Jump to content

They asked Mancini and Santander to defer money


eddie83

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

This would raise more questions about the finances of the Angelos's.  Is there situation that bad that they need to make a minimum profit for the O's every year.  This makes me hope for a sale sooner rather than later.

The thing that concerns me is multiple things can be true at the same time. They can be running the baseball ops properly and be cheap as well. 
 

I don’t want Elias leaving because a new owner is taking over. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

So does all my speculation about them cost cutting still seem unlikely?

It was obvious they were cost cutting with the trades and non tenders, but this is taking it to another level.  They should sell the team and get that huge sum of money instead of extreme penny pinching like this. It just looks bad all around. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jabba72 said:

It was obvious they were cost cutting with the trades and non tenders, but this is taking it to another level.  They should sell the team and get that huge sum of money instead of extreme penny pinching like this. It just looks bad all around. 

They let coaches go to save money.

I'd never heard of that before.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is why Davis is still here.  They have to pay him anyway but if they cut him they have to pay his roster replacement too.  Sell the damn team already.  The farm is improving, the players are cheap, MASN is a mess, and who knows what's up with the stadium lease.  Let's move on already.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

The thing that concerns me is multiple things can be true at the same time. They can be running the baseball ops properly and be cheap as well. 
 

I don’t want Elias leaving because a new owner is taking over. 

 I have to think if he gets an offer from any other team at this point Elias is gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so sure my decision to open up the Hangout today was such a good idea.  This is just incredibly surprising news.   I am more than a little concerned, but I am just not sure what I am concerned about.  Wish someone form the Orioles would come out and talk openly and candidly about what is going with this organization but I know that’s not happening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe the reason is more business minded then dire.

These are one year deals.

The team knows revenue at the Yard will be down and the product they are putting own on a major league level will be low quality.

So for this year they defer until revenues rebound.  

The Davis deal is the 'big lump" that many other rebuilding franchises didn't have to carry- to this amount.

I am hopeful this is more business minded creative thinking then a sign things are so rough.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Are you directing that at me?    
    • I think probably what’s bothering people the most is that Holliday was hitting unbelievably well as of his call-up (.333/.462/.595), and he hasn’t been at that level of domination since being sent down (.259/.437/.445).  Plus, his K rate was 14.3% before the call-up, 24.2% since.   Bottom line, his meteoric ascent last year and his fast start this year set crazy-high expectations that he’s not quite meeting.   Personally, I’m not worried at all, but I’d like to see his post-return BA back in the .300ish range before I’d be clamoring for another call-up.   
    • I didn't say he was good.  I don't trust Akin with runners on. And certainly not in high leverage situations. The numbers show that as much. His numbers against lefties don't matter if he melts down when runners are on.  If they were that worried about a lefty masher Garver and know how bad Akin can be in these types of situations, then why put him in with Garver on deck?  I guess, to me, I leave Baker in. If he gets out of it, then Akin can sit down or if he comes in...pitch around Garver. The hitters after him aren't exactly Murderer's Row. Look at how he performed with nobody on vs. runners on (bases clearing double, 2 run homer)
    • I meant for both. Although thinking about it, Texas would probably want Beavers, they have the corner OF spots covered.
    • Yeah. Not your fault. Poor way they handle it. Don’t get it. 
    • Your link does say inherited runners allowed to score but that’s not accurate. I don’t get why they have it incorrectly listed that way. 
    • Do they? Is it? I'm pretty sure we've gone over the whole strikeouts don't increase pitch counts thing a hundred times. I think if managers wanted starters to go deep in games you would see more starters go deep into games. Is there one team in the majors in which the starters are going appreciably deeper into games? Baltimore is fifth in innings by starters.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...