Jump to content

Leonardo Rodriguez


AJHoesnkakes

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, LookinUp said:

What can I say? I saw 21 and 242 days and didn't do the math. Only on this board would someone call you out for something so minor.

Haha, just thought it was funny that two people in this thread described him as almost 22 despite his birthday being four months away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keith Law was asked about him in his chat today, evidently he was at the Aberdeen game last night.

ben: You flagged Leonardo Rodriguez as a sleeper a couple years ago. He’s had a great start in Aberdeen this year but is a little old for the level. Is he still a legit prospect worth watching?
Keith Law: I saw him again last night – he hasn’t progressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at the game last night.

Rodriguez is a funky delivery fastball-slider guy who can throw strikes with both pitches. His fastball sits a a pretty solid 92-94 though he touched 95. there's a little life in the end but he does a good job or using around the edges of the zone. His slider gets more downward action though there is some break as well. He likes to use it low in the zone and gets a lot of swings over the pitch from New York Penn League batters. His slider is typically in the 82-84 range though he flashed an 87 MPH wipe out slider that was a plus pitch once.

His change is firm and straight and he doesn't  have any feel for the pitch. He's a pretty good athlete for his size and is unafraid to shake off his catcher and call his catcher out to talk if he wants to talk over something despite his limited English.

Is he a guy for me? I'll say he's interesting enough to keep a watch on but he definitely has a reliever profile for me. If he can sit 95-96 as a reliever and that slider can bump to the 85-87 range, he suddenly gets a potential late inning reliever. 

He'll be in consideration for the top 30 no doubt. Right now I think he's in the 20-30 range but can rise or fall still over the last month.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the season now:

49 IP, 25 H, 13 BB, 59 Ks, 0.78 WHIP, 4 HRs, .148 opp BA.

Rutschman did allow a steal while he was pitching, so we know he can't hold runners on (sarcasm).

Anyone looking at his stats would note terrific progression from 2018, so some of the "no progression" comments must be qualitative.

His age dif is -0.4 for Aberdeen this season, so he's still a little young for the league.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Filmstudy said:

 His age dif is -0.4 for Aberdeen this season, so he's still a little young for the league.

There is a difference between a 21 year old player in short season ball that has been playing pro ball for several years and a 21 year old college player that was just drafted this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, POR said:

There is a difference between a 21 year old player in short season ball that has been playing pro ball for several years and a 21 year old college player that was just drafted this year.

Is there? No matter where you’ve been for the past 4-5 years, it’s where you are headed from here. No?

I get what you’re saying, but does that really matter in the grand scheme? I mean if he takes off, prospect wise, from here, does anyone care that he has been in professional baseball for 5 years before getting to Delmarva? Does he somehow become less of a prospect? Or is he a success story of perseverance and good coaching? He seems to be another existing talent that Chris Holt and staff have helped turn a corner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, POR said:

There is a difference between a 21 year old player in short season ball that has been playing pro ball for several years and a 21 year old college player that was just drafted this year.

I agree with this, but that certainly doesn’t mean Rodriguez is “old” at 21.   It’s not like we signed him at 16 and it’s taken him 5 years to get this far.    His first year of pro ball was 2017.   So, call him a late bloomer who’s showing some potential.   He’s made good progress from last year to this one.   I’d like to find a way to get him to Delmarva this year and see how he fares in the Sally League.   But the rotation is crowded there.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jammer7 said:

Is there? No matter where you’ve been for the past 4-5 years, it’s where you are headed from here. No?

I get what you’re saying, but does that really matter in the grand scheme? I mean if he takes off, prospect wise, from here, does anyone care that he has been in professional baseball for 5 years before getting to Delmarva? Does he somehow become less of a prospect? Or is he a success story of perseverance and good coaching? He seems to be another existing talent that Chris Holt and staff have helped turn a corner. 

I mean, you can argue that nothing before today matters. The only thing that matters is every day from now on. That leaves out some context when evaluating prospects though.

The argument against a guy like this is that we've had him for 4-5 years and he hasn't taken off yet (maybe until now). The general argument for him is that this might be the first time he's pitched in front of really good player development guys. In that context, there's more hope than there might otherwise be. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LookinUp said:

I mean, you can argue that nothing before today matters. The only thing that matters is every day from now on. That leaves out some context when evaluating prospects though.

The argument against a guy like this is that we've had him for 4-5 years and he hasn't taken off yet (maybe until now). The general argument for him is that this might be the first time he's pitched in front of really good player development guys. In that context, there's more hope than there might otherwise be. 

That would be a factually wrong argument.   We’ve had him since 2017.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rodriguez could certainly be a late bloomer who is benefiting from the new Orioles regime.  However, Rodriguez had a lot of buzz about him in spring training 2018 and was expected to open in Delmarva and he sill has not made it.  To me is is telling that Stauffer was promoted to Delmarva and Rodriguez has not.  

In general there are a bunch of advanced 21 year old mid round 2019 draft picks who are only in the NY Penn League because they already threw a full college season and are just throwing a few pro innings to get their feet wet. 

On a similar topic, who is the better prospect between Robert Neustrom and Jomar Reyes?  Neustrom is a actually few months older but was a 2018 draft pick who just got promoted to Frederick on July 24th.  Reyes is in his 4th year with the Keys and has made little progress.  While I don't think either are likely to emerge as a top prospect, Neustrom clearly has a better chance. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...