Jump to content

League Proposes 16-Team Playoff Bracket


TommyPickles

Recommended Posts

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2020/06/mlb-rumors-16-teams-playoff-postseason-expansion.html

 

I'm sure some of you saw this yesterday, but one of the components of the League's latest proposal was having a 16-team playoff bracket:

 

"The league asked for 2020 postseason fields to expand even beyond the previously discussed 14 teams, adding another team per league and bringing the total to 16 playoff clubs.

The idea behind the league’s latest expansion would see a traditional bracket format play out, with the No. 1 seed playing the No. 8 seed, No. 2 vs. No. 7, etc. until each league has played down to one winner to square off in the World Series. The first round of play, Sherman adds, would be just a three-game set.

That’s a particularly strong deviation from the norm, where the top teams in each league have long been assured at least a five-game series against the weakest playoff entrant. The prospect of a sub-.500 No. 8 seed upsetting a dominant N0. 1 seed would create some excitement, to be sure, but the watered down playoff field and short early-round formats would undoubtedly be a turnoff for a very vocal set of MLB fans as well."

 

What are your thoughts on this?  

If this was instituted long term, how would it change organizational strategies?  Seems like it'd be much harder to justify a "full rebuild" if all you had to do was get a 78-84 record to make the playoffs, keep your fanbase happy, and roll the dice...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am 100% against this in a normal season but considering how few games will be played it’s harder for me to get worked up about it. I still would prefer even in this season limiting it to 7 teams. At least give the top seed some advantage. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eddie83 said:

I am 100% against this in a normal season but considering how few games will be played it’s harder for me to get worked up about it. I still would prefer even in this season limiting it to 7 teams. At least give the top seed some advantage. 

Agreed. Dislike it for a normal season, but with less games to sort out who truly deserves which seeds, I think it's fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, I'm against it for normal seasons but this is the season to do some @DrungoHazewood$#*% where you can push the pitchers mound back so they pitch from second base, make it so the ball falls apart after it gets hit really hard like they did in the 1870s, have a left field fence that's 230 feet away but 475 down the line to right field, 15 seconds between pitches unless a pitcher farts and then its 10 seconds, expand the rosters to 57 players and the visiting team gets to pick the fattest guy in the stands to be the DH for the home team, in bases loaded situations a batter can choose between a regular bat or a tennis racket or one of those fat red wiffleball bats, a third baseman can tackle a runner one time per game if they round third and head for home, switch hitters can change sides of the plate during an at bat, if you're playing after 13 innings you have to run the bases in reverse order, penalty kicks if it goes past 16 innings and other shenanigans.  

Sure, 16 teams in the playoffs.  But one of the things that makes the NBA and NHL ridiculous is that half the league makes the playoffs.  Which, if you're a Wizards fan can keep you engaged as you can watch your hapless team try to vie for a playoff berth only to get trounced by the 1 or 2 seed.  I don't want to see a 78 win team make the playoffs in a real baseball season...it kinda cheapens the whole thing, IMO.  

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I agree, I'm against it for normal seasons but this is the season to do some @DrungoHazewood$#*% where you can push the pitchers mound back so they pitch from second base, make it so the ball falls apart after it gets hit really hard like they did in the 1870s, have a left field fence that's 230 feet away but 475 down the line to right field, 15 seconds between pitches unless a pitcher farts and then its 10 seconds, expand the rosters to 57 players and the visiting team gets to pick the fattest guy in the stands to be the DH for the home team, in bases loaded situations a batter can choose between a regular bat or a tennis racket or one of those fat red wiffleball bats, a third baseman can tackle a runner one time per game if they round third and head for home, switch hitters can change sides of the plate during an at bat, if you're playing after 13 innings you have to run the bases in reverse order, penalty kicks if it goes past 16 innings and other shenanigans.  

Sure, 16 teams in the playoffs.  But one of the things that makes the NBA and NHL ridiculous is that half the league makes the playoffs.  Which, if you're a Wizards fan can keep you engaged as you can watch your hapless team try to vie for a playoff berth only to get trounced by the 1 or 2 seed.  I don't want to see a 78 win team make the playoffs in a real baseball season...it kinda cheapens the whole thing, IMO.  

My preference is for the best team in each league goes to the World Series, so the real drama and excitement is the pennant race.  But only if each team has a reasonable shot at competing on a regular basis, which means taking down the Yanks and Sox and Dodgers a few pegs. Which they can't.  So whatever.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, obviously trade deadlines and September decisions would be different with more things on the line, but in the 00's we would have additionally made the playoffs only in 2013 (one game playoff, tied for 8th). I think this really shows the team's ineptitude during this century.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

I agree, I'm against it for normal seasons but this is the season to do some @DrungoHazewood$#*% where you can push the pitchers mound back so they pitch from second base, make it so the ball falls apart after it gets hit really hard like they did in the 1870s, have a left field fence that's 230 feet away but 475 down the line to right field, 15 seconds between pitches unless a pitcher farts and then its 10 seconds, expand the rosters to 57 players and the visiting team gets to pick the fattest guy in the stands to be the DH for the home team, in bases loaded situations a batter can choose between a regular bat or a tennis racket or one of those fat red wiffleball bats, a third baseman can tackle a runner one time per game if they round third and head for home, switch hitters can change sides of the plate during an at bat, if you're playing after 13 innings you have to run the bases in reverse order, penalty kicks if it goes past 16 innings and other shenanigans.  

Sure, 16 teams in the playoffs.  But one of the things that makes the NBA and NHL ridiculous is that half the league makes the playoffs.  Which, if you're a Wizards fan can keep you engaged as you can watch your hapless team try to vie for a playoff berth only to get trounced by the 1 or 2 seed.  I don't want to see a 78 win team make the playoffs in a real baseball season...it kinda cheapens the whole thing, IMO.  

I know you are just having fun, but that one is allowed, isn't it?  Always forget the rules with switch hitter, but I swear I remember a video of a Milb switch pitcher and switch hitter changing back and forth over and over, neither one giving in.  But, maybe that was only before the first pitch was thrown?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, murph said:

I know you are just having fun, but that one is allowed, isn't it?  Always forget the rules with switch hitter, but I swear I remember a video of a Milb switch pitcher and switch hitter changing back and forth over and over, neither one giving in.  But, maybe that was only before the first pitch was thrown?

It might be allowed.  I'm not sure.  But I'd like to see it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rule 5.07(f)

A pitcher must indicate visually to the umpire-in-chief, the batter and any runners the hand with which he intends to pitch, which may be done by wearing his glove on the other hand while touching the pitcher's plate. The pitcher is not permitted to pitch with the other hand until the batter is retired, the batter becomes a runner, the inning ends, the batter is substituted for by a pinch-hitter or the pitcher incurs an injury. In the event a pitcher switches pitching hands during an at-bat because he has suffered an injury, the pitcher may not, for the remainder of the game, pitch with the hand from which he has switched. The pitcher shall not be given the opportunity to throw any preparatory pitches after switching pitching hands. Any change of pitching hands must be indicated clearly to the umpire-in-chief.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about all games end after 3 hours, team in the lead wins. Maybe let them finish the current inning for fairness. If tied it doesn't count in standings so no points for ties. Teams would likely take more chances close and late to break the tie, maybe be more interesting to fans. Stats for the game would count for the player individual statistics and team totals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AnythingO's said:

How about all games end after 3 hours, team in the lead wins. Maybe let them finish the current inning for fairness. If tied it doesn't count in standings so no points for ties. Teams would likely take more chances close and late to break the tie, maybe be more interesting to fans. Stats for the game would count for the player individual statistics and team totals.

This only works if you have rules precluding stalling.    Otherwise, the team in the lead slow plays it.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

This only works if you have rules precluding stalling.    Otherwise, the team in the lead slow plays it.   

I guess but how? Wouldn't that be harder with pitch clocks and 3 batter minimum to reduce pitching changes? I was thinking it would benefit a lesser team like the O's if they had a lead after 4-5 innings and their expanded roster had lots of 1 inning guys. They make it a bullpen game and it's a lot easier to build a deep bullpen. I was thinking Buck would love it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • You put Ventura in the 1884 Union Association and he wins 57 games just that year. Well, except being a mentally unstable member of a minority group in a less enlightened era, with what was probably a limited grasp of English, I'm thinking he gets shot in a bar the evening after opening day...
    • What does everyone think about Tyler Soderstrom or Kyle McCann? I think I might be willing to trade Basallo if we can get someone like Miller plus some decent depth at catcher. We could also maybe add a couple of our younger lower level prospects to the trade. The A’s are probably looking for as much youth as possible and don’t have as much use for these guys who can contribute now.   I think depth at catcher will be big for the O’s, with as much as they want to DH Adley. Would love to have a lefty hitting catcher with some power to give Adley more regular days off. The biggest hangup I’d have to trading Basallo is that he could end up being that guy. If he doesn’t look like he can stick at catcher, I’d be more willing to trade him because we already have plenty of 1B/DH type guys. 
    • On the other hand, @Sports Guy's take isn't uncommon because Nick had a 7.4 win season at the age of 24. Following a really good season at 23, and a solid rookie season at 22 after he skipped AA. If you look hard enough in the archives here you can find a post I made in 2009 or 2010 saying Nick had about a 1-in-3 chance of being a Hall of Famer. 14 wins through three seasons and age 24 is a heck of a foundation to build on. Lots of Hall of Famers were behind that pace. But unfortunately he never had another 3-win season, much less a seven. Age 27 peak is just an average, it's not destiny. But it's pretty rare to have Nick's first three years and then not have much more career value from age 25-36, total. Injuries or whatever reason, he was worth 14 wins from 22-24, and 20 from 25-36. And as much as I wanted him to stay, his years in Atlanta were just treading water, piling up base hits, but a cumulative value above replacement in six years about equal to his 2008 season. Nick was almost certainly not a difference-maker the large majority of his last 8-9 years in the league.
    • Which one of those is he not on par with in terms of talent? Maybe Chapman? Maybe.
    • Cowser getting the night off tonight makes sense.
    • He's going to be on next year's ballot for the actual Cooperstown HOF. So if they don't care when you're "officially" retired why should the Orioles? 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...