Jump to content

Interesting catching tidbit from Hyde


interloper

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Pickles said:

That would kinda be the thing they would keep proprietary, no?

Well, some things would be out in the open: use of pitchers, positioning of fielders, training techniques, roster construction, putting crabmeat on pretzels. Others I would hope to hear about well after the fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I've read the first. I don't know as much about Richards as I probably should. Thanks.

I thought it was clear that I am hoping there will be some innovation as well as judicious use of other teams' ideas as part of the rebuild. The baseball brilliance of 40 to 60 years isn't going to help.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3KEhWTnWvE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

I've read the first. I don't know as much about Richards as I probably should. Thanks.

I thought it was clear that I am hoping there will be some innovation as well as judicious use of other teams' ideas as part of the rebuild. The baseball brilliance of 40 to 60 years isn't going to help.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3KEhWTnWvE

I get it but I do think Richards should get more notice than he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, spiritof66 said:

Well, some things would be out in the open: use of pitchers, positioning of fielders, training techniques, roster construction, putting crabmeat on pretzels. Others I would hope to hear about well after the fact.

If you ever listen to the Patrick Jones podcast, he was a code for the Orioles last year. He never makes the podcast about the Orioles, but he often talks about a bunch of innovative stuff that they are doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, spiritof66 said:

I don't know it. Thanks.

I sympathize with those incredibly frustrated with MASN, credentials, information for fans, general relationship with non-inside people and the ML payroll, but I'm EXTREMELY optimistic about what they're doing from a position player development perspective.

That also gives me faith on what they're doing with pitching, but I just don't see as many horses on that side.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

It's an interesting strategy. It goes against what has been said for decades, but it makes sense for guys who just throw hard who might not have the best control. Instead of nibbling, just let it rip. But I wonder how this will impact arm injuries and also how much of this is based on "the crackdown."

On a side note, I remember some complaints from last season when Wynns was catching and would "move around" during the wind up and sometimes set up low (while Severino just wouldn't move unless the ball went directly to his glove.)

If he was instructed to do that (since he never did that in the Minors, ever), maybe they saw it didn't help or had some complaints about it as it WAS weird, maybe this was their way of correcting it?

I'll see if I can find it, but Glasnow did an interview about how when he first got to the Rays - they just told him to throw his best pitch in the middle of the plate. It's their big strategy at the moment, find guys with a plus pitch and just tell them to throw it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LookinUp said:

I sympathize with those incredibly frustrated with MASN, credentials, information for fans, general relationship with non-inside people and the ML payroll, but I'm EXTREMELY optimistic about what they're doing from a position player development perspective.

That also gives me faith on what they're doing with pitching, but I just don't see as many horses on that side.

Yep, this is my view of things as well, from the valid criticisms to the things to be optimistic about. 

It's easy to say they don't draft enough pitching, but at the same time, it's looking like their hit rate on position players is going to be very good. So if that's where they feel most confident in having success, go for it. When you can rattle off 7-10 draftees who are moving through the system and on target to be big leaguers, you're doing something right. Adley, Stowers, Cowser, Westburg, Henderson, Ortiz, Mayo, etc. Like it's going to be disappointing if ALL of those guys aren't decent MLers, so I think that says something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Porky said:

I'll see if I can find it, but Glasnow did an interview about how when he first got to the Rays - they just told him to throw his best pitch in the middle of the plate. It's their big strategy at the moment, find guys with a plus pitch and just tell them to throw it.

It figures the Rays would be one of the first teams to do that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Wouldn’t even consider it. I wouldn’t offer anything more than the QO
    • Adley and it’s not particularly close. I’m not writing off Adley because of a second half slump.
    • This season is far from over but that doesn't mean we can't walk and chew gum at the same time. This is going to be a very interesting offseason. The Os have a lot of spots likely secured for 2025 already and yet there is plenty of uncertainty as well. Barring a trade, these guys are definitely on the team next year: Adley, Gunnar, Holliday, Mayo*, Kjerstad, Westburg, Cowser, Urias, Eflin, GRod, Kremer, Felix, Perez, DC, Rogers and Cano.  That is 16 of your 26 man roster. The salaries for those 16 players will total around $46M, give or take. With those 16 players, you have your entire starting IF (including C), 2 OFers, 3 or 4 starting pitchers, 4 or 5 relievers (depending on Rogers) and your key bench guy. *Mayo potentially could start in the minors since he has looked  bad this year but its a SSS and I think they are committed to him and Im not sure going to the minors is going to be some major help for him.  But he will be on the active roster at some point next year. The Os also have the ability to keep (meaning they are under team control...salary estimates following player) Cedric Mullins (8.5M), Mountcastle (5.5M), OHearn (8M option), G Soto (6M), Dominguez (8M option...has 500K buyout), Mateo (3.2M), Akin (2.5M) and Webb (2.2M). For your 10 remaining roster spots, you need a back up C, 1 starting OFer, 5 pitchers and 3 other offensive players. Some of the relievers I listed will be brought back but others likely traded. Those are cheap contracts but the O's need to add another legit high leverage arm and someone(s) will be left off because of that. Either way, the team has plenty of money to add to this team given the low payroll of those definitely back.  Also, keep in mind Bradish will be on the payroll next year and I am assuming they will non tender Tyler Wells. Depending on his status, it is possible they bring him back but not sure I see the point. Having so many cheap players on the roster, many of whom will be cheap for a while, gives you so much flexibility. Also, it’s certainly possible that some of the players  I listed in the definite 16 will be traded, which will open up a spot or more.
    • Your last statement I dont believe is correct with a 2 way tie against the Tigers in this scenario. We would both be 87-75 and 30-22 in the division. It would then go to interdivison record, which I believe we would win by 2 games.
    • There's no joy up here in Suxville! 
    • Now we need to cheer for them this weekend.
    • The Elephant has been eliminated from catching the Orioles for a playoff spot, with 9 games remaining.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...