Jump to content

Roy Firestone Series (vs. ANGELS, 7/28)


OFFNY

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply
13 minutes ago, Chavez Ravine said:

I never liked legos. Whatever I made bore almost no resemblance to the picture on the box or the marvels other people made.  I was more at the Lincoln Log level.

Trying to do some of the Tinker Toys models was really frustrating. I had to beg my mom to make the helicopter after failing all morning--and she actually could!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, SteveA said:

The defensive stats are really noisy and you need a large sample size for them to have much meaning.   I've heard a full season might not even be enough.   So Santander is nowhere near close enough for those stats to have meaning yet.

Should we just ignore them until a player has X innings, then? Does this at least indicate that Santander is better in right than CF or LF? If the arm is poorly ranked in each position, does that mean anything?

Even given the unreliability of SSS defensive stats, if one guy is significantly better than another with the same SSS, would a comparison be legitimate?

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Trevor Bauer just threw a tantrum.  Wonder if he's going to get fined for it?  Maybe $42,069?

Are you referring to the ball he heaved over the CF fence or something afterwards? Why $42,069?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LA2 said:

Any way you can paraphrase the Boog story?

Palmer said when they first opened The Big A, the famous organist for the Dodger and sometimes Angels played Baby Elephant Walk the first time Boog came to the plate. Boog hits it about 430' to CF. 2nd time up, BEW again. Again huge HR to CF. 3rd time up, he played different walkup music. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, scOtt said:

Palmer said when they first opened The Big A, the famous organist for the Dodger and sometimes Angels played Baby Elephant Walk the first time Boog came to the plate. Boog hits it about 430' to CF. 2nd time up, BEW again. Again huge HR to CF. 3rd time up, he played different walkup music. ?

Haha. That is a good story. I never cared for the organists  back then, but now I would prefer them to how blasted loud and blurred the canned music is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Philip said:

Should we just ignore them until a player has X innings, then? Does this at least indicate that Santander is better in right than CF or LF? If the arm is poorly ranked in each position, does that mean anything?

Even given the unreliability of SSS defensive stats, if one guy is significantly better than another with the same SSS, would a comparison be legitimate?

thanks

Ignore is a strong word.   Don't take them seriously until there is a large sample size.

It takes longer for it to settle down and have meaning than hitting and pitching stats do.   And they take some time.

There will be someone who has been an average or just slightly good player hitting .360 in early May next year.   You'll feel good for the guy, and remark on what a great start he is off to.    But you won't really believe he is a .360 hitter.

It's tough, because intuitively, if "feels" like defense shouldn't have fluctuations (hot streaks and slumps).   Barring a legitimate reason like being hobbled by an injury, you would think it would be consistent.   But apparently, if you believe the numbers in these defensive stats, it doesn't.   Guys go through hot streaks and cold streaks.   And these stats TRY to measure things we can't really measure with the eye test -- the guy being so good he makes the play look easy so we aren't as impressed as we are when another guy makes a diving catch at the exact same spot; or a guy going full out and diving and just not getting to a ball that another guy might have glided over and caught on the fly.   We applaud the diver for the effort but often don't realize just how bad he is.

And then of course you have the fact that defensive results are a combination of ability and positioning.   How much of what you are measuring is due to the guy being positioned better or worse, versus his true ability.   I don't know if they have made any headway in determining that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don't usually start these "XXX got released by a team not as good as us, should we be interested?". But given the state of our bullpen, would he be worth a look? He does have what appears to be one of the major qualifications to be in the 2024 Elias Orioles Bullpen:   he spent many years in the Philly bullpen. https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/40929004/cubs-releasing-former-closer-hector-neris
    • In a weird way, because I view Fabian as a future bench/role player, having clearly identifiable weaknesses isn’t necessarily a bad thing if it means he’s putting up good enough numbers against everything else. They should be able to shield him from his weaknesses in how they deploy him. Fabian very likely won’t ever hit MLB velo or righty breaking balls well enough to be a starter. But lefties on average throw a tick or two slower - can he handle MLB lefty velo? He may struggle with righty breaking balls going away from him, but will he be able to handle lefty offspeed going the same direction (or will he have issues like Cowser vs. righties)? He’s faced so few lefties in the lower minors, hopefully the Orioles can start getting a read on answering those questions at the AAA level. Austin Slater has a career 85 wRC+ vs RHP and 122 wRC+ LHP, and is a decent but not elite defender. He’s been around a 1 WAR/season bench player in his career, one of the better players in that limited role across the league during that time.  Fabian is probably a better defender, so the bar is even lower offensively - if he can even just be 75-85 wRC+ vs. RHP and 100-110 wRC+ vs LHP, he’ll be a pretty good bench piece. 
    • Huh? You don’t know what would have happened in that situation. The very next pitch was a 430 foot home run.    Alvarez hit a 98 mph fastball high and tight to deep center. Sometimes you tip your hat. The other guys get paid to play too. 
    • This just doesn’t even make any sense. They have the most wins in the AL and have the second most wins in the majors. For all of their struggles, they must be at least as good as everyone else. 
    • This is silly. By month orioles runs/game averages: 5.41, 4.53, 5.62, 4.6, 4.7.    The offense has been pretty consistent.    Meanwhile pitching runs/game: 4.10, 3.27, 4.21, 5.36, 4.94. 
    • They should at least consider DFAs for both Kimbrel and Soto.  You can't carry even one pitcher that you are afraid to use, let alone two.  They are not going to be on the team beyond this season.  If there is a technical issue that the staff thinks can be fixed, fine, but especially with Kimbrell it's quite possible that this is just the end of the line.   The best argument for not dumping them is that they don't have anyone else better to replace them with, which is a pretty sad state.  
    • This can’t be a serious question. Of course our pitching has been worse.    Offense by half: 253/313/452/764 vs 263/338/445/783 Pitching by half: 3.71 era, 1.198 whip, 678 ops against vs 4.73 era, 1.357 whip, 734 ops against.    Offense ops by month: 762, 715, 847, 762, 734 Pitching era by month: 3.68, 2.86, 3.73, 4.97, 5.01  You can’t possibly look at those numbers and blame the 500 play on the offense. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...