Jump to content

Analysis of 2020 Rule 5 Eligible players


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

Do you think Jones and McGregor's K rates would be the same in this era?     You don't think Scott McGregor or Randy Jones could have pitched in this era?   Is that what you are saying?

I think they would be higher, but not high enough.

Yes I don't think Jones or McGregor would have been successful starting pitchers in this era.

Maybe bullpen guys, not starters.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think they would be higher, but not high enough.

Yes I don't think Jones or McGregor would have been successful starting pitchers in this era.

Maybe bullpen guys, not starters.

 

And Wells probably throws harder than either of them, right?  I’m just hoping he has a shot.  Would be fun to watch a pitcher like that succeed today.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, murph said:

And Wells probably throws harder than either of them, right?  I’m just hoping he has a shot.  Would be fun to watch a pitcher like that succeed today.  

I'm hoping he does well.

But I personally wouldn't bring up Jones or McGregor as comps when they pitched over thirty years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Nunez being released is a very mild surprise.    I think this is a shot of confidence for Bannon in particular.    Nunez release is certainly good news for someone like D.J. Stewart.

Not a surprise in the sense that it is the right move, but it might be a little bit surprising that they actually did the right move. The times they are a changing’...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

I know Davis is on the roster but, at this point, I don't consider him part of the active team.  Each AB that Chris Davis gets going forward is a black mark for the Orioles.  It looked like they understood that by the end of the season last year.

Right.  It’s fine that you are keeping him right now because of covid...and perhaps, depending on how things go, you end up keeping him on the active roster for a little while to see if the season gets canceled, although I think that is highly unlikely.

At this point, the plan should be to keep him up until you know when the season starts and then you cut him.  
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Scott has improved of late, but he’s still walking 7 guys per nine, he has a 1.4 WHIP, and is completely infuriating. When he was here he drove everybody nuts, and when the Marlins traded for him, I knew there was something seriously wrong with that braintrust. Im backing off of Miller, I think he’s coming to earth, and is always close to a TJ vacation, but Scott isn’t the answer at all.
    • The point wasn’t who was better between Irvin or Grayson, it was that if there is even a discussion, Grayson can’t be considered part of a “Big 3”.  After his performance in the playoffs last year and his lack of command so far this season, he needs to show a decent amount of improvement to be looked at that way.
    • https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/grayson-rodriguez-680570?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/cole-irvin-608344?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb Grayson has a higher ceiling than Cole, I think almost anyone would argue, yes.  But even if we're strictly looking at numbers, despite Grayson's uneven start, he is still statistically better than Cole in a handful of areas (mainly whiff rate, K rate, xBA, xERA).
    • Given his success here and perhaps lack of strong interest elsewhere, I wouldn't be surprised if Lopez would be OK with a minor league deal here.
    • Lots of stats say Irvin hasn’t been better this year. Grayson has had a few rough starts around his injury…he’s been excellent otherwise and has been excellent since he got re-called last year. Irvin is pitching very well but he’s not a sub 3 ERA guy.  He may be a sub 4 ERA guy though. 
    • One factor to consider in taking HS talent is age.  Historically, prep players that are 19'ish work out less often than their younger counterparts.  The main reason is that they are physically more mature, and thus have an advantage.  There have been exceptions certainly, but often they have weaker careers.   Sig is well aware of the analytics, so it would be a bit surprising to see us go that route. In 2019, we took Gunnar 26 days before his 18th birthday, and Holliday was 18.6 years old when we took him in 2022.  It's a factor... but I can't say with certainty we wouldn't draft a 19-year old that early.
    • I don't have a horse in that race, but I question your logic. Seems like you're saying: Stuff > Results. Or maybe, so far this year Irvin is better, but long term you're betting on Grayson?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...