Jump to content

MLB suspended, Opening Day delayed indefinitely UPDATED


interloper

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, scOtt said:

Very possible. Even if they allow fans I would guess attendance would be down... maybe down 75%. Some massive amount. People will be scared.

I don't know.  Restaurants and retailers are doing fine so far in my neck of the woods.  I wonder how busy the Ren fest is going to be this weekend (I went two weeks ago)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please give blood if you can.

By now, you’ve seen the headlines and heard the news. Communities across the country are closely monitoring the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and following public health preparedness guidance. Part of that preparation includes maintaining a readily available blood supply for hospital patients. The last thing patients should have to worry about during this time is a shortage.

As the number of COVID-19 cases grow, so does the need for healthy blood donors. Right now, the American Red Cross strongly urges eligible donors to schedule their next appointment to donate blood.

Here’s the good news: Donating blood is a safe process and people should not hesitate to give or receive blood. If you are healthy and able, please come in to give. You can help change the headlines with a blood donation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

Best case.  April is no way that is happening.Once they started testing for real in NY ,they now have 421 cases and counting. How many others never tested and had the virus ,we will never know .

So far the US has been doing relatively well.

Quote

The United States as of Friday had surpassed 1,700 confirmed or presumptive cases of the coronavirus, and the death toll climbed to 41

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't know.  Restaurants and retailers are doing fine so far in my neck of the woods.  I wonder how busy the Ren fest is going to be this weekend (I went two weeks ago)?

We're on the edge of a "hotspot", 3 miles from MD. We're still planning on going out for St. Patrick's day.

 

Special corned beef and cabbage!

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't know.  Restaurants and retailers are doing fine so far in my neck of the woods.  I wonder how busy the Ren fest is going to be this weekend (I went two weeks ago)?

A city will be quarantined somewhere in the US in the next few weeks. But other areas will not have the clusters and be almost normal. At least normal in this abnormal time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Earlier in the outbreak, U.S. health officials said there was a hypothesis among mathematical modelers that the outbreak “could potentially be seasonal” and relent in warmer conditions.
  • “We hope it does. That would be a godsend,” said WHO’s Dr. Mike Ryan. “But we can’t make that assumption. And there is no evidence.”

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/06/its-a-false-hope-coronavirus-will-disappear-in-the-summer-like-the-flu-who-says.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Going Underground said:

Just the beginning. Just to test for real  later next week.

Not trying to be flippet, but with the 41 deaths, nothing to test for, dead is dead, and 41 families are impacted.

5,375 from what I read, is the death outside of the US.

Which is why I said, so far, the US has done relatively well in comparison.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Going Underground said:
  • Earlier in the outbreak, U.S. health officials said there was a hypothesis among mathematical modelers that the outbreak “could potentially be seasonal” and relent in warmer conditions.
  • “We hope it does. That would be a godsend,” said WHO’s Dr. Mike Ryan. “But we can’t make that assumption. And there is no evidence.”

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/06/its-a-false-hope-coronavirus-will-disappear-in-the-summer-like-the-flu-who-says.html

Not everybody is in agreement with the CDC either. Some have citicized them for their initial handling and leading to the hysteria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Number5 said:

I was thinking about how they didn't cancel the season back in 1919, and it occurred to me that if they had Joe Jackson would probably be in the Hall of Fame.

The War Department did order the 1918 season stopped on September 2nd due to WWI, so most teams played about 125 games.  Then in 1919 the schedule was 140 games, although it's unclear to me just why - the season began and ended on roughly the same dates as the 154-game schedule of 1920.  I think they just decided to have a shorter schedule that year.  Pretty sure it had nothing to do with the flu pandemic.

The Black Sox would have still been bitter, they probably would have just thrown games in 1920.  The game was rife with unsavory characters in the 1910s, it's likely to have blown up in some way, eventually.  Something like 21 players were banned or informally told to never show their faces at a MLB park again in the 1915-1920 timeframe.  Maybe Jackson would have kept himself out of it, maybe not.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

The War Department did order the 1918 season stopped on September 2nd due to WWI, so most teams played about 125 games.  Then in 1919 the schedule was 140 games, although it's unclear to me just why - the season began and ended on roughly the same dates as the 154-game schedule of 1920.  I think they just decided to have a shorter schedule that year.  Pretty sure it had nothing to do with the flu pandemic.

The Black Sox would have still been bitter, they probably would have just thrown games in 1920.  The game was rife with unsavory characters in the 1910s, it's likely to have blown up in some way, eventually.  Something like 21 players were banned or informally told to never show their faces at a MLB park again in the 1915-1920 timeframe.  Maybe Jackson would have kept himself out of it, maybe not.

The 1918 flu in the United States did not really ramp up until late August or early September in most cities.This later version was more deadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

The War Department did order the 1918 season stopped on September 2nd due to WWI, so most teams played about 125 games.  Then in 1919 the schedule was 140 games, although it's unclear to me just why - the season began and ended on roughly the same dates as the 154-game schedule of 1920.  I think they just decided to have a shorter schedule that year.  Pretty sure it had nothing to do with the flu pandemic.

The Black Sox would have still been bitter, they probably would have just thrown games in 1920.  The game was rife with unsavory characters in the 1910s, it's likely to have blown up in some way, eventually.  Something like 21 players were banned or informally told to never show their faces at a MLB park again in the 1915-1920 timeframe.  Maybe Jackson would have kept himself out of it, maybe not.

Saw this

The war ended in November 1918, and the clubs, hustling to get some of their players out of military uniform and into baseball uniform, decided on a 140-game card in 1919.  The season turned out well; in fact, a new home run record by Babe Ruth gave great promise for the future.  A 154-game schedule was mapped for 1920 and this was continued without a hitch through World War II.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't know.  Restaurants and retailers are doing fine so far in my neck of the woods.  I wonder how busy the Ren fest is going to be this weekend (I went two weeks ago)?

Ive been out to eat 3 times this week and the places are pretty well packed.

Stores are packed and shelves bare, like a snow flake in the air.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Angelos did fight the relocation.  He voted against, lobbied against it, withheld permission to adjust TV territories, and threatened to sue if not fairly compensated.  As long as the team was compensated for the loss of broadcast exclusivity, I don’t think he had any other case. From all reports, he drove a hard bargain and it took like 9 months to negotiate a compensation and settlement agreement. There was a wide discrepancy among various parties about what constituted just compensation with Angelos taking more pessimistic views of the impact of the Nats franchise and less optimistic view on MASN. Also, MASN was in perpetuity not temporary.  In hindsight, MASN probably didn’t provide the revenue protection intended because of how the dispute played out and how the RSN market collapsed, but that’s in hindsight. Overall, Angelos “won” the MASN dispute (at least the RSDC process) more than he lost it - the Nationals advocated for rights fees intentionally designed to bankrupt MASN but the RSDC didn’t use their comps. Overall, I think it’s fair to say that relocating a team to DC has hurt the Baltimore club’s market size and ability to fund a top-10 payroll.   HOWEVER, had the Nats not come to DC, the specter of an Orioles relocation to DC would have been hanging over our heads especially as Peter’s health declined, the stadium aged, and the lease approached. Peter would never have moved, but are we sure JA would turn down a higher offer of say $2.3BN offer from Ted Leonsis or someone with the intent to move the club to DC? I think as an Orioles fan it’s probably best to have another team in DC than have to worry about the Orioles ever relocating there.
    • Everything revolves around the health of the player. I think Gunnar has more. I think the collision with Mateo set Gunnar back and affected him in ways we will never know. I'm no mind specialist but Gunnar is young plays all out, and that had to bother him. I've watched that collision a number of times. No fault - just two players going all out and one is finished for the year. It just so happened that Gunnar got the yips and his batting went south soon thereafter. Maybe a coincidence but I think we will see a rejuvenated Gunnar next year and all stops are off. 
    • I’m not so sure the bolded part is true. I think a lot of that last bit can have to do with small skills: situational hitting/running, above average play in close games, generally things that can be boiled down to “luck.” I didn’t see this years team as having a major talent discrepancy from the 2023 version.
    • As great as Gunnar is can’t assume he matches last year. That said I like the odds of the team as a whole matching what we did. 
    • The real improvement of this team will come from within.    The 3-5 players they bring in from outside the org will supplement the roster…maybe put it over the top but the real improvement will come from those already in the org.
    • Yeah. -Would love to keep Burnes but I seriously doubt it. -I have a lot of faith in Adley.  - Holliday has huge ceiling even if he isn’t ready to be elite.  - doesn’t always work this way but the better your closer is tends to help rest of pen 
    • Nice OP. Thanks for the effort. Like the chart. Surprised it hasn't received much response. You sum up a lot of what I hope for as well. I'd add: I think a full - healty year of Westy will be even more valuable. I think Gunnar has even more in the tank. I want - hope that Holliday can develop into the lead off hitter and OBP table setter we need. And, I so want Cowser to cut down on strike outs and continue to develop as a professional hitter. I think he has the potential to cover for the loss of Santander while Big K develops on the right side. A lot to hope for but I believe these youngsters have a lot of potential yet to tap. And oh yes - I want Mayo to make Roy and all of us proud! Thanks again for the effort! I look at pitching as if we have a base. I agree with your points 1 and 2.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...