Jump to content

Paul, how about a positive article on the future


wildcard

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, weams said:

In fact, if you asked other organizations which of Mullins, Hays or Mountcastle they would take in a trade now - I bet it is split between Hays and Mountcastle.  They love you until you fail. 

Maybe but the O's should not be trading away their young talent.  They should be collecting more young talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Maybe but the O's should not be trading away their young talent.  They should be collecting more young talent.

I agree with you. But don't think that any of those other position players are currently more valuable than Mountcastle. You will be on the dissenting end of the argument. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

So inform me.   You are right.  I have not seen Mountcastle play.  But what I have read is that he has a weak arm and the move to 3B is not going very well on throws where a strong arm is needed.   I am not hearing that his arm is erratic.  Its just weak which will probably keep him from being good at 3B in the majors where the game is faster.

 

He has an erratic arm. I've watched him miss a lot like Pedro. And he has a timing issue with his release. His arm may very well not play at third. But it's not because his are is so weak. I don't see him as a strong defender anywhere. But there have been plenty of major leaguers who are bat first. And it's a bat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

And they will both be here for the entirety of Spring Training.

Cashner coming a few weeks prior to Opening Day this season probably only hurt him in one start (his first), 

 

o

Cashner signed on February 15th.  Saying that it had any impact on even his first start is ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

And they will both be here for the entirety of Spring Training.

Cashner coming a few weeks prior to Opening Day this season probably only hurt him in one start (his first), but Cobb took about 4 or 5 starts to start pitching (at least) reasonably well because he was signed at the last minute.

 

o

 

 

54 minutes ago, POR said:

 

Cashner signed on February 15th.  Saying that it had any impact on even his first start is ridiculous. 

 

o

 

Cashner had 3 weeks of Spring Training, of which he made 2 starts (plus a short 3rd start against AAA-Norfolk.)

A full Spring Training is 6 weeks, and starting pitchers usually have 5 or 6 starts.

So it's not ridiculous to make a correlation to one bad start for him to begin the season, and 3 or 4 bad starts to begin the season for Cobb (who had no Spring Training at all.)

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, wildcard said:

I got the point.  But I think you were too negative in the article about the future Orioles.   Negativity about the O's is everywhere with the way the O's are playing.  You are such a good writer,  I just wanted you to write about  the positives.   

The O's are going to have a lot of 25 man roster spots open as the season going on.  Manny, Britton, Brach and  Jones will probably be traded. Gentry,  Alvarez,  and Peterson  probably have no future with the O's.    40 man roster spots for Tillman, Sardinas and Rasmus also probably open up.  That is 10 spots on the  40 man roster that need to be filled by players that are currently on the O's farm or players that the O's acquire in trade.    I see a lot on movement happening this season.

That's sort of what I'm saying -- there could be a lot of roster spots to fill, but who's going to fill them this season? It's probably not going to be top prospects, other than perhaps a September cup of coffee. I'm looking forward to seeing Stewart and Mullins (assuming the latter comes up this year), along with whoever the O's might get in trades. But otherwise the in-house choices are more of the fringe/journeyman type players like Dosch, Melville, Wojciechowski, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, PaulFolk said:

That's sort of what I'm saying -- there could be a lot of roster spots to fill, but who's going to fill them this season? It's probably not going to be top prospects, other than perhaps a September cup of coffee. I'm looking forward to seeing Stewart and Mullins (assuming the latter comes up this year), along with whoever the O's might get in trades. But otherwise the in-house choices are more of the fringe/journeyman type players like Dosch, Melville, Wojciechowski, etc.

They say Stevie Wilkerson is back on the watch as well now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PaulFolk said:

That's sort of what I'm saying -- there could be a lot of roster spots to fill, but who's going to fill them this season? It's probably not going to be top prospects, other than perhaps a September cup of coffee. I'm looking forward to seeing Stewart and Mullins (assuming the latter comes up this year), along with whoever the O's might get in trades. But otherwise the in-house choices are more of the fringe/journeyman type players like Dosch, Melville, Wojciechowski, etc.

We don't know who comes back in trade.   Infielders are needed.   For now Beckham is probably the SS and Valencia/Peterson the 3B.  That is an issue for the off season if the O's don't find better replacements in the mid season trades.

Britton and Brach will be replaced from the O's system.   Scott and Hart get called up to help  Givens, O'Day, Bleier, Castro, Wright.    Yacabonis is improving and may see some major league outings.   Akins and Harvey may get call ups in September.

Stewart and Mullins get call ups to help replace the Adam defensively and offensively.   Santander and  Hays may see September call ups.

That is the way it might go.  But there will hopefully be new players added in trades that boost the O's future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OFFNY said:

 

 

o

 

Cashner had 3 weeks of Spring Training, of which he made 2 starts (plus a short 3rd start against AAA-Norfolk.)

A full Spring Training is 6 weeks, and starting pitchers usually have 5 or 6 starts.

So it's not ridiculous to make a correlation to one bad start for him to begin the season, and 3 or 4 bad starts to begin the season for Cobb (who had no Spring Training at all.)

 

o

Pitchers and catchers had their first workout on February 14th.  Cashner signed on February 15th.  No idea where you are getting three weeks of spring training.  Buck played his silly games of pitching with hiding Cashner in intra squad and minor league games but he had a full spring training.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, POR said:

 

Pitchers and catchers had their first workout on February 14th. Cashner signed on February 15th. I have no idea where you are getting three weeks of spring training. Buck played his silly games of pitching with hiding Cashner in intra squad and minor league games, but he had a full spring training.

 

o

 

OK, my bad.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • What about the Rays? I know it’s hard to trade in division. They need offense and you could kill 2 birds with one stone. Zach Efflin and Jason Adam would solve both starter and bullpen issues. Rays may be extra incentivized to get rid of Efflin contract.
    • Let’s be clear. He’s pitching like an ace THIS YEAR. this is his first year in mlb and he was considered a back end starter when he was signed.  No one rational would say a 2.5 month performance in your first year in MLB requires the number one prospect in baseball PLUS MORE! Respectfully it’s lunacy.
    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
    • They are not in a rebuild. And I don't want to waste time imagining that the team is bad and trading our best young players. As a matter of fact, I hope we don't have to do that for years to come. I envision adding good players not how can we get rid of the good ones that we have. I have waited my whole life to finally have a team this good. I don't mind at all trading good prospects. And have no delusional expectations that we can get value without surrendering value. Nor am I in love with the notion that we have to have a cheap, homegrown team. As a matter of fact, I want and expect the org to spend much more money on payroll than it is doing currently. Lastly, what happened with Gausman is in the past and under a totally different administration (ownership + front office). We were selling then. We are buying now.
    • Is there a reason it should be? He’s still walking 5.5+ batters per 9. He’s still got things he can work on. No rush to get him up unless it’s as a reliever down the stretch or a spot start. 
    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...