Jump to content

O's 2020 MLB Draft Chat: Picking #2/30/39/74

Greg Pappas
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 797
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

MurphDogg
MurphDogg

With the qualifying offer deadline passed, we now know that there will be no picks between the end of the first round and the beginning of Competitive Balance Round A. The only way there could ha

Moose Milligan
Moose Milligan

Quick, hack Elias' radar and make Wilcox a subpar college outfielder.

WalkWithElias
WalkWithElias

Are we sure that's not the top prospects for the lacrosse draft? Those names. Wow. 

Can_of_corn Hangout Grand Counsel

Can_of_corn

Posted
Posted
Just now, interloper said:

Aren't.... they all like that? 

Nope.

If you take the safe pick you are pretty much secure no matter what happens.

You go overslot at 39 for a kid ranked 100 it's a different situation.

Sorry did I just add something to the conversation?  Apologies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
interloper Hangout Grand Counsel

interloper

Posted
Posted
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Nope.

If you take the safe pick you are pretty much secure no matter what happens.

You go overslot at 39 for a kid ranked 100 it's a different situation.

Sorry did I just add something to the conversation?  Apologies.

Either they make it or they don't. Sure a pick is more justified than another, but Rowell was a justified pick at the time and how do we think of that now? We think it was a terrible pick that made the O's look stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Can_of_corn Hangout Grand Counsel

Can_of_corn

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, interloper said:

Either they make it or they don't. Sure a pick is more justified than another, but Rowell was a justified pick at the time and how do we think of that now? We think it was a terrible pick that made the O's look stupid. 

Sure but a Rowell pick isn't going to do the damage to your reputation that a Hobgood is going to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Number5 Hangout Grand Counsel

Number5

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

Maybe we can grab Wilcox at 74?  I shouldn’t get my hopes up.

We can hope.

I'm worried about the Dodgers at #66.  They just took a 5th year senior, so they may be able to pay quite a bit to an over-slot guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Moose Milligan Hangout Grand Counsel

Moose Milligan

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sure but a Rowell pick isn't going to do the damage to your reputation that a Hobgood is going to.

Everyone liked Rowell.  And for a year or two there, he looked like he was legit and then it all went off the rails.  But I remember this board being enamored with him when he put up his stats in his first year.

I really wonder what that guy is up to these days.  He seems to have vanished off the face of the earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scOtt Hangout Grand Counsel

scOtt

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, interloper said:

It's just years and years of hearing the same posts from you nearly 24/7 365. You spend a LOT of time on here just sniping and picking at other posters or the organization without really adding much to the conversation. You've been here for like a decade doing this daily. Doesn't it get old?

Why don't just f-in drop it man.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • Safelykept
      Is Matt Wieters >Adley?

      By Safelykept · Posted

      If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • eddie83
      ALWC Game 1 Attendance

      By eddie83 · Posted

      The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • HowAboutThat
      Erceg vs Seranthony Dominguez

      By HowAboutThat · Posted

      That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • Bemorewins
      ALWC Game 1 Attendance

      By Bemorewins · Posted

      IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • Fiver6565
      ALWC Game 1 Attendance

      By Fiver6565 · Posted

      All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • Fiver6565
      Erceg vs Seranthony Dominguez

      By Fiver6565 · Posted

      I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • Bemorewins
      ALWC Game 1 Attendance

      By Bemorewins · Posted

      I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...