Jump to content

Monday, May 16: Norfolk Tides take on Yankees at Camden Yards


SteveA

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, SteveA said:

The 4-9 hitters in the Orioles lineup have the following OPSs:

  • .556
  • .548
  • .536
  • .653
  • .445
  • .334

And the two healthy players on the bench have OPSs of .480 and .481.

That is truly amazing.   Maybe you see something like that a week into the season on a team off to a horrible start, but I have to wonder if it has ever happened with a team 30+ games into the season (paging @DrungoHazewood for some Cleveland Spider history?).

That would be a pretty involved search, trying to find OPSes through May 16th or 30+ games into the season.  Not sure you can do that with Stathead, I'd have to do a bunch of exporting to Excel.  Also, Retrosheet/bb-ref doesn't have box scores and splits going back to the 1800s yet.

The 1910 White Sox finished the year with eight players who had an OPS under .550 in at least 200 PAs. The 1886 Orioles had seven, and they only had nine players get 200 PAs.

The '99 Spiders ended with just one regular with an OPS under .550.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Morgan423 said:

Wow. 

We work really hard to not score in situations that have a historic 85% scoring rate. 🤦‍♂️

Never doubt the Orioles ability to not score runs with runners in scoiring position.

I hate to be so blunt, but at the end of the day, there's a reason why this team has lost histroic amounts of games with the same "core" of veteran players. They lost in the minors and they lose in the majors.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That would be a pretty involved search, trying to find OPSes through May 16th or 30+ games into the season.  Not sure you can do that with Stathead, I'd have to do a bunch of exporting to Excel.  Also, Retrosheet/bb-ref doesn't have box scores and splits going back to the 1800s yet.

The 1910 White Sox finished the year with eight players who had an OPS under .550 in at least 200 PAs. The 1886 Orioles had seven, and they only had nine players get 200 PAs.

The '99 Spiders ended with just one regular with an OPS under .550.

The fact that you’re comparing this lineup against dead ball era teams say all you need to know about the Orioles hitters tonight. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
    • 1. Where on the spectrum should Elias anchor between “let the kids play” vs. “sign proven bats”? 2. How do we get a right-handed bat to come here given Walltimore? 3. How many years do you think we should be willing to commit to a starting pitcher?  Where do you expect Elias to fall? 4. Between vets, rookies, and prospects, who can we trade / should we trade / do we trade for pitching or a bat? 5. What budget will ownership give to Elias? To what extent will he max out on his constraint? 6. What coaching and front-office personnel changes should/will we make? What about infrastructure or changes to org philosophies? 7. Whom, if anyone, should we try to extend, considering their agent and what they will likely demand financially?  8. For backup catcher, do we re-up McCann or go in a different direction? 9. Does it make sense to sign a blue chip reliever given the spotty track record of those signings (e.g., of 25 relievers signing for > $3MM last year, 2 had WAR of at least 0.5 in both fWAR and bWAR)? 10. Does Elias make any outside-the-box moves  (e.g., convert Akin to SP, sign a FA infielder, move JH to CF, find the next Suarez)?
    • Hope to take my kids but it will depend on the ticket prices.  I couldn’t believe how expensive the tickets were when they were in DC
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...