Jump to content

Norfolk catchers find something they like in the water


wildcard

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, bpilktree said:

Severino seems to me to be a guy that could be a great leader to a team that was good.  He shows fire at times but gets very lackluster when things are not going the team or his way.  Machado did same type thing were he didn’t give full effort on the bad teams.  

Yeah, I can understand why he he was lackluster when Means was throwing a perfect game and didn’t bother trying to get that ball in the dirt. Things were going really awful...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Yeah, I can understand why he he was lackluster when Means was throwing a perfect game and didn’t bother trying to get that ball in the dirt. Things were going really awful...

It was the third inning and he just went to catch it instead of blocking it.  It was not an effort play just a technique that happens sometimes at catcher.  A ball breaks or moves more then you suspect and you use wrong technique.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

Severino seems to me to be a guy that could be a great leader to a team that was good.  He shows fire at times but gets very lackluster when things are not going the team or his way.  Machado did same type thing were he didn’t give full effort on the bad teams.  

I'd think an actual leader wouldn't downshift his effort because the team he was on wasn't competitive.

At least not in April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bpilktree said:

It was the third inning and he just went to catch it instead of blocking it.  It was not an effort play just a technique that happens sometimes at catcher.  A ball breaks or moves more then you suspect and you use wrong technique.

 

 

 

 

Yea!  I'm sure if it was the ninth inning of a perfect game Severino would have tried harder!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Yea!  I'm sure if it was the ninth inning of a perfect game Severino would have tried harder!

Again watch it he played it wrong. I actually think he got crossed up.  He jumps outside on a curve ball that is breaking down and in.  A lack of effort doesn’t have you move the wrong direction. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

It was the third inning and he just went to catch it instead of blocking it.  It was not an effort play just a technique that happens sometimes at catcher.  A ball breaks or moves more then you suspect and you use wrong technique.

I have to completely disagree here. He didn’t put in the EFFORT to get his body infront of the ball. He has 2 passed balls and 15 wild pitches, the large majority of them ones that a catcher who put effort in could have kept infront of them or stopped, instead of just “ole”ing them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

Severino seems to me to be a guy that could be a great leader to a team that was good.  He shows fire at times but gets very lackluster when things are not going the team or his way.  Machado did same type thing were he didn’t give full effort on the bad teams.  

Is that a leader or a frontrunner? It's way easier to step up for a team that's winning. How a player handles the down spells is what makes them. Hopefully he can turn it around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

LOL. There is more to defense than passed balls. How you call a game, caught stealing %, etc.

Which of the Orioles catchers have had the better “caught stealing” number? Also...Calling the game isn’t too impressive with teams scoring 7+ runs the majority of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Which of the Orioles catchers have had the better “caught stealing” number? Also...Calling the game isn’t too impressive with teams scoring 7+ runs the majority of the time.

To me game calling falls on the coaching staff.  They should be the ones preparing the battery for the game. 

We are well past the age when catchers were required to memorize hitter tendencies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

I have to completely disagree here. He didn’t put in the EFFORT to get his body infront of the ball. He has 2 passed balls and 15 wild pitches, the large majority of them ones that a catcher who put effort in could have kept infront of them or stopped, instead of just “ole”ing them.

He slides to the outside on that pitch and starts to stand up which makes me think he thought a different pitch was coming. There are plenty of plays he gives lack of effort I just don’t believe that was one of them the way he moves his body.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bpilktree said:

Again watch it he played it wrong. I actually think he got crossed up.  He jumps outside on a curve ball that is breaking down and in.  A lack of effort doesn’t have you move the wrong direction. 

 

Shrug.  I just remember Platinum Glove era Wieters just smothering everything in the dirt. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

LOL. There is more to defense than passed balls. How you call a game, caught stealing %, etc.

Both of our catchers are awful. Arguing which one is less awful, or more awful if you prefer, is choosing which deck chair is more comfortable on the titanic. Get rid of both of them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...