Jump to content

Should Orioles Convert Kevin Gausman To A Reliever?


PressBoxOnline

Recommended Posts

Gausman had an ERA+ of 119 as a starter last year. Rhodes had ERA+'s of 77, 87, and 69 as a starter for three years before the O's made the switch. No way would I permanently move him to the bullpen now. If he continues to stink, then they may want to move him there temporarily to work on something/have some single innings of success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope and nope.  You can't cut bait, you can't trade him his value is too low.  You only convert him if you need value and only at the end of the contol period for him. That's still a year and a half away.  Players have terrible half seasons.  It happens.  Just as players have otherworldly half seasons (see Story, Trevor).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We converted him to a reliever in 2014 because we had a MLB need and that's likely why he never developed as a SP.   

Is that why David Price never made it? How about the times when Gausman has been successful?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.  God no.  Where's that Steve Carrell video from the office?  It's way too early for that.  You don't give up on a possible #2/#2 SP after two bad months.  Especially after what we all say in the 2nd half last year.  Let.  Him.  Pitch.  And hopefully McDowell can earn his money and help him figure out what has gone wrong mechanically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm surprised about how many are giving up on Gausman's career as a SP already. Yes, he has been totally and absolutely terrible this year. But from 2014-2016 he had a 3.77 ERA in almost 70 starts. I'll take that as a truer indication of his talent than his 14 starts so far this year. 

If he continues as badly as he's been so far then we'll probably be out of contention, and at that point maybe he could use a temporary bullpen break to try to sort everything out. But if you trade him for nothing or send him to the bullpen for good, you're squandering what could be (and was as recently as two months ago) one of our most valuable assets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, birdwatcher55 said:

You really think Gausman is #2 material? He reminds me of Jeremy Guthrie. I wouldn't waste any more time with him after 5 years.

Yeah, I do.  Btw, I mis-typed, I meant to put #2/#3.  But yeah, I think he can he a top end starter.  Did you not see him pitch last year in the 2nd half?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Gausman's best role is probably in relief since he doesn't have a good breaking pitch, but considering the options right now, you have to leave him in the rotation and hope he snaps out of it!

Exactly.  If we can keep Ubaldo in the starting rotation for 3 years, we can sure as heck keep Gausman in the rotation.  Maybe he needs to take up Pilates.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...