Jump to content

Alex Wells 2019


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, jtschrei said:

Wells has been unreal -- only 2 HRs allowed and that WHIP. Last year in A-ball, he gave up 1 HR per every 7 innings. This year in AA, 1 HR per every 43 innings. I wonder what's changed? Just sample size and chance? Seems unlikely. 

Partly, it’s getting out of Harry Grove Stadium, which is very homer-friendly.   But there must be more to the story than that.   (Note: only 10 of the 19 homers hit off Wells last year came at Harry Grove.)

Wells’ ground ball rate is up (.91 GO/AO compared to .67 last year), but still, that HR rate is extremely low.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2019 at 9:06 AM, Tony-OH said:

I haven't done a full evaluation, but if I had a gun to my head right now, I'd go Lowther, Wells, Akin, Zimmerman.

Slightly different for me. I'd go Lowther, Akin, Wells, Zimmerman. I just really fear Wells' ML profile even with his awesome production this year. He will have to be pinpoint. 

I have no idea how you rank them against guys like Harvey though. It's production against stuff. At this point, I think I'd rather have Harvey than any of them even with his wild swings in effectiveness. I don't know. Maybe not Lowther. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MurphDogg said:
Pat
1:28
Thoughts on Alex Wells? I know I'm scouting the stat line, but he just keeps on keeping on. 1.95 ERA, 2.63 FIP at AA. Can a guy with that limited velocity be a GUY?
 
Keith Law
1:28
I think there's a chance he's a back-end starter - a very small chance, but I wouldn't say zero.

From Keith Law's chat today

 

What would Keith Law have thought of a AA Greg Maddux and his 92 mph heater?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HelenaEngineer said:

What would Keith Law have thought of a AA Greg Maddux and his 92 mph heater?

 

Probably that a 92 (actually 93) MPH FB was pretty good back in 1986.

 

What is it with people and their desire to revisionist history Maddux into someone that never had decent velocity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Probably that a 92 (actually 93) MPH FB was pretty good back in 1986.

 

What is it with people and their desire to revisionist history Maddux into someone that never had decent velocity?

Most of his career in Atlanta he was in the low 90s dipping to high 80s late in his Atlanta tenure. His K/9 innings in the minors were in the 6-7 range and mostly stayed right there in the majors. I get there are a ton of people without overpowering fastballs who aren't able to put people away and only a very few Greg Maddux types. I am not saying Wells is and have never even seen him pitch, but his stats look pretty Maddux like. Maddux was effective with the fastball because he changed speeds, located brilliantly and knew when and where to use it, not because he blew it by batters who were looking for it. I live in Atlanta and watched him pitch a ton of times. It seems that Wells has been able to do that for the most part at Aberdeen, Delmarva and Bowie. I'm not sure what changed between Frederick and Bowie. It would be nice to see it continue, but I am certainly not going to assume it won't because Keith Law said so. 2 HRs allowed in 87 innings doesn't happen by random luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, HelenaEngineer said:

Most of his career in Atlanta he was in the low 90s dipping to high 80s late in his Atlanta tenure. His K/9 innings in the minors were in the 6-7 range and mostly stayed right there in the majors. I get there are a ton of people without overpowering fastballs who aren't able to put people away and only a very few Greg Maddux types. I am not saying Wells is and have never even seen him pitch, but his stats look pretty Maddux like. Maddux was effective with the fastball because he changed speeds, located brilliantly and knew when and where to use it, not because he blew it by batters who were looking for it. I live in Atlanta and watched him pitch a ton of times. It seems that Wells has been able to do that for the most part at Aberdeen, Delmarva and Bowie. I'm not sure what changed between Frederick and Bowie. It would be nice to see it continue, but I am certainly not going to assume it won't because Keith Law said so. 2 HRs allowed in 87 innings doesn't happen by random luck.

You said AA.  Why are you mentioning his velocity at 37?  By the time he was 37 he had his own personal strike zone six inches wider than everyone else.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding Maddux, averaging 91-92 with double plus movement is a completely different animal than 88 with below average life regardless of the league-wide environment. Add in the about 3+ mph greater league average velocity now vs in Maddux’s day and the already huge gulf of fastball quality is even wider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Yeah. People forget the double plus movement, location and complimentary double plus change up. Velocity wasn’t Maddux’s Game.

But he wasn't Jamie Moyer out there either.  Particularly in his early years, he wasn't what you would call a soft tosser.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

But he wasn't Jamie Moyer out there either.  Particularly in his early years, he wasn't what you would call a soft tosser.

Definitely not, but velocity was not his calling card even when it was good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

Regarding Maddux, averaging 91-92 with double plus movement is a completely different animal than 88 with below average life regardless of the league-wide environment. Add in the about 3+ mph greater league average velocity now vs in Maddux’s day and the already huge gulf of fastball quality is even wider.

Based in no small part to the different ways the radar now measures mph versus how it did 10-15 years ago.  The gun is 3 mph faster today even though today’s gun is supposedly a more accurate measurement.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, HelenaEngineer said:

What would Keith Law have thought of a AA Greg Maddux and his 92 mph heater?

 

Frankly, for Law to say Wells has a chance to be a back end starter is about the most complimentary thing he’s said about any Orioles prospect all year.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

Frankly, for Law to say Wells has a chance to be a back end starter is about the most complimentary thing he’s said about any Orioles prospect all year.   

The only O's prospect he's been fairly complimentary about is DL Hall. Even with Rutschman, Law's said things like "he's not a generational prospect" and "definitely not on the level of Posey as a catching prospect."

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Saturday's game was epically bad and not the type of loss a team on the upswing into the playoffs would suffer and one that I certainly hate to witness. I couldn't watch most of the game Sunday, but I wouldn't DVR it and then peek at the score either, I don't think that I would ever watch if I knew the outcome of a game in advance. The surprise elation (Gunnar's bases loaded double) and the agony of the non-send and inability to hit a sac fly is what keeps me coming back, old fool that I am.
    • Predicting what the attendance will do next year is like predicting Hurrican season in January.  There are so many outside factors that it is just a guess.  How will they finish the year, how much will the spend in the offseason, how many corporations want to get ticket plans,   how is the economy in 6 months, how do they play next season what teams we play and when, will teams like Red Sox, Yankees and big draws play well.   I also think one of the biggest factors is what corporations want to sponsor give aways and what time of promotions will they run.  If you look at attendance some of the largest attendance games minus the Phillies, Yankees games are for the best giveaway souvenirs.  
    • I’m a big supporter of Brandon Hyde, but the last game against Detroit I think he made a mistake. Second and third, nobody out….I would have had mullins bunt. He’s a good bunter, and with holiday at third I think that’s walk off. 
    • So I guess Ohtani decided he was bored this year since he wasn’t pitching or playing the field, and decided to steal bases just to have something else to do besides hit.  
    • I’d say maybe they would have reached 2013 levels (2.357 mm), which would have been about another 76,000 fans.  I seriously doubt they would have reached 2014 (2.464 mm, another 183,000 fans).   
    • Great point. You are right Frobby. It wouldn't have been quite as bad if the Orioles dropped these series and they had to face Skubal both times but to be fortune enough not to get him either time and still lose 4 of 6 was even more disheartening. 
    • Pretty much exactly what I am thinking.  I even had to cut back on my watching the games because the frustration was killing me.  Now I save all games on DVR and peek at the score if it is safe to watch.  This is odd because when the Orioles suck and they are far below .500 I watch every single game.  Sometimes every single inning of the year.   Crazy if the Orioles had STARTED the year sucking and had to spend the last two months in an amazing race to catch up for a chance for the playoffs we would all be thrilled.   But end the season on a three month skid of misery and the same playoff spot just feels empty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...