Jump to content

My 2021 Midseason Report Card


Frobby

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

@Frobby, this was an excellent writeup.  Can't disagree with any of your grades and summaries.  Very well done.

Oh my, how you've quickly turned on Valaika!

I still think the same about Valaika that I thought over the winter.   If they play him as  a part time player is does not hits well.  If they play him full time he probably hit well  But so far this season they have played him half time.  So he will not hit well playing that way.

I thought Valaika would be a better overall 2B than Sanchez.  Sanchez is gone.  I thought Valaika was a better overall 2B than Ruiz. Ruiz is gone.  I thought Valaika was a better 2B than  Urias.   Defensively that is probably true.  Offensively  the O's would have to play Valaika as a everyday 2B for him to  be better.  But that does not seem like it will happen.  

I never said Valaika was a long term answer for the O's,  Just better than the others they had at 2B.

And I will stand by the statement that  Valaika  is still with the O's because they don't than anyone better.  At least not yet.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I still think the same about Valaika that I thought over the winter.   If they play him as  a part time player is does not hits well.  If they play him full time he probably hit well  But so far this season they have played him half time.  So he will not hit well playing that way.

I thought Valaika would be a better overall 2B than Sanchez.  Sanchez is gone.  I thought Valaika was a better overall 2B than Ruiz. Ruiz is gone.  I thought Valaika was a better 2B than  Urias.   Defensively that is probably true.  Offensively  the O's would have to play Valaika as a everyday 2B for him to  be better.  But that does not seem like it will happen.  

I never said Valaika was a long term answer for the O's,  Just better than the others they had at 2B.

And I will stand by the statement that  Valaika  is still with the O's because they don't than anyone better.  At least not yet.

In a 31 game stretch from April 27 to May 31, Valaika played in 27 games, starting 19 of them.   Then from June 8 to yesterday, he played in 19 of 22 games, starting 15.    That is plenty of playing time.   I’m sick of hearing these excuses. If he played better, he’d play more.   

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Valaika, The question does deserve to be asked? Why is he still here? He doesn’t hit well enough, he doesn’t defend well enough, he’s not versatile enough, even if the guys on the farm aren’t as good, now is the time to find out. And the fans would really rather have a chance to look at somebody new even if that someone isn’t meaningfully better. 

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

In a 31 game stretch from April 27 to May 31, Valaika played in 27 games, starting 19 of them.   Then from June 8 to yesterday, he played in 19 of 22 games, starting 15.    That is plenty of playing time.   I’m sick of hearing these excuses. If he played better, he’d play more.   

Whether you are sick of it or not.  I am saying the same thing now as a did over the winter.  Starting 19 of 31 is 61%,  15 of 22 is 68%.  Neither is playing full time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Whether you are sick of it or not.  I am saying the same thing now as a did over the winter.  Starting 19 of 31 is 61%,  15 of 22 is 68%.  Neither is playing full time.

Maybe it makes sense to you, maybe it doesn't...but why would you give a guy like that full time reps when he can't hack it 61% or 68% of the time?

"Yeah, coach, I know I'm really playing poorly but I really feel that if you just give me MORE opportunities I can turn it around..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

Maybe it makes sense to you, maybe it doesn't...but why would you give a guy like that full time reps when he can't hack it 61% or 68% of the time?

"Yeah, coach, I know I'm really playing poorly but I really feel that if you just give me MORE opportunities I can turn it around..."

If I ain't playing at least 97.3% of the time I just can't get into a routine.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Maybe it makes sense to you, maybe it doesn't...but why would you give a guy like that full time reps when he can't hack it 61% or 68% of the time?

"Yeah, coach, I know I'm really playing poorly but I really feel that if you just give me MORE opportunities I can turn it around..."

IMO Because he had almost a 800 OPS last year.  That should have got him the shot to start over Sanchez, Ruiz, Wilkerson and Urias.  But the O's have not seen it that way.  Instead the O's optioned him to the alternate site in April so he didn't even play in games during that period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent job, sir! I will not argue with one thing you wrote. Thanks for that.

Hyde mentioned something a week or two ago about the competition in 2020 being very "different" than that these guys are facing in 2021. That point cannot be under-valued in the evaluation of disparate results. The only player that really disappointed me is Santander, but I think he is showing signs of coming to life with the bat. Akin and Kremer are the biggest under-achieving pitchers for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, wildcard said:

IMO Because he had almost a 800 OPS last year.  That should have got him the shot to start over Sanchez, Ruiz, Wilkerson and Urias.  But the O's have not seen it that way.  Instead the O's optioned him to the alternate site in April so he didn't even play in games during that period.

In 141 at bats, WC!!!  You're doing it again!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Better that any of  the alternatives.  You can't really argue with that. Heck three of them have been DFA'd this season.

Certainly not THAT much better.  Not head and shoulders better.  Valaika is lucky that he's not been DFA'd this season...that's not an endorsement of him, rather it's a symbol of how bad the 2nd base position is for the Orioles. 

It's not like Hanser Alberto is lighting it up this year, too.  We can critique up and down about Elias and certain moves but it's obvious he hasn't found a 2nd baseman he wants to stick with.  Again, that's not exact praise for Valaika.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Certainly not THAT much better.  Not head and shoulders better.  Valaika is lucky that he's not been DFA'd this season...that's not an endorsement of him, rather it's a symbol of how bad the 2nd base position is for the Orioles. 

It's not like Hanser Alberto is lighting it up this year, too.  We can critique up and down about Elias and certain moves but it's obvious he hasn't found a 2nd baseman he wants to stick with.  Again, that's not exact praise for Valaika.  

I agree.   I was the one who said that Valaika is only still here because the O's don't have anyone better.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Passan drew this link between Dombrowski and Elias in his big piece for this week.     That's the basic question before us as Elias has excelled setting it all up...he's playing the highest stakes games now.      Adley's 3.5 years is perhaps ballpark similar to the timeframe the Phillies' great players remain a championship caliber nucleus.     Adley's final 3 years - unless payroll grows, the opportunity for rosters with Burnes-Santander-Kimbrel level supporting players may shrink a little. It's more about ensuring a window doesn't close without a team maximizing its opportunity. In this regard, the Phillies and Orioles are quite similar, though Dombrowski's counterpart in Baltimore, Mike Elias, gets a little more leeway because the Orioles' period of contention is longer than any team's. The Phillies' isn't short, by any means, but every year Bryce Harper (31 years old), Trea Turner (31), J.T. Realmuto (33), Zack Wheeler (34) and Aaron Nola (31) age is a year closer to an inevitable downturn. That's when, as an executive in charge, you push. And when it comes to a willingness to look past what a computer system suggests is proper value and potentially overpay for talent, nobody matches Dombrowski. Robert fits the bill and fills a need. 
    • Since I currently have Basallo 3rd, guess I have to be consistent and say he would go first.  I think Mayo and Basallo have the chance to be absolute impact power bats while I think Holliday has a chance to be a very good OBP guy with some pop.  I'd only say Basallo because he has more risk than the other other two and Orioles seem to be gradually transitioning from catch to 1B (he's basically split time between C and 1B since he was allowed to throw. Saying that, Basallo may have the highest ceiling bat wise of the three.  Mayo is the safest bet because he's major league ready now and has developed that game power now. The arm strength gives him a chance to stay at 3B for a bit but even if he transitions to 1B or RF he'll have value. Holliday hit just .222 in June in AAA but had a .444 OBP because if his ability to draw walks, walks that he might not get with major league umpires until he establishes himself.  Really, I'm not trading any of them, but if I had to, it's Basallo followed by Holliday.
    • Keep Holiday and when he’s ready , install him at 2B , keep Westy at 3B , Gunnar at SS and Mayo is our 1B . Then after we’re set at infield. keep one of Urias , Mateo or Norby as our utility backup.  I love Basallo but he’s the one ( if we plan on Skubal) to sacrifice  Just my opinion 
    • my answer would be D- None of the above
    • Trade NONE of them!  Keep Holliday, Mayo, Basallo!   (I'd even try to keep Kjerstad too!).   Package Stowers, McDermott, Norby, Bradfield, Beavers and 2 other lower minors guys!  
    • The Cowser talk is interesting. He’s extremely controversial on here for a rookie who is quite literally one of the best defensive OF’ers in the MLB (98th percentile), hits for well above average power, and has been a very valuable base runner too (95th percentile). Maybe it’s because nobody expected his defense to be that great, but he’s not Kjerstad, he arguably doesn’t even need to be a league average hitter to still be a 2-3 WAR guy with his defense/base running. He can certainly be frustrating to watch sometimes and needs to improve in higher leverage situations, but when I think of the best version of this Orioles team, it certainly involves Cowser in the OF. He’s a better player with a higher ceiling and floor than either Hays or Mullins and needs to play to see if he can work through some of his issues. Cowser is not Gunnar, but through 280 PA’s last year (Cowser is at 278 right now), Gunnar was striking out 32% of the time and hitting for slightly less power than Cowser is right now. The rest of the season he struck out 20.5% of the time and hit 17 HR’s. Again, Cowser isn’t Gunnar, but there’s little reason to cut his playing time when his ceiling is being the best OF’er on the team, and his floor is likely not any worse than what they’ve gotten from Mullins the past 2 seasons. He doesn’t need to play every single game but he should certainly be playing more than Mullins and Hays.
    • My point being, injuries happen. It's almost impossible for a team to win the World Series without good pitching. The Orioles need a rotation upgrade to have a chance at the title. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...