Jump to content

After 6 games


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

The RISP futility really is something to behold so far. I'm tired of saying "well, they're facing good pitching". We have a decent core of hitters - they need to start coming through in big spots. 

Fortunately, there's been a LOT of bad luck. And some poor execution, don't get me wrong. But a lot of bad luck. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, interloper said:

The RISP futility really is something to behold so far. I'm tired of saying "well, they're facing good pitching". We have a decent core of hitters - they need to start coming through in big spots. 

Fortunately, there's been a LOT of bad luck. And some poor execution, don't get me wrong. But a lot of bad luck. 

Even against good pitching hitting .100 with RISP is not acceptable. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely subjective here, but these games have all been much more interesting so far than most of last year.

 

I start putting my kids to bed at 7 and usually don't get to tune in until a little after 8. For most games last year the game wouldn't even be worth watching at that point. So far this year, every game has been worth tuning in to.

I would rather be winning and these losses have stung (a testament to how close they've been). But at least we aren't embarrassing ourselves (YET).

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, celery said:

Completely subjective here, but these games have all been much more interesting so far than most of last year.

 

I start putting my kids to bed at 7 and usually don't get to tune in until a little after 8. For most games last year the game wouldn't even be worth watching at that point. So far this year, every game has been worth tuning in to.

I would rather be winning and these losses have stung (a testament to how close they've been). But at least we aren't embarrassing ourselves (YET).

Sure there is some truth to that but you could probably pick out several 6 game stretches last year where you could have said the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Sure there is some truth to that but you could probably pick out several 6 game stretches last year where you could have said the same thing.

You're absolutely right but at least I haven't completely given up hope 6 games in. That's the scale I'm working with here... The bar is low. I know we're gonna be terrible but can we please just be exciting while we do it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, celery said:

You're absolutely right but at least I haven't completely given up hope 6 games in. That's the scale I'm working with here... The bar is low. I know we're gonna be terrible but can we please just be exciting while we do it?

Well hopefully they get Adley, Stowers, Bradish, GRod and Hall up here quickly..and maybe Westburg too.  That should ramp up the excitement.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Irony is now we face the Yankees. Irony is, they may have the worse pitching staff we have faced so far. But, we played them a well as any other AL East team last year. But, the hitting/plate discipline does look bad. Over the firat six games, I'm pleased with the pitching  -  the hitting not so much!

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I dont think it matters in the playoffs. You need a little bit of luck in a 5 or a 3 game series.
    • I don't think most of the issues with Rays attendance and engagement is because of the roster churn. It's because of the stadium, the competition from the Lightning and Bucs for entertainment dollars and the transient fanbase mostly having allegiances to other teams. 
    • Would you rather have Atlanta's roster or Texas?
    • It's been said many times already but the Rangers won with pitchers NO ONE would have said were much better than Cole Irvin last year. In addition, Atlanta lost in the NLDS despite having maybe one of the best rosters ever assembled. As for ownership,  as stated all evidence is Elias is not going chips all in on one season as much as you may want him to. Rubenstein has said hes taking a hands off approach especially in this first season as has totally faith in the front office.  Unless you want a repeat of the Duquette years, going all in, prospects be damned, is a strategy from a bygone era.
    • Is Justin Verlander toast?     Maybe the future resembles the past. In Bradish's presumed absence, he's an interesting possible character as one of the three lead SP. I do believe the Astros staggered his start this year knowing at his age 26 weeks + October is too heavy a lift.    He's presently sidelined with a sore neck after getting scratched a couple days ago (and the Astros getting routed when they had to accelerate a kiddo).  Last October he had two good games and one bad game against MIN and TEX. Astros this week have a cold/hot mix with the White Sox before us this weekend, when we might get a live look.
    • IMO because all big contracts come with various degrees of risk. The wisest course is to spend on the best/most talented player. They are the ones who most likely have the longest run of great to good in them, even if they cost the most. What you don't want to do is spend money on guys who fall off of cliffs early or are injury prone or who do not have the mentality to handle success or who do not have very strong work habits and will likely become comfortable after getting paid. That is why I think (like many others) that Gunnar is the guy you want to extend even if you have to move heaven and earth to do so. I just don't see anything in his profile/short history that are any kind of "red flags". It is likely to be worth it (at least for a long time - at least next decade). Also taking into account the momentum that the O's are riding with winning, so many young homegrown stars, and new ownership. IF they were to extend a Henderson and/or Rustchman IMO it will take the org to a new level and provide even greater momentum and fan interest/marketplace growth. That is how you become the next "big player/franchise" that can sustain winning beyond a short/6 yr team control window. I've stated before that I worry that a Rays model of ongoing rebuilding, never spending meaningfully, and never being invested enough as an org to be fully committed to winning sends the wrong message to your customer/fanbase and will never really engage a community/marketplace fully. 
    • I doubt they give him a 2-3 year deal, I do think if he's here it's because they give a QO and he takes it, which I also doubt he'd do, because someone is going to pay him more for longer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...