Jump to content

Mike Elias On the Verge


wildcard

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Mike Elias is on the verge… of making a move, getting a raise, gauging interest for a sell off, laughing in our faces?  What’s he on the verge of?

That’s the name of the podcast.   

I listened to it over the weekend and wildcard’s synopsis is very good.   I thought his second answer listed in the OP was the strongest statement I’ve heard from Elias that we will start shifting into spend mode next offseason.  

One comment he made about this year’s draft that wildcard didn’t mention was “this is a very good year to have the no. 1 pick.”   He feels we have some really great options at the top.   Didn’t tip his hand as to who.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

The team makes plenty of money.  Even if you want to argue that operating business expenses are all under one umbrella, which I don’t think they have ever done before and I question whether other teams do, they still have spent that money in the past.

The new money is more in the analytics, scouting, tech and international side of things..that’s not $100+M.  That’s the “cheap stuff”.

The Orioles are simply not spending more because ownership doesn’t want to.  They can dress it up, put a fancy rebuilding title on it and sell the fans on the overall plan but the bottom line is that ownership is choosing to be cheap with the ML product.

Maybe but, remember, if they spent on the major league product and got to 75-80 wins or whatever three years ago they wouldn't have Rutchsman. They wouldn't have a shot at the kid they're going to take number one overall in this upcoming draft. There is something to be said for sacrificing an insignificant number of wins today for a shot at the very best talent that can make a huge difference for years to come. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, vab said:

Maybe but, remember, if they spent on the major league product and got to 75-80 wins or whatever three years ago they wouldn't have Rutchsman. They wouldn't have a shot at the kid they're going to take number one overall in this upcoming draft. There is something to be said for sacrificing an insignificant number of wins today for a shot at the very best talent that can make a huge difference for years to come. 

Well, not really…winning is much more important depending on how you are doing it.

That said, I am much more concerned with this year and the tank strategy vs years past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

That’s the name of the podcast.   

I listened to it over the weekend and wildcard’s synopsis is very good.   I thought his second answer listed in the OP was the strongest statement I’ve heard from Elias that we will start shifting into spend mode next offseason.  

One comment he made about this year’s draft that wildcard didn’t mention was “this is a very good year to have the no. 1 pick.”   He feels we have some really great options at the top.   Didn’t tip his hand as to who.  
 

 

I am looking forward to seeing @Sports Guy's meltdown when Elias goes with someone other than Jones.  This could be an all-timer!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

That’s the name of the podcast.   

I listened to it over the weekend and wildcard’s synopsis is very good.   I thought his second answer listed in the OP was the strongest statement I’ve heard from Elias that we will start shifting into spend mode next offseason.  

One comment he made about this year’s draft that wildcard didn’t mention was “this is a very good year to have the no. 1 pick.”   He feels we have some really great options at the top.   Didn’t tip his hand as to who.  
 

 

I just don’t see how we’re in a better position this offseason than we were last offseason. 2B and 3B are holes. I see us being in the same situation as we are right now. Fringe stop gaps with Gunnar and Westburg/Vavra/Prieto close. Stowers and Diaz should replace Mancini and Santander. 
 

I think we’re two years away from spending money of a FA because we don’t even know what we have yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I just don’t see how we’re in a better position this offseason than we were last offseason. 2B and 3B are holes. I see us being in the same situation as we are right now. Fringe stop gaps with Gunnar and Westburg/Vavra/Prieto close. Stowers and Diaz should replace Mancini and Santander. 
 

I think we’re two years away from spending money of a FA because we don’t even know what we have yet. 

C'mon, you're typically Mr. Optimism.

Granted, I'm inclined to agree with you but even though the offseason isn't terribly far away, there's still a lot that can happen between now and then.  I don't think Elias is the type to wheel and deal at the deadline and make significant moves, but you never know.

Gunnar could be in Baltimore next year if he keeps this up.  2B and 3B are holes but AR is going to be up soon and hopefully G-Rod, too.  Elias has to spend and get quality players on the roster around these guys, there's no other option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

C'mon, you're typically Mr. Optimism.

Granted, I'm inclined to agree with you but even though the offseason isn't terribly far away, there's still a lot that can happen between now and then.  I don't think Elias is the type to wheel and deal at the deadline and make significant moves, but you never know.

Gunnar could be in Baltimore next year if he keeps this up.  2B and 3B are holes but AR is going to be up soon and hopefully G-Rod, too.  Elias has to spend and get quality players on the roster around these guys, there's no other option.

I’m optimistic about certain players. The Kjerstad and Cowser selections are really hurting right now. The grow the bats and buy the pitching theory sounds great, but what if there is no pitching available when you go to buy?  The Means injury really hurt too. 
 

We’re probably in the same boat with Gunnar this year next time. 
 

We shouldn’t expect much in return for Santander and Mancini at the deadline. With the annual “40 man crunch” coming, I am expecting players that will not be helpful in the next 1-2 years, maybe not at all. 
 

Elias should’ve really cleared some of the dead weight of the roster in the offseason and tried to entice better stop gaps for 3B with playing time. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sportsfan8703 said:

I’m optimistic about certain players. The Kjerstad and Cowser selections are really hurting right now. The grow the bats and buy the pitching theory sounds great, but what if there is no pitching available when you go to buy?  The Means injury really hurt too. 
 

We’re probably in the same boat with Gunnar this year next time. 
 

We shouldn’t expect much in return for Santander and Mancini at the deadline. With the annual “40 man crunch” coming, I am expecting players that will not be helpful in the next 1-2 years, maybe not at all. 
 

Elias should’ve really cleared some of the dead weight of the roster in the offseason and tried to entice better stop gaps for 3B with playing time. 
 

 

I've never really fully embraced the "buy the pitching" philosophy.  Simply because it's usually ****ing expensive and while this team has spent money in the past it's never spent money like THAT.  Especially for pitching.

I agree with your stance on this past offseason.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I've never really fully embraced the "buy the pitching" philosophy.  Simply because it's usually ****ing expensive and while this team has spent money in the past it's never spent money like THAT.  Especially for pitching.

I agree with your stance on this past offseason.  

I expect the pitching to be bought primarily with prospects through trades, not with money.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I've never really fully embraced the "buy the pitching" philosophy.  Simply because it's usually ****ing expensive and while this team has spent money in the past it's never spent money like THAT.  Especially for pitching.

I agree with your stance on this past offseason.  

The Astros also got really lucky that Verlander went from looking done in Detroit to completely turning it around. Morton was a completely different pitcher too. How often is a guy like Gerritt Cole in his prime available?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

I expect the pitching to be bought primarily with prospects through trades, not with money.

Should be bought with vets like Mullins  but I agree that the pitching comes through trades and lucky signings, like MGon or Chen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

That’s the name of the podcast.   

I listened to it over the weekend and wildcard’s synopsis is very good.   I thought his second answer listed in the OP was the strongest statement I’ve heard from Elias that we will start shifting into spend mode next offseason.  

One comment he made about this year’s draft that wildcard didn’t mention was “this is a very good year to have the no. 1 pick.”   He feels we have some really great options at the top.   Didn’t tip his hand as to who.  
 

 

It might be true but I would expect him to say that about the draft regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The tiebreakers are weird because we could get 2 wins vs Tigers/Twins and clinch the playoff spot but could also get 3 wins and not make the playoffs.  
    • Nope.  Too many years.  I agree with giving him the QO and letting him walk.  I might entertain a 2-3 year deal, but that's the most I'd go.
    • Yes I should have said by inter division we hold tie breaker on both if head to head.  3 way tie we would finish ahead of Tigers but behind Twins but still get in.   So the magic number is really 5 but with asterisk on that because it could be 4 with the right 2 wins vs Tigers or Twins.  
    • Whatever seems to be possibly ailing Adley, IMO looks like it only affects him when hitting.  He sprang up outta his crouch like a Jack-in-the-Box and hustled for that foul pop/bunt yesterday and did not look like he was suffering any ill effects. But what do I know?  🤔🤣  
    • Wouldn’t even consider it. I wouldn’t offer anything more than the QO
    • Adley and it’s not particularly close. I’m not writing off Adley because of a second half slump.
    • This season is far from over but that doesn't mean we can't walk and chew gum at the same time. This is going to be a very interesting offseason. The Os have a lot of spots likely secured for 2025 already and yet there is plenty of uncertainty as well. Barring a trade, these guys are definitely on the team next year: Adley, Gunnar, Holliday, Mayo*, Kjerstad, Westburg, Cowser, Urias, Eflin, GRod, Kremer, Felix, Perez, DC, Rogers and Cano.  That is 16 of your 26 man roster. The salaries for those 16 players will total around $46M, give or take. With those 16 players, you have your entire starting IF (including C), 2 OFers, 3 or 4 starting pitchers, 4 or 5 relievers (depending on Rogers) and your key bench guy. *Mayo potentially could start in the minors since he has looked  bad this year but its a SSS and I think they are committed to him and Im not sure going to the minors is going to be some major help for him.  But he will be on the active roster at some point next year. The Os also have the ability to keep (meaning they are under team control...salary estimates following player) Cedric Mullins (8.5M), Mountcastle (5.5M), OHearn (8M option), G Soto (6M), Dominguez (8M option...has 500K buyout), Mateo (3.2M), Akin (2.5M) and Webb (2.2M). For your 10 remaining roster spots, you need a back up C, 1 starting OFer, 5 pitchers and 3 other offensive players. Some of the relievers I listed will be brought back but others likely traded. Those are cheap contracts but the O's need to add another legit high leverage arm and someone(s) will be left off because of that. Either way, the team has plenty of money to add to this team given the low payroll of those definitely back.  Also, keep in mind Bradish will be on the payroll next year and I am assuming they will non tender Tyler Wells. Depending on his status, it is possible they bring him back but not sure I see the point. Having so many cheap players on the roster, many of whom will be cheap for a while, gives you so much flexibility. Also, it’s certainly possible that some of the players  I listed in the definite 16 will be traded, which will open up a spot or more.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...