Jump to content

Projected Orioles Opening Day Payroll 2018


AZRon

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I agree it’s not rational to cut payroll (thus not signing any decent pitchers) and keep Manny.   But it won’t surprise me if that’s exactly what they do.

I agree it could turn out that way.   But not because they want it to go that way and not because they want to cut payroll.    

I want the O's to sign Cashner, Vargas and Tillman.  That would take a lot of payroll if the incentives for Tillman are included.   But I only give the O's a 20% chance of being able to convince those three to sign with them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I agree it could turn out that way.   But not because they want it to go that way and not because they want to cut payroll.    

I want the O's to sign Cashner, Vargas and Tillman.  That would take a lot of payroll if the incentives for Tillman are included.   But I only give the O's a 20% chance of being able to convince those three to sign with them.

With Cashner, Vargas and Tillman in the rotation, the O's should finish no worse than 5th place in the AL East.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I don't no why you would think that this is the year that Peter would cut payroll if Manny stays.  Peter still wants to win  and would be keeping the team together.  The only reason I see the payroll being cut is if Dan can not convince the FA starters to come to the Orioles.  That is always a possibility.

If that was the plan payroll should be increased next season after Manny stays.   Far better players available next year.  There are no players available on the FA market right now that would put the Orioles in contention.  Which is why it has been the best bet to retool now before next off season with a few trades.

 

On the bright side tons of money coming off the books heading into next off season, so if there is a payroll addition on top of the $$ from the contracts that we lose to free agency, things could be ok.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mdbdotcom said:

With Cashner, Vargas and Tillman in the rotation, the O's should finish no worse than 5th place in the AL East.

You see something better than that happening?  

Vargue won 18 game last year.  Cashner had a 3.40 ERA last year.  Tillman won 16 in 2016.   I am not saying that any of them will repeat those things but they start from a better place than others I think the O's might sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

You see something better than that happening?  

Vargue won 18 game last year.  Cashner had a 3.40 ERA last year.  Tillman won 16 in 2016.   I am not saying that any of them will repeat those things but they start from a better place than others I think the O's might sign.

Do I see anything better than that happening? No. But that doesn't mean I see this as very good, either. I'd rather spend less money on the rotation and trade Manny, Britton and Brach than sign these three hunks of lead. Just try to get ready for 2019 and let the kids play this year. Much more entertaining than trying to convince us that this team can contend. If they really want to contend, start by stepping up and signing Cobb. But we both know that won't happen. So, just take a mulligan on 2018 and forget about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

You see something better than that happening?  

Vargue won 18 game last year.  Cashner had a 3.40 ERA last year.  Tillman won 16 in 2016.   I am not saying that any of them will repeat those things but they start from a better place than others I think the O's might sign.

Its not that there is something better than that.  That might be the best 3 pitchers the Orioles can bring in, everything else considered.  Its that those 3 acquisitions tie up payroll and put us (still) in 4th place in the AL East, and thats if we have no setbacks, injuries, or slumps.  Our best case scenario is not much better by making those additions.  Why spend that money now on players that don't get us where we need to be ?   Win 68-72 games instead of 72-76 and have substantially more $ available heading into next off season when there are better players available.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Do I see anything better than that happening? No. But that doesn't mean I see this as very good, either. I'd rather spend less money on the rotation and trade Manny, Britton and Brach than sign these three hunks of lead. Just try to get ready for 2019 and let the kids play this year. Much more entertaining than trying to convince us that this team can contend. If they really want to contend, start by stepping up and signing Cobb. But we both know that won't happen. So, just take a mulligan on 2018 and forget about it.

You are ready to give up on 2018.  I don't think Peter is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, MikeAD said:

Its not that there is something better than that.  That might be the best 3 pitchers the Orioles can bring in, everything else considered.  Its that those 3 acquisitions tie up payroll and put us (still) in 4th place in the AL East, and thats if we have no setbacks, injuries, or slumps.  Our best case scenario is not much better by making those additions.  Why spend that money now on players that don't get us where we need to be ?   Win 68-72 games instead of 72-76 and have substantially more $ available heading into next off season when there are better players available.  

You seem to think you know what will happen during the season.  But the best scenario is BUndy and Gausman wining 16 each.  Tillman returns to form and winning 16.  Vargas winning 18.  and Cashner winning 11.  That is the best scenario.  It will not happen but we do not know what will happen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

You are ready to give up on 2018.  I don't think Peter is.

I'm ready to give up on 2018 if we are not going to get any better pitching than we had with Gallardo and Miley - both of whom had some decent stats before they showed up in Baltimore. And to me, signing those guys means that he has given up as well. He just might not realize it. 

BTW - It really makes me uncomfortable when you refer to Angelos by his first name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, wildcard said:

You seem to think you know what will happen during the season.  But the best scenario is BUndy and Gausman wining 16 each.  Tillman returns to form and winning 16.  Vargas winning 18.  and Cashner winning 11.  That is the best scenario.  It will not happen but we do not know what will happen.  

Even if it does happen, we'll still be in the gutter if Davis and Trumbo don't return to form. You keep ignoring the fact that our offense also took a steep downturn last year. And so did our defense. That team was bad in so many ways, adding three Hail Mary starter is not going to fix anything. 

If Angelos wants to win, it's time to buy some good pitching. Get in the game or go home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

I agree it could turn out that way.   But not because they want it to go that way and not because they want to cut payroll.    

I want the O's to sign Cashner, Vargas and Tillman.  That would take a lot of payroll if the incentives for Tillman are included.   But I only give the O's a 20% chance of being able to convince those three to sign with them.

Signings like that are exactly how they eased into 14 years of losing. Sometimes they have to make a tough short term decision in order for the long term. I don't think they will...but it is my hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Even if it does happen, we'll still be in the gutter if Davis and Trumbo don't return to form. You keep ignoring the fact that our offense also took a steep downturn last year. And so did our defense. That team was bad in so many ways, adding three Hail Mary starter is not going to fix anything. 

If Angelos wants to win, it's time to buy some good pitching. Get in the game or go home. 

You look at Davis and Trumbo and seem to project that they can do better than last year.   i don't know if that is true. Especially if we are talking about the best scenario.

We start with the history and attitude from O's management and probably  ownership that they will not spend big on pitching.  No five year and probably no 4 year contracts.  No getting into bidding war for top pitchers.

With that context  Dan has to thread a needle to try to get the best pitching the team can afford.   There is a small chance he can get any of the three guys I have mentioned.    We will know pretty soon what the O's will do.   Then it may be time to be negative on the season if Dan can't thread that needle.  But I hold out hope for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

It's just creepy. Like he's your friend or something. The thought of being his friend really creeps me out.

My baloney has a first name, Its Oscar.  My baloney has a second name its Meyer.  

Peter has been part on the O's fan consciousness since 1993.   When I say Peter most reads know actually who I am talking about .  It differentiates him from John or Lou who are also active with the O's.   I have never met the man.   Sorry you feel it is creepy but I doubt if it changes the way I refer to him.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I doubt Ortiz will have an 800+ OPS all year but I guess its possible. Right now the trade looks like a win for both teams. Milwaukee of course gets 5 more years after this to fully reap the benefits. 
    • Probably because of pitch count. Doesn’t change my point. 
    • Robert would be a significant upgrade over Mullins (offensively). Not sure how much of a difference the two have defensively. But as much as I like Mullins, he has been really bad with the bat in his hand for about a season now. Second half of last season and most of the first half of this season. Obviously the issue with Robert is his health/availability, so there would be risk there. But I wouldn't mind if Elias took a swing there, as long as this wouldn't be his only move. I would like to see Elias act bold and decisively this go round (at the deadline). I heard that the CHI SOX wanted a "Soto like" package (that the Nats got for trading him to the Pads) back for Robert. We know that they have a recent history of over asking on players they are in theory willing to trade. Anybody have a guess on what the realistic costs for Robert would be?
    • This is all correct. And to add to it, If Gunnar only continues being this version of Gunnar, he is out-valued only by the sole two-way player in baseball (Ohtani). So, comparing Soto to Gunnar in a vacuum might make some sense, their situations are vastly different. The closeness of the young guys has been well documented and we know that the group of Adley, Gunnar, Mountcastle, Stowers, Westy and Cowser are all strong in their faith. I do believe that will play some part in the contract finagling. I do not know any of them personally and with the union, the pressure of the sport, endorsements, etc. etc. ... I realize that at the end of the day guys are going to want what they are worth but I have long thought two things about this crop of players: they are incredibly consistent but they also seem to be genuinely good kids who want to win and put the team first. We don't know yet what will happen over the next few years with these players but I wouldn't be surprised to see a version of what the cast of Friends did early in the show's run, where they essentially formed their own union of sorts and structured their compensation so that none of them would become bigger than the sum of their parts. Again, I don't know them personally and I am fully in-tune with the idea that they all want to be paid but I think that their closeness means more to them than Soto's relationship with his teammates in Washington, and I think that holds true with respect to almost literally any other free agent in the history of the game. They are very unique in that they have this young group who are all 23 - 27 right now who are very tight. I happen to think that the stars of this team will be more inclined to consider more team-friendly deals if it means that their posse can stay in-tact for a longer duration of time. Call me naïve but that's how I see it. I've been intimately involved in the game at various levels myself and I can honestly say that I can't remember a group of young players who demonstrated a caring for each other to the same level of these kids. It could mean nothing when Gunnar is being thrown half a billion dollars or when Adley is offered the moon but I just don't see these players being as motivated by money as other (especially recent) stars.  I agree 100% that Gunnar would jump all over that Witt Jr. deal. I think he is smart enough to know that anything could happen over the next five years. Plus $288 million is a shitload of money. I don't know how  many generations of wealth that is but damn that's a lot of money for a soon to be 23 year old kid.   
    • There is a lot to like and I can't see why nobody would want him but for the possibility that he won't help the team much in October 2024, the cost would probably be an absurd ask.
    • I think the focus is going to be on relief pitching.   I don't think any of the guys SG listed would be needed for the types of relievers the O's will be going after.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...