Jump to content

John Means 2021


Il BuonO

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

SSS isn’t really worth discussing imo.  
 

I think he needs it to be a little more consistent.  It doesn’t have to be a great pitch but it needs to be more consistent.  Means himself has talked about the inconsistency of the pitch.  

Nobody is arguing that his curve is a great pitch.   To me the question is, how good does it need to be in order for Means to be a top flight major league pitcher?   The biggest sample we have is his whole career, 254 innings at 134 ERA+.   That’s awfully good.    On the one hand, his 4.31 FIP suggests that could slip.    On the other hand, he is currently pitching the best baseball of his life.   So, maybe it gets better.   And Hyde has said many times that his curve today is much better than it was in 2019.    So even if it’s not a great pitch, it may be enough to complement the two great pitches he has.    But only time will tell.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Nobody is arguing that his curve is a great pitch.   To me the question is, how good does it need to be in order for Means to be a top flight major league pitcher?   The biggest sample we have is his whole career, 254 innings at 134 ERA+.   That’s awfully good.    On the one hand, his 4.31 FIP suggests that could slip.    On the other hand, he is currently pitching the best baseball of his life.   So, maybe it gets better.   And Hyde has said many times that his curve today is much better than it was in 2019.    So even if it’s not a great pitch, it may be enough to complement the two great pitches he has.    But only time will tell.   

If you can achieve a good speed diff between your heat and your off speed, and have good control, you will be an above average pitcher in the bigs.

Pretty old school foundation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Redskins Rick said:

If you can achieve a good speed diff between your heat and your off speed, and have good control, you will be an above average pitcher in the bigs.

Pretty old school foundation.

 

It takes a lot more than that.  For instance velocity and movement.  I don't care how good your control is you show up with an 85 MPH fastball that doesn't move you are getting rocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It takes a lot more than that.  For instance velocity and movement.  I don't care how good your control is you show up with an 85 MPH fastball that doesn't move you are getting rocked.

It does also take movement, my bad for not mentioning that.

If you can hit 15+ MPH diff between your pitches, and they are not easy to distinguish, you will have some success in the bigs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Redskins Rick said:

If you can achieve a good speed diff between your heat and your off speed, and have good control, you will be an above average pitcher in the bigs.

Pretty old school foundation.

 

I’d say speed difference between fastball and curve isn’t usually much of an issue.   The average FB is 93.3 and curve 79.6 these days. The curve tends to be the slowest pitch in most pitchers’ arsenal.   I’d say the amount and type of break, location, and ability to throw it without tipping it are the keys to a good curve.  

Means is averaging 92.7 on FB and 77.5 on curve.   That’s fine.  The metrics at Fangraphs show his curve having a positive value in both 2020 and 2021, unlike 2019 when it was negative.    So can it be better and more consistent?   Yes.   But Means has made progress with it.
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’d say speed difference between fastball and curve isn’t usually much of an issue.   The average FB is 93.3 and curve 79.6 these days. The curve tends to be the slowest pitch in most pitchers’ arsenal.   I’d say the amount and type of break, location, and ability to throw it without tipping it are the keys to a good curve.  

Means is averaging 92.7 on FB and 77.5 on curve.   That’s fine.  The metrics at Fangraphs show his curve having a positive value in both 2020 and 2021, unlike 2019 when it was negative.    So can it be better and more consistent?   Yes.   But Means has made progress with it.
 

93 MPH is very hittable by MLB batters.

But 14-15 MPH diff, keeps the hitter off balance, and guessing.

If he is sitting back waiting for the slower 80 MPH pitch, the 93 will blow by him like a freight train.

I like the curve a bit more than the changeup, the change in flight of the ball, can cause the hitter additional issues hitting the ball.

Major League hitters sitting back guessing a changeup and take that thing for a long ride.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Sure let's blame the ump.

Always someone or something to blame.

For the love of God was referring to this specific game. He was squeezed and Galvis didn’t make a play. I didn’t say he was Koufax. 
 

The team sucks. We all get it. Means is very good but not a HOF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

For the love of God was referring to this specific game. He was squeezed and Galvis didn’t make a play. I didn’t say he was Koufax. 
 

The team sucks. We all get it. Means is very good but not a HOF. 

When your catchers cant present the ball properly you are not going to get as many favorable calls.

He isn't being squeezed his catchers are hurting him.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sure let's blame the ump.

Always someone or something to blame.

I didn’t see the whole game, but Means was not that sharp in the part I saw.   Left a lot of change ups in bad locations.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Saturday's game was epically bad and not the type of loss a team on the upswing into the playoffs would suffer and one that I certainly hate to witness. I couldn't watch most of the game Sunday, but I wouldn't DVR it and then peek at the score either, I don't think that I would ever watch if I knew the outcome of a game in advance. The surprise elation (Gunnar's bases loaded double) and the agony of the non-send and inability to hit a sac fly is what keeps me coming back, old fool that I am.
    • Predicting what the attendance will do next year is like predicting Hurrican season in January.  There are so many outside factors that it is just a guess.  How will they finish the year, how much will the spend in the offseason, how many corporations want to get ticket plans,   how is the economy in 6 months, how do they play next season what teams we play and when, will teams like Red Sox, Yankees and big draws play well.   I also think one of the biggest factors is what corporations want to sponsor give aways and what time of promotions will they run.  If you look at attendance some of the largest attendance games minus the Phillies, Yankees games are for the best giveaway souvenirs.  
    • I’m a big supporter of Brandon Hyde, but the last game against Detroit I think he made a mistake. Second and third, nobody out….I would have had mullins bunt. He’s a good bunter, and with holiday at third I think that’s walk off. 
    • So I guess Ohtani decided he was bored this year since he wasn’t pitching or playing the field, and decided to steal bases just to have something else to do besides hit.  
    • I’d say maybe they would have reached 2013 levels (2.357 mm), which would have been about another 76,000 fans.  I seriously doubt they would have reached 2014 (2.464 mm, another 183,000 fans).   
    • Great point. You are right Frobby. It wouldn't have been quite as bad if the Orioles dropped these series and they had to face Skubal both times but to be fortune enough not to get him either time and still lose 4 of 6 was even more disheartening. 
    • Pretty much exactly what I am thinking.  I even had to cut back on my watching the games because the frustration was killing me.  Now I save all games on DVR and peek at the score if it is safe to watch.  This is odd because when the Orioles suck and they are far below .500 I watch every single game.  Sometimes every single inning of the year.   Crazy if the Orioles had STARTED the year sucking and had to spend the last two months in an amazing race to catch up for a chance for the playoffs we would all be thrilled.   But end the season on a three month skid of misery and the same playoff spot just feels empty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...