Jump to content

Can AM accomplish the following this off season?


bigbird

Recommended Posts

If Mora would accept a trade to Chicago, a Mora for Vazquez deal makes sense to me.

Mora, being from Venezuela, may be able to get persuaded by Guillen to waive his NTC.

That might be a good trade, but who plays 3B. I don't think Huff is solid enough defensively to handle it on a daily basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I think "Can Mcphail do it" is an unfair question. There are so many variables to each situtation that you mention, some of which are completely out of Mcphails control....

I can agree with this to a certain extent, but why can other teams complete these tasks when we cannot?????????? I get the impression this FO can only work on one major item at any one time. As long as we are unable to accomplish a set of predetermined goals, this team will never be a winner again. I don't know about anyone else on this board, but when I have set of goals to accomplish annually in my job, and they do not get accomplished - I am considered a 'Needs Improvement'. Its safe to say that Andy has done some very good things here, but until this team is a winner again, I would rate its performance as a 'Needs'.... No bonus this year big boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As upset as I have been with him about his deliberate pace I do think he can get this stuff done and to me, its not as much as it looks.

Extending Markakis and BRob is easy...You should know what you want to pay and vice versa.

Sign Tex...This is the hard but still, once the market gets set you have an idea of where you need to go.

I really think we should trade for Vazquez...He is a perfect starter for us to go after and he probably won't cost us that much...We should be on the phone to the WS right now about this...If we are going to trade BRob, Vazquez should come back in the deal(which will be good because he should end up being worth at least 1 draft pick as well). And if we don't trade BRob, we should still be able to obtain him.

The second starter is a little tougher but still, same concept...Someone we can get that is either younger and cheap(Sonnanstine) or someone who is on a one year contract, either through FA or in a trade.

MiL FA for depth is easy.

The hardest part is probably the SS but should be doable.

What makes you think trading for 2 quality starting pitchers like Vazquez and Sonnanstine won't cost much?

If McPhail doesn't pull off cheap trades for these guys, you'll criticize him when you have no idea what the Rays and WS would be asking for.

Its easy to be a GM from the couch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That might be a good trade, but who plays 3B. I don't think Huff is solid enough defensively to handle it on a daily basis.

We at least have some options for third base...They may not be great options but we can at least fill the position and perhaps we can find a Greg Dobbs, Wes Helms, Casey blake type guy to hold down the fort for a year and then we can see where Snyder and Rowell are.

Getting rid of Mora, adding a good starter like vazquez and possibly getting picks(i think our chance are better with Vazquez than Mora) is more important IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes you think trading for 2 quality starting pitchers like Vazquez and Sonnanstine won't cost much?

If McPhail doesn't pull off cheap trades for these guys, you'll criticize him when you have no idea what the Rays and WS would be asking for.

Its easy to be a GM from the couch.

I said Vazquez probably won't cost much and just because you haven't followed his situation(or read the link that Ruzious posted) doesn't mean you should jump on me.

Besides, my definition of not costing much is probably different than yours. I am saying he won't cost any of our top guys...the rest of the guys are tradeable and won't be missed all that much but they could be guys that have value to a playoff contender(like Mora).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3. and 4. Guthrie seems to be a quality no. 1 or no. 2 for now. I like what I saw of this Cubs trade idea from Davearm. I don't know if Liz will get both Cedeno and Marquis. Marquis would be cheaper than Burnett. Scott could be moved. Pinella is looking for a left-handed, right fielder. This would also secure an open spot for either Montanez or Reimold to battle for LF.

And a lot worse.:eek:

I hope AM doesn't see Marquis as a replacement for Burnett. I hope AM won't want Marquis at all. Didn't SG just make a post about NOT signing middling talent for big dollars? Did most not agree with that? Spend a little bit more and get someone good or let someone young and cheap give it a go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not agree with this on two counts.

One, Huff does not command $15M off of one good year.

Two, noone is going to give Huff a five year contract when has foundered for 2 or the last 3 years.

I think after the O's miss on Tex they offer Huff 2/25 with a club option and he takes it.

That would be paying decent money for mediocre FA's, just the thing we need to avoid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Extend Markakis

Extend Roberts

Trade Hernandez

Acquire starting pitcher #1

Acquire starting pitcher #2

Acquire a starting 1B

Acquire a starting SS

Sign quality minor league free agents for depth

=========

Seems like a lot for the pace he works at. We need to all of the above. Can AM handle it???? I was told he's working very hard at this time...

I think Markakis extension comes soon. Roberts may take a little longer as he will want to see how the team is shaping up.

Trading Hernandez could be the toughest move possibly second only to signing Tex.

I'm hoping we sign Burnett and trade for someone like Vasquez.

Sign Tex. If he's out, I would look real hard at trading Roberts but it doesn't sound like AM is thinking the same thing.

I think Cedeno is one of the more likely target for SS that won't cost a ton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think perhaps the very next move will be to sign a quality pitcher. Doing that will help convince Tex we are serious. Suddenly he sees a team that has invested some serious money before they even get to him.QUOTE]

I think this is the key to having any chance to sign Tex without grossly overpaying. Tex and Roberts want to win, which won't happen without improved pitching. A Burnettl-like signing and a Nick extension says we are serious. I bet Roberts waits until we get Tex before extending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, i was mistaken...Vazquez has 2 years left on his contract...Probably could get him even cheaper.

OK...looking at Chaos' posted article...what else could we expect from Chicago in a Roberts deal? I'm assuming that Vazquez would come back in that deal.

Don't they have a very good 2nd base prospect who's a year or two away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK...looking at Chaos' posted article...what else could we expect from Chicago in a Roberts deal? I'm assuming that Vazquez would come back in that deal.

Don't they have a very good 2nd base prospect who's a year or two away?

Talked about this the other day....Swisher seemed to have fallen out of favor as well.

I would try to do some kind of deal where they get BRob and we get Vazquez, Swisher and Getz.

Obviously, we would need to include more...Because of salary, i would ask them take back Walker or if he will accept a deal to the White Sox, Mora.

If it is Mora, we may not have to include anything else.

If it is Walker, we would have to include something else....Could see that being many things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I'm glad it's all about reverence for valued members of the team instead of trying to win.  Mullins has been terrible offensively and should see some serious bench time until he starts hitting at least some.
    • When Markakis was Beavers’ age he was putting up a .799 OPS in the majors.  
    • But Mountcastle probably wasn't going to ever get up to tie it...I mean, maybe he would have, but after Gunnar you had Adley who was going to hit lefty, then you had lefty O'Hearn.  And then Tony who was gonna hit lefty if he had a chance to hit had the game not been decided yet.   So because Hyde was a slave to the righty/lefty matchup, he left his best bat on the bench.  And he would have for the rest of the inning had things gone differently.  He wouldn't pinch hit for Westy.  He probably wouldn't pinch hit for Cowser.  You'd have to wait until extra innings when Hays, Mullins and Mateo got up to bat to find a spot to put Mounty in there, so why not just do it in the 9th somewhere? I don't consider Stowers a viable bench bat in that situation.  I can see why some would, I just don't see it right now.  125 at bats in the majors, 43 strikeouts, and 8 walks.   Mateo...not a good hitter overall, but has been surprisingly decent lately.  And you want to get him on base because of his speed, he can score from first.  I don't see how Stowers for him is a great swap...but like Mullins being so bad, I don't think Stowers had much of a chance right there despite being a lefty.  Stowers hasn't flashed much at all in his time in the big leagues...now part of that is because he hasn't received consistent playing time but that's another debate for another thread. Getting back to Mullins being an automatic out, I'd have preferred to see Stowers hit for Mullins if Hyde was so hell bent on getting Stowers in there.  I'd have let Mateo take his chances. I'm not comping Mateo and Mullins offensively.  What I am saying is that I don't think Hyde wanted to pinch hit for Mullins in that spot because he's a veteran leader on the team and he doesn't want to show that he doesn't have confidence in him....despite Mullins having given every reason to not have confidence in him for awhile now. I'm saying that Mateo, despite being a severely flawed offensive player, has been a relatively important part of the team these past couple years and he's done everything he's been asked to do with a smile on his face.  Stowers for Mateo, even though it was the right move from a matchup perspective wasn't a good move for political/clubhouse reasons.  Pinch hitting someone who's barely broken his rookie status for a vet like Mateo?  I dunno, I didn't like it.    
    • There are a lot of bad teams in the league like @eddie83 mentioned and I have to think one of them will take a flyer on Baumann. I'd prefer he slip through waivers because there's a decent chance we could use him as a mop up pitcher later this summer.
    • I’d take that. 
    • Agreed on all but the 2030 timeline. Clear evidence for all to see, on every pitch, is unsustainable at this rate. With improvements in the tech, a solution must come sooner. 
    • Cal is only going to be around for public relations with the fans. Elias isn't going to put up with Cal trying to interfere with baseball operations and I don't see Rubenstein listening to Cal's input on how to run the team like we did with Brady Anderson and the Angelos family.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...