a ridiculous opinion.

However, I don't think Tim Beckham will be there at #4, and we'll go with one of Smoak, Matusz, or Gordon Beckham (my preference in that order).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And before someone jumps all over me for putting Rowell down, I'm not. I'm simply pointing out that he's not exactly tearing it up like Wieters is. And I realize there's an age difference there, but I'd prefer not to have to do much guess work and go with someone who's on a Wieters level. Smoak is.
Smoak is not nearly on Wieters' level.

He may have a similar offensive upside as Wieters, but Wieters will be doing it behind the plate, Smoak will be at first base. Wieters is/was also a far safer bet to reach his upside.

I'd love to have him at #4, but he wouldn't be the coup that getting Wieters was (Alvarez might be, though, if he falls).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody remind me what college Cal Ripken, Jr. attended. I know full well he wasn't a first round choice, but he ended up quite well despite having no college experience. Juston Upton was drafted out of high school in 2005 and made the majors in 2007, so there are exceptions to the rule. The key should be to take the best player, regardless of position.

FWIW, the subject of this topic is at least the second writer that has the O's selecting Beckham

A more recent example is Jay Bruce -- he looks like he's turned out okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joe Mauer

Prince Fielder

Clayton Kershaw

Jay Bruce

and on and on and on....

Believe me both Beckham and Hosmer are among the very best and surest picks in this draft. I've seen them both play. To make a blanket statement that high school picks are stupid reflects a good deal of ignorance. Just because Rowell and Snyder haven't panned out shouldn't deter us from high schoolers...

Good point. :) It is silly to base this decision on just how former O's picks have performed. I'd rather have someone who'll be ready to play within 2 years, but if there's a significant difference in talent, then you go with Tim Beckham. But I wouldn't be upset with Gordon Beckham... or Smoak... or Hosmer. So, there are 2 Dykstras as well as 2 Beckhams. Are any of them related?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying high schoolers don't pan out, I'm saying the O's haven't had the best amount of luck in picking them in recent past. That makes me a bit wary of any HSer we take with the first pick.

Tim Beckham will be the first high schooler chosen in this draft. The first high schooler chosen, by year:

2007 Mike Moustakas

2006 Clayton Kershaw

2005 Justin Upton

2004 Matt Bush (signability pick)

2003 Delmon Young

2002 BJ Upton

2001 Joe Mauer

I'll take those chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • With a previous post in this thread I highlighted a selection of notable or memorable comps for our current Orioles. Now I wonder what it would look like to compare our best roster (from that selected list, in order of WAR) with the corresponding squad of not-all-stars.   Without further ado, here's our team alongside its historic counterparts: LF    Norby        Eugenio Suarez CF    Mullins        Kevin Kiermaier RF    Cowser        Ken Singleton 1B    Mayo        Bill Melton 2B    Holliday    Arky Vaughan SS    Ortiz        Jose Pagan 3B    Henderson    Bill Madlock C    Ruthschman    Ted Simmons DH    Westburg    Robby Thompson     Bench    Mateo        Greg Gagne     SP1    Bradish        Justin Verlander SP2    Kremer        Johnny Cueto SP3    Rodriguez    Jose Berrios SP4    Povich        Jarrod Washburn     SP5    Irvin        Scott McGregor RP1    Pham        Jeff Samardzija RP2    McDermott    Steve Renko RP3    Vespi        Graeme Lloyd RP4    Baker        Matt Albers Closer    Bautista    Trevor Hoffman Oddly enough, it's the starting rotation that appears the strength of our team of doppelgangers.
    • Regarding Cooper, he was a fantastic pitching coach for a long time, but the game simply passed him by.  Near the end of his tenure, after a tough season Giolito actually went and worked with Ethan Katz (our current pitching coach and his former HS pitching coach) and he came back new and improved.  Katz also got a ton of credit for developing Cease and getting Rodon to finally tap into his potential. A year ago I would have been high on Katz, but last year was such a disaster that I’m not sure what to think.  It’s clear he’s got a much more modern take on pitching than Cooper, but I also think the org in general is so behind the times when it comes analytics & biometrics that there is only so much he can do.  We don’t have a single voice driving an org wide pitching philosophy (which is evident in our PD system) or much of a pitching lab to get the most out of guys.  Hopefully that will change for the better with the addition of Brian Bannister. All that being said, I don’t believe for a second we get all we can out of our guys.  Katz obviously helped Giolito, Cease, & Rodon improve but these were all elite prospects acquired from other orgs.  We still struggle to unlock the next tier of guys, although I blame that on broader organizational issues than purely Katz.
    • I love this.  Most fans that go to the game live within 45 minutes of the ballpark I would suspect.  The good thing is you can get home by 10:00 most evenings.  
    • I selfishly don't like it, I'm a displaced fan in the central time zone.  5:30 weeknight start times are rough for me, the games are usually over before I get home from the office.  But they should make decisions based on the people who might actually go to the games. 
    • That's something that can only be determined in hindsight.  Lots of options and lots of flexibility this offseason to really set the team up for the next 2-3 years.  I'm very curious to see how it plays out.  Checking my crystal ball, I don't see Aroldis Chapman anywhere on the program
    • I agree and I don't want him on the team.  But I'm not sure this specific moment is more critical than say, when he picked Gunnar Henderson in the second round.
    • Perhaps he looked and doesn’t have the dough to spend or wants to part with the asking price for Cease or 1 year of the other guys rumored available. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...