Jump to content

Where do Kjerstad/Westburg fit on the 2023/24 team


wildcard

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

That probably demonstrates the unrealistic/uninformed casual opinion of the value of the slot than anything.

Nope, I understand the value of the slot just fine. 
 

It’s impossible to get excited about Mark Trumbo as your reward for a 108 loss season. If that’s what Kjerstad turns out to be. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Power hitter with low OBP and questionable corner defense.

And he's a recent Oriole.

That doesn't count as real reasons?

Awfully lazy.  Heston never had an OBP under .400 in college, and by all accounts he's a decent RFer with a strong arm.   

Trumbo never reached anything close to questionable RF defense.  Trumbo's best OBP was .317.  

I don't know what Heston will do, but let's not do these lazy negative comps that hurt my head.   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

Nope, I understand the value of the slot just fine. 
 

It’s impossible to get excited about Mark Trumbo as your reward for a 108 loss season. If that’s what Kjerstad turns out to be. 

Sorry, wasn't directing that entirely at you. But if you understand it logically, you're probably better off accepting the reality. 

Also, Trumbo wasn't a mediocre player for his whole career. We remember his last 2-3 years here (or however long it was) where he was really just taking up space. A Mark Trumbo in his prime can (and has) contribute to a championship-caliber team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ruzious said:

Awfully lazy.  Heston never had an OBP under .400 in college, and by all accounts he's a decent RFer with a strong arm.   

Trumbo never reached anything close to questionable RF defense.  Trumbo's best OBP was .317.  

I don't know what Heston will do, but let's not do these lazy negative comps that hurt my head.   

 

 

Aren't our comps usually lazy?  Like when folks want to comp an Asian player to another Asian player.

As for defense, I'm not expecting much out of his glove if this is where he is out of college.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

Sorry, wasn't directing that entirely at you. But if you understand it logically, you're probably better off accepting the reality. 

Also, Trumbo wasn't a mediocre player for his whole career. We remember his last 2-3 years here (or however long it was) where he was really just taking up space. A Mark Trumbo in his prime can (and has) contribute to a championship-caliber team.

In ~2012 some folks on the OH were yearning for a MOO bat like Trumbo (he was named specifically). 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Superficial comps thread - down defensive spectrum guys by descending 2019 SLG%, likely Kjerstad's strongest suit.  Trying for mostly lefty hitters.

yelich and blackmon different cats

Austin Meadows

juan soto - would not have guessed meadows outslugged him.

Matt Olson

Joc Pederson

trey mancini

Moustakas/Muncy/Carlos Santana

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Aren't our comps usually lazy?  Like when folks want to comp an Asian player to another Asian player.

As for defense, I'm not expecting much out of his glove if this is where he is out of college.

I don't know.  Until yesterday, I haven't been here from more than a few minutes at a time for at least 3 months.  For all I know, the 2 Asian players you're talking about are identical twins in the Korean league.    

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

I wouldn’t be thrilled about getting a Trumbo with the #2 overall pick, even if he would be above average for the slot. 

Yep.  As I've often said, any reasonably high draft pick who doesn't have a 90th percentile career is a disappointment.  Matt Wieters is both the 9th-best #5 pick of all time (out of 55), and a bitter tragedy to many.  Nick Markakis is the 4th-best #7 of all time, and it's not even close, he's 11 wins ahead of the 5th-best (Prince Fielder).  Markakis in no way lived up to his early career projections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Yep.  As I've often said, any reasonably high draft pick who doesn't have a 90th percentile career is a disappointment.  Matt Wieters is both the 9th-best #5 pick of all time (out of 55), and a bitter tragedy to many.  Nick Markakis is the 4th-best #7 of all time, and it's not even close, he's 11 wins ahead of the 5th-best (Prince Fielder).  Markakis in no way lived up to his early career projections.

Remember how one projection system had Markakis' performance dropping off sharply and how everyone ripped it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

We have MULTIPLE Trumbo 2.0s...therein lies the problem. 

Everyone has multiple Trumbos.  There are guys that fit the Trumbo mold but were like 10% worse who had careers that were 86 games long.  Pedro Alvarez is basically a left handed Trumbo and had 700 PAs in the International League in 2017-18.  Renato Nunez is Mark Trumbo, and he's not going to be in the league much longer if he's a DH with a 100 OPS+. J.R. House had 60 MLB PAs and he was as good a hitter as Mark Trumbo, and probably about as good a RFer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Remember how one projection system had Markakis' performance dropping off sharply and how everyone ripped it?

No, I don't remember that.  I just remember saying in ~2010 that he had about a 30% chance at 3000 hits and people told me I had a screw loose.  He won't get there, but he won't be all that far off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...