Jump to content

Keegan Akin is giving me an Arthur Rhodes vibe!


JimGinSP

Recommended Posts

Short memories.  Akin, especially the year he and Kremer came up would have innings like last night, sometimes 2 or 3 consecutively, where he would dominate, spot his fastball, show a plus change with command.  He couldn't do it consistently for a whole game let alone from start to start.  It's always been there but now he can let it all hang out for 2-3 innings.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

I've probably been the biggest Akin critic and I'm happy to be eating crow.  He's been fantastic this year.

 

What was that phrase you used to use to describe him in the game threads?   I remember it had the word apple in it but I'm drawing a blank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Yeah when you see Akin dominate like he has it's tempting to think about putting him in the starting rotation. But he's having success for the first time in his career and it's best to not mess with it. 

The Orioles bullpen has been a mess the past few years and it's turning a corner this season. Putting Akin back into the starting rotation has the potential to hurt the bullpen and the starting rotation so just let him be. 

 

I’ve said this a few times, but I feel Akin’s success this year is not just because he’s changed roles.  His big problem used to be nibbling and taking too many pitches to get though an inning.  It was difficult for him to get through 5 IP in less than 95-100 pitches.   But this year, he’s attacking hitters from the get go.  Someone posted a link showing that Akin ranks fourth in slider locstion+.   His strike percentage is at 71% compared to 65.5% last year.  He’s averaging 3.78 P/PA this year compared to 4.14 last year; 14.3 P/IP compared to 18.6.    So for all those reasons, I think he might do just fine if he returned to a a starting role.   

But at the same time, the role he’s in now is extremely valuable.   It’s not like we’re using him as a LOOGY, or even as a short reliever.   He’s on pace to give us 100+ innings.   He’s making life a lot easier on the rest of the bullpen by going 2-3 innings at a clip.  Even if he did pretty well as a starter, I’m not sure he’d have more value than he’s had already this year.  So, I wouldn’t mess with it.   
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

What was that phrase you used to use to describe him in the game threads?   I remember it had the word apple in it but I'm drawing a blank.

Pudgy Faced Applejohn.

https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/b409b0e0-079d-4f91-960d-03bf48dfa148

 

5 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Man, it was almost like someone was saying since he was in Bowie that his stuff might play up in shorter stints and he could end up a great Arthur Rhodes-like reliever.

 

Drungo?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Man, it was almost like someone was saying since he was in Bowie that his stuff might play up in shorter stints and he could end up a great Arthur Rhodes-like reliever.

 

You must have planted the vibe in my subconscious!   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going into the season, I thought Baumann was going to fill the Arthur Rhodes role.  Just as happy if Akin can fill it.  Rhodes’ role was so important in the mid-90’s.  He filled the 5th-7th innings so well.  Then it was Orosco and Randal K to close it out.  We’re starting to build clear roles in the pen.  This has been probably the biggest area of excitement for me this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SteveA said:

What was that phrase you used to use to describe him in the game threads?   I remember it had the word apple in it but I'm drawing a blank.

I have no clue what Corn called him, but I dubbed him Kookenhaken. Say Keegan Akin fast to the tune of the song. It's very similar. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So why can’t we go back to Akin as a SP again?  If it doesn’t work, it doesn’t work. It’s not going to ruin his career. It’s like how in football people think you can’t go back to the backup QB after he’s failed, but you can. I say throw an opener out there and let Akin come in and pitch innings 2-5. Let’s see what we have. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I hope that Elias is not that dogmatic when it comes to FA pitching acquisitions. If you don't draft them and you don't sign them, you are limiting top pitching acquisitions to come only via trade. That strategy is not sustainable. Another Burnes type trade will hurt us bad. I would to go after any of the first four names on your "not in play" list. If we are letting Burnes walk out the door, most of these names cannot give you anywhere near the production and you will likely be at a disadvantage come game 1 in the playoffs. Some of the names from your "possible free agents" list should not even be considered IMO. Max Scherzer/Justin Verlander/Alex Cobb are all the end of the line and are very likely to be injured just like they were this season and the season before that. Those guys need to retire. Again, if you are not going to fish at the deep end the pool, then we will probably need two guys from your "possible free agent targets" list. Maybe Eovaldi +Montas? It's not great but gives us a shot to have a deeper rotation to go along with Eflin, Rodriguez, and Kremer. Then maybe you get Bradish back for the postseason? Maybe?
    • I’m pretty confident in saying that he won’t be the consensus #1 prospect like the others were.
    • A question precedes #2: when will the left field wall be fixed?  I think I remember Elias saying they probably went too far, which is quite literally true.  No reason they can't fix it quickly.  I had no problem with them moving it back but it is pretty absurd where it is.
    • On #3, I would guess that Elias is very wary about going longer than 3 years for a starting pitcher (maybe four years if pitcher is younger and AAV is favorable).  I think Mike and Sig believe the history of long-term SP deals isn’t favorable and the wrong deal could derail a mid-market team with dead money.  I’m not sure they are wrong (e.g., Patrick Corbin, Strasberg).   I don’t think ownership cares directly; I would guess they just give Elias an annual baseball ops budget and forecast and he can choose how he manages against that.   Not in play Gerrit Cole Corbin Burnes Max Fried Blake Snell Jack Flaherty    Possible free agent targets Yusei Kikuchi Nathan Eovaldi Nick Pivetta Sean Manaea Luis Severino Alex Cobb Max Scherzer Justin Verlander Jose Quintana Frankie Montas Spencer Turnbull Andrew Heaney Matthew Boyd   Possible trade targets Garret Crotchet Sandy Alcantera Jesus Luzardo Eduardo Cabrera Reid Detmers Emerson Hancock Jordan Montgomery Lance McCullers Jr.
    • Is Webb anything special.  I would rather replace Webb with Norfolk shuttle guy.
    • Our SS is Gunnar, our CF in this scenario would be Cowser, and C is Adley. Hopefully none of those guys are in contention for being the team's worst hitter next season. We don't need a power bat in LF - we need to add a good contact bat, that can use all fields and run.
    • Kemp was part of it but bringing back 2 UTIL IF is blocking your best prospect when your manager covets veteranosity. If they aren’t resigned then Holliday gets a longer leash. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...