Jump to content

MLB Pipeline: Rutschman's rank if draft in 2018


justcompete

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 hours ago, Frobby said:

He didn’t really miss on Aiken — that was a medical thing he couldn’t possibly have known.   In any event he made up for it with the Bregman pick the next year at no. 2.    

You do raise a good point, though — no matter how good your methodology, you’re going to miss on some high picks.    But over time, if the methodology is good, you’ll be ahead of the game.   

He was lucky that Aiken didn't take the clubs offer.  If he did then they would have never gotten Bregman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Frobby said:

All I have ever said was that we should wait until June to make the judgment.    It bothered me that many people were just assuming that Witt was the obvious, no-brainer choice, when he and everyone else still had a full season of baseball left to play before those decisions would be made.   Gun to my head, if we had to choose today, I’d draft Rutschman — but we don’t have to choose today.    If things unfold over the next 4+ months that make Elias choose Witt — or someone else entirely — fine by me.    It just seemed like the Witt love from certain posters was way over the top.    It’s kind of ironic how, as the offseason has progressed, Witt has fallen out of favor and now people are all over Rutschman.   He may be the guy we’d pick today, but things can change.

I love everything I've seen from Rutschman. And he LOOKS the part, too. After watching a good deal of Youtube on Witt... it became obvious within about 30 seconds that my untrained eye couldn't understand what all the fuss was about. It was humbling, actually. Because I know very smart baseball people think he's the second coming... 

I'd love to watch a video with overlay from a pro scout, showing me exactly why Witt's so great. Is it an overall athleticism thing? His movement? What? How is he THAT projectable? 

I dunno. I can say I'm enjoying these discussions more than "are we going to sign Cashner?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/31/2019 at 11:20 AM, NCRaven said:

Really hoping they take Rutschman at 1-1.  I think there could still be a good HS shortstops available at our comp pick.

Grow the bats. Buy the arms. That’s sort of what HOU did. There seems to be less risk in position players. All things considered. You can then stockpile your position players and trade for SP when the time comes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I'm glad it's all about reverence for valued members of the team instead of trying to win.  Mullins has been terrible offensively and should see some serious bench time until he starts hitting at least some.
    • When Markakis was Beavers’ age he was putting up a .799 OPS in the majors.  
    • But Mountcastle probably wasn't going to ever get up to tie it...I mean, maybe he would have, but after Gunnar you had Adley who was going to hit lefty, then you had lefty O'Hearn.  And then Tony who was gonna hit lefty if he had a chance to hit had the game not been decided yet.   So because Hyde was a slave to the righty/lefty matchup, he left his best bat on the bench.  And he would have for the rest of the inning had things gone differently.  He wouldn't pinch hit for Westy.  He probably wouldn't pinch hit for Cowser.  You'd have to wait until extra innings when Hays, Mullins and Mateo got up to bat to find a spot to put Mounty in there, so why not just do it in the 9th somewhere? I don't consider Stowers a viable bench bat in that situation.  I can see why some would, I just don't see it right now.  125 at bats in the majors, 43 strikeouts, and 8 walks.   Mateo...not a good hitter overall, but has been surprisingly decent lately.  And you want to get him on base because of his speed, he can score from first.  I don't see how Stowers for him is a great swap...but like Mullins being so bad, I don't think Stowers had much of a chance right there despite being a lefty.  Stowers hasn't flashed much at all in his time in the big leagues...now part of that is because he hasn't received consistent playing time but that's another debate for another thread. Getting back to Mullins being an automatic out, I'd have preferred to see Stowers hit for Mullins if Hyde was so hell bent on getting Stowers in there.  I'd have let Mateo take his chances. I'm not comping Mateo and Mullins offensively.  What I am saying is that I don't think Hyde wanted to pinch hit for Mullins in that spot because he's a veteran leader on the team and he doesn't want to show that he doesn't have confidence in him....despite Mullins having given every reason to not have confidence in him for awhile now. I'm saying that Mateo, despite being a severely flawed offensive player, has been a relatively important part of the team these past couple years and he's done everything he's been asked to do with a smile on his face.  Stowers for Mateo, even though it was the right move from a matchup perspective wasn't a good move for political/clubhouse reasons.  Pinch hitting someone who's barely broken his rookie status for a vet like Mateo?  I dunno, I didn't like it.    
    • There are a lot of bad teams in the league like @eddie83 mentioned and I have to think one of them will take a flyer on Baumann. I'd prefer he slip through waivers because there's a decent chance we could use him as a mop up pitcher later this summer.
    • I’d take that. 
    • Agreed on all but the 2030 timeline. Clear evidence for all to see, on every pitch, is unsustainable at this rate. With improvements in the tech, a solution must come sooner. 
    • Cal is only going to be around for public relations with the fans. Elias isn't going to put up with Cal trying to interfere with baseball operations and I don't see Rubenstein listening to Cal's input on how to run the team like we did with Brady Anderson and the Angelos family.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...