Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

I still wonder from the tone of that article whether he might just hang it all up or could be enticed to do so.  I think this is what the Orioles should pursue: 

"Listen Chris, we sense you've had enough.  Enough of feeling low, not performing how you'd like to... let us buy you out.  You can take a year or two and figure things out on your own.  And if you want to make a comeback after that, you'll be free to do so.  How does $_____________ sound.  We wish you all the best."

What's the number?  Would he consider anything or would he come back for more punishment - so to speak.  It obviously is draining him.

 

54 minutes ago, 24fps said:

Do you think the O's will keep him on the roster for the entire duration of his contract if he keeps playing at this level?  I don't.  So who blinks first?  CD's guaranteed the the entire amount on his contract, all he has to do is show up for work when required.  I think the O's cut him by the AS break next season unless he drastically improves.

 

50 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

To above replacement level?

I have a hard time seeing them eat that kind of money, even if it is an obvious sunk cost.

CoC, I can see them dumping him, but I don't disagree that the organization would find it difficult.  But I do like the who blinks first question raised, altho, Davis has most "hand" in that.

But I'm still wondering what dollar amount would it take for CD to take the buyout.  He sounds DONE from reading article.  So that's being the case, if he walks away, he gets nothing more because he hasn't fulfilled the contract.  But if he wants to go because he is done, how much would be a reasonable offer to get him to accept so he's gone?  That's what I'm interested in finding out what people think. 

I guess the assumption that would have to be made by others is that he is as miserable as he seems in the article and all it would take is a nudge to push him into accepting a buyout.  How much of a nudge then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

To above replacement level?

I have a hard time seeing them eat that kind of money, even if it is an obvious sunk cost.

Replacement level would be where the decision for the O's gets interesting IMO.  I don't think a rebuilding club can have the Chris Davis story in the clubhouse day in and day out below that baseline.  Yeah, it will hurt financially, but I think a good business case can be made to write off the cost even at $23 million per rather that expect people to watch him play when it's clear he's severely overmatched.

By all means try the buyout, but I think restructuring the full obligation is likely to have more success if the deal gets altered at all.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, drjohnnyfeva said:

I still wonder from the tone of that article whether he might just hang it all up or could be enticed to do so.  I think this is what the Orioles should pursue: 

"Listen Chris, we sense you've had enough.  Enough of feeling low, not performing how you'd like to... let us buy you out.  You can take a year or two and figure things out on your own.  And if you want to make a comeback after that, you'll be free to do so.  How does $_____________ sound.  We wish you all the best."

What's the number?  Would he consider anything or would he come back for more punishment - so to speak.  It obviously is draining him.

No I don't think they should do that ... the Os should wait for Davis to come to them.   

Edited by GuidoSarducci
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the O's should still give him the 2.5 million or whatever each year until 2037 or whatever, starting in 2019 to walk away.  If they're going to waste that money on Tillman and Rasmus, a better spend would be to have Chris Davis NOT show up to spring training and not be on the team next year.   

Hell, Davis has more value at 2.5 million a year and not playing than he does being out there every day.  The Orioles are better giving Davis money not to play.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

35 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I think the O's should still give him the 2.5 million or whatever each year until 2037 or whatever, starting in 2019 to walk away.  If they're going to waste that money on Tillman and Rasmus, a better spend would be to have Chris Davis NOT show up to spring training and not be on the team next year.   

Hell, Davis has more value at 2.5 million a year and not playing than he does being out there every day.  The Orioles are better giving Davis money not to play.

This!  I was thinking the same thing.  Wonder if others are in agreement.  Not that it matters what we think. ;)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, SomethingMagicHappens said:

Ask him to politely retire & reach a financial settlement with him.

Or, have him injure something so that disability insurance kicks in & he can get paid to watch from his sofa.

Or, bat him 9th every night & shame him into retiring.  

Anything that gets him off the roster ASAP has to be considered.

If it comes to it, you don't play him at all with the exception of mop-up duty.  Davis has made $96 million in his career, he will be receiving deferred money from the Orioles, basically he has a choice assuming he cannot return to being a respectable ballplayer:

1.  Ride the bench the next four years, hardly playing and spending lots of time away from his family

2.  Accept a buyout and spend lots of time with his family

Either way he is set for life financially and his life style will not change unless he did something incredibly stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if having a new manager, who isn't Chris's longtime champion from his days in Texas, will affect him.   Buck had Chris's back, played him way more than he should have given his performance.   Could be very different with a new manager, especially if it's someone from outside the organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I wonder if having a new manager, who isn't Chris's longtime champion from his days in Texas, will affect him.   Buck had Chris's back, played him way more than he should have given his performance.   Could be very different with a new manager, especially if it's someone from outside the organization.

Now you have me worried a change is going to negatively impact his performance.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Now you have me worried a change is going to negatively impact his performance.

I was thinking more on the lines of being more willing to accept some sort of buyout and end his Oriole tenure if the new manager was more likely to bury him on the bench than Buck would have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Roch repeated again today that Chris Davis's contract went against the wishes of Dan Duquette.

"He [DD] wasn’t in favor of signing Chris Davis to a seven-year, $161 million contract, but it will go down in history as happening under his watch."

For me this is final confirmation. Roch knows. I'm not sure anything else matters -- who the manager is, who the GM is, what Brady's role is. As long as the Angelos Family meddles in the baseball decisions and as long as their is no clear chain of command, this organization is going to suffer. ?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Perhaps, I don't really know. Since my press credentials were not renewed after COVID, I don't really know the new announcers besides Brett Hollander, due his WBAL days. I knew Arnold a little bit from his Frederick time.  Either way, I don't get the impression that Melanie talks out of turn or doesn't know what she can or can't say. Perhaps she was talking to Hyde and he said something offhand like, "Maybe even Bautistsa will be ready by the playoffs." Who knows?  I've been in a lot of situations talking with players and coaches and I knew what I could or could not say and when it was appropriate to report something, even if it was from an "unnamed source." I'm fairly certain Melanie would not still have a job with the Orioles if she did not know this by now too. 
    • It's a little surprising she would go "off-script", so to speak, on MASN when Elias has denied any chance of Bautista pitching this year. But perhaps MASN folks have a little more freedom under Rubenstein. 
    • Well, they got some good starts from Bradish so we'll see if that helps them win the AL East. If they win it by a game or two you can say he had an impact on this season. Bradish could still be back by the end of 2025 if everything goes smoothly.
    • Not to turn this into a Melanie Newman thread again, but she's actually not too bad when she's doing the color part of the broadcast. She'll drop some meaningful statistical information occasionally and the other day she said something (can't remember exactly what it was) and I was like, "Hmm, not bad Melanie" in my head. The issue is she just too slow in describing the action and does not paint a good enough picture of where the balls are hit or the likely outcome.  An example would be something like this.  "He hits a skyball into the deep blue sky....(second of pause) the outfielder is going out for it but he won't get it. And Henderson is on second for a double. We don't know where, how far, or what the action was other than the ball was a skyball and the outfielder misses it. She'll then go back and explain in more detail what happened. I better call would be "Henderson lines a ball into deep right center, the center fielder is going over quickly but it's going to fall in, Henderson is rounding first, heading for second as the CF throws the ball in to the cut off as Henderson walks into second with a standup double." Now we have a much better picture of what happened in our minds.  Arnold gets too wordy at times too and sometimes gets behind but he's still better overall and has the best radio voice. Brett Hollander is the best at PBP in my opinion despite my "dislike" for him calling the Orioles "Baltimore" like an away/national announcer.      
    • I feel as though they bungled Bautista and Bradish’s injuries by delaying the inevitable. Because of those delays, it could be no Bautista until 2025 and no Bradish until 2026. 
    • I think it’s fair to ask if he’s getting much to hit. With all the walks, it certainly seems like teams are staying away from him, even more so than Mayo. Would be nice to get some real reports about what is going on down there.
    • I take it more as this is the talk behind the scenes and she just didn’t read the room well enough to know she wasn’t supposed to say anything.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...