Jump to content

Orioles signing Rougned Odor


Yardball85

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Philip said:

Gutierrez has much better D, and has the same WRC 82, Mateo and Urias have better Offense,  and Urias is a far better overall player. Odor can’t be a utility guy and he doesn’t hit better than anyone he would be supplanting.

Its not an expensive mistake but it is a useless counterproductive move that takes a spot better used by someone better.

Remember rule 1: don’t get someone unless they are better than what you already have, and he isn’t, by any stretch of the imagination.

Well what does the rest of MLB think?  We claimed Mateo, Urias, and Guiterrez off waivers. Why did the Yankees trade for Odor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Philip said:

Gutierrez has much better D, and has the same WRC 82, Mateo and Urias have better Offense,  and Urias is a far better overall player. Odor can’t be a utility guy and he doesn’t hit better than anyone he would be supplanting.

Its not an expensive mistake but it is a useless counterproductive move that takes a spot better used by someone better.

Remember rule 1: don’t get someone unless they are better than what you already have, and he isn’t, by any stretch of the imagination.

I don't think Mike is sold on Gutierrez or Mateo as every day players. It is good to have another option besides Martin. I'm not excited about this signing but it is nothing to be upset about. On the scale of negative 100 (Chris Davis) to 100 (Acuna) this is a zero, a nothing signing. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I don't think Mike is sold on Gutierrez or Mateo as every day players. It is good to have another option besides Martin. I'm not excited about this signing but it is nothing to be upset about. On the scale of negative 100 (Chris Davis) to 100 (Acuna) this is a zero, a nothing signing. 

That’s part of the problem.  Its likely nothing at best…so why do it? How about signing or trading for good players?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

He's a lousy player.  Nobody else wants him.  In other words, he's the perfect Orioles signing.    Signing him sends a message to our fans:  "We intend to suck again in 2022".

That's the issue most of us have with signing Odor. It's not the player, but it's a sign the Orioles aren't going to try and improve next year. Yes players like Adley Rutschman will help, but that can only move the needle so much. 

I'm not expecting the Orioles to contend for the playoffs in 2022, but if the goal is to compete in 2023 then this offseason we should start seeing moves to get ready. Like getting a couple quality infielders to play at 2B/SS/3B and a couple of quality pitchers.

If none of these moves happen then it's likely Elias has to accrue all this talent next offseason to compete in 2023. That is unless some of the players In the organization surprise us next year. It might end up turning into wait until 2024 to watch a good team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Well what does the rest of MLB think?  We claimed Mateo, Urias, and Guiterrez off waivers. Why did the Yankees trade for Odor?

The Yankees are not much smarter than the Rangers, they’re just much much richer.

My point remains valid, you can compare the stats of the guys you mentioned for yourself, and see which guy you’d rather have on your team. If you prefer Odor to Urias, then pop a cork, your dream has come true.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

I don't think Mike is sold on Gutierrez or Mateo as every day players. It is good to have another option besides Martin. I'm not excited about this signing but it is nothing to be upset about. On the scale of negative 100 (Chris Davis) to 100 (Acuna) this is a zero, a nothing signing. 

Unfortunately that’s not true, because you’re signing a guy to 40 man spot and paying him league minimum, instead of saving that spot and that league minimum money for someone better, And as first in line in the waiver wire, it is impossible that someone better will not come along.

It’s not a major problem, the larger problem is that this shows an extreme lack of judgment. I’ve mentioned a couple of times that rule number one is you don’t get somebody unless they’re better than what you already have, and he is clearly not.

Sports Guy was screaming about Gutierrez’s bat, and he and Odor have the same 82WRC, but Gutierrez at least has excellent defense. No, Odor offers nothing and takes a spot better saved for almost anyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

I don't think Mike is sold on Gutierrez or Mateo as every day players. It is good to have another option besides Martin. I'm not excited about this signing but it is nothing to be upset about. On the scale of negative 100 (Chris Davis) to 100 (Acuna) this is a zero, a nothing signing. 

I may not be a smart man, but if Acuña is a 100, Chris Davis is far, far less than -100.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Going back to the start of the 2018 campaign, Odor owns a .216/.291/.418 line. That’s come with worse than average strikeout and walk rates (27.8% and 7.9%, respectively), sapping much of his overall value. The Yankees acquired Odor from Texas this past spring, hoping that a move to the Bronx would reinvigorate his lefty bat.

While Odor did hit 15 homers in 361 plate appearances in pinstripes, he managed just a .202/.286/.379 line altogether.

Odor is still just 27 years old (28 in February). He’s young enough that teams can continue to hold out hope he may yet find his stride offensively, but it’s been quite some time since he was a capable everyday player.“

 

Friends, that means he sucks, and has sucked for a loooong time.

Signing him is stupid and everybody knows it except for Roch and his masters.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Not sure I understand this at all. So I guess Urias goes back to utility for the 2022 version of Maikol Franco? This seems like a deal you make last offseason. 

Call me confused.

I'm ok with this deal. It's nothing. middle infield depth with a little pop and probably cheap.

What's different in 2022 from 2021? Besides the CBA expiring, absolutely nothing. Last season we were hoping to make some organizational progress, and we didn't. Every minor league starter we brought up sucked. Period.

If Elias thinks the time is not right yet, then I trust him. Does everyone want us to go off half-cocked and spend a half a BILLION dollars like the Rangers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, scOtt said:

I'm ok with this deal. It's nothing. middle infield depth with a little pop and probably cheap.

What's different in 2022 from 2021? Besides the CBA expiring, absolutely nothing. Last season we were hoping to make some organizational progress, and we didn't. Every minor league starter we brought up sucked. Period.

If Elias thinks the time is not right yet, then I trust him. Does everyone want us to go off half-cocked and spend a half a BILLION dollars like the Rangers?

They will be using up an Adley season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • We have the best inside the Mayo family source there is.  @Roy Firestone have you heard anything about an imminent Coby Mayo promotion?
    • I don't really want to see an all in trade given the risk involved with picking up any pitcher in the game right now. I want to see if veteran players on a big contract are an option now with Rubenstein. A player like Max Scherzer should be on the table as a means to add another viable starting pitcher. I have to think under Angelos a player like Scherzer would be too expensive and a nonstarter. I'd rather pay $$$ for some high priced veterans over giving up top prospects for one pitcher that you pray doesn't get a sore elbow. 
    • I’m not an actuary. That’s @Filmstudy realm. He’s a master at calculating odds. Here’s what I will say. I think (just my two cents) that Elias should be aiming to come away from the trade deadline with a starting pitcher who is a real difference maker. And hopefully a bullpen arm or two that have power/strikeout stuff (unlike all of our relievers currently not named Kimbrel). Elias should be trying to increase our odds as high as possible. I don’t know by what percent our odds will increase. But I do know that if we add a top of the rotation type pitcher to what we have, the odds of us likely being successful against ANY TEAM in the Fall will go up. This again is just my opinion (for whatever that is worth) but it sends the right message to the players that you are invested in truly trying to get this team over the line (World Series trophy). If the message that is sent to the players continues to be “one foot in and one foot out”. I’m not sure if that is a strong appeal to ultra competitors like Gunnar and Adley. People might say well who cares what the players think? But it is probably going to play a roll (what they think/how they feel) in whether or not they are willing to re-up here longterm. And I can’t envision a version of the Orioles that is as strong and as viable to maximizing the earnings/value of the franchise without them. I’ve said this before, but I attend a lot of games and I’m around town very often. I see all of the #2 and #35 shirts on people’s backs in the stadium and around the community. Lastly, I believe that it is very important that we do right for players like Stowers and Norby. I get and I’m sure they understand that there may not be a place for them on the Baltimore Orioles. But you can’t leave guys buried at AAA for years and never give them a chance, especially when we are talking about prime years. These guys only have so many years to make money by playing the game. If you can’t use them, send them elsewhere. I have never been a big believer that you get rewarded by treating people (and that is what all the players actually are) wrong.
    • Holliday isn’t being traded lol. And I highly doubt Mayo is traded. Basallo is expendable to me. We have Adley. 
    • Seems logical with the lefties coming up. It's time. Get him a taste before the AS break, temporarily option someone, then make a deal at the deadline to jettison someone like Urias. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...