Jump to content

Time to start talking the f word


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, JohnD said:

You sure?  Kevin Gausman was a top 5 draft pick.

That puts a lot of faith in a scouting department that has a lot of swings and misses.

Wieters, Machado, Bundy. Not all of the O's first round draft choices of the last ten years have been busts or did not develop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, JohnD said:

Yea but the first round also had the likes of Addison Russell and Corey Seager.

Sure it's a crapshoot, but the Orioles hit far less frequently on a year to year basis. If they decide to tank, tell me how confident you are that they won't miss like they did in 1999 and end up losing 90-95 games with a farm system devoid of any help?

1999 is completely irrelevant in judging the Orioles. The O's organization is not Syd Thrift bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

The current regime has never tried to rebuild.

To a certain extent teams are always rebuilding and replenishing talent.  That's why there is a 50 round draft.  You don't neef to tear it all apart at the big league level before you draft good young players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

Wieters, Machado, Bundy. Not all of the O's first round draft choices of the last ten years have been busts or did not develop. 

None of them drafted by the current front office.  And all are in their sixth year at least in the organization.  If not having moved on as a FA.  Tell me about the impact players drafted since then.  Anyone who is projecting as a regular big leaguer, much less an All Star who can be built around by a playoff team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JohnD said:

None of them drafted by the current front office.  And all are in their sixth year at least in the organization.  If not having moved on as a FA.  Tell me about the impact players drafted since then.  Anyone who is projecting as a regular big leaguer, much less an All Star who can be built around by a playoff team?

Ummm, Kevin Gausman as of March 2017.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JohnD said:

What position is he playing in Baltimore?  And how many All Star games?

Darn, I was really trying to keep my fortune telling powers to myself.........but you got me.

He'll play 3rd and make 12 All Star games.  You're welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aglets said:

Darn, I was really trying to keep my fortune telling powers to myself.........but you got me.

He'll play 3rd and make 12 All Star games.  You're welcome.

Unless a guy is a phenom they don't count for John, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FlipTheBird said:

Unless a guy is a phenom they don't count for John, I guess.

Not to mention the original criteria he asked for was a 'regular major leaguer.'

Look, I don't think anyone is going to look at our system and say it's just busting with talent.  That's a real problem, and Dan definitely deserves a good bit of blame for that.  And we've also won more games than anyone in our division since 2012 or w/e.   That's kind of a good thing.   If anyone can find a perfect GM out there that's never screwed anything up, I trust they would send the person's name to Angelos and Co. asap.

I may become much more critical of Dan when we see how he handles this upcoming trade deadline though.......curious to see what his approach will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Not to mention the original criteria he asked for was a 'regular major leaguer.'

Look, I don't think anyone is going to look at our system and say it's just busting with talent.  That's a real problem, and Dan definitely deserves a good bit of blame for that.  And we've also won more games than anyone in our division since 2012 or w/e.   That's kind of a good thing.   If anyone can find a perfect GM out there that's never screwed anything up, I trust they would send the person's name to Angelos and Co. asap.

I may become much more critical of Dan when we see how he handles this upcoming trade deadline though.......curious to see what his approach will be.

Honestly I pretty much agree with everything here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, birdwatcher55 said:

I'd rather hope he does nothing and is canned at the end of the season. I would be very happy with that scenario.

In the very unlikely event that ownership opts for a significant rebuilt I'm sure you'll get your wish.  As others have pointed out, it wouldn't make sense otherwise.

A far more interesting scenario for me would be 5-year extensions for both Duquette and Showalter.  It would require transitioning to a sustainable organizational approach and I'm not convinced that Duquette is as one dimensional as many here seem to.  I think he would be up to the job.  Besides, I like success.  It's grown on me.

If I have to predict, I'll predict Duquette's out of Baltimore without a single look back roughly one minute after his contract expires.  He's proven all he needs to prove to be a highly sought after commodity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...