Jump to content

What do you want to see with picks 33, 42, 67


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Slight variation.  I would not take too many guys who were college relievers.   I'd take starting pitchers who didn't perform but had pretty good stuff and convert them to relievers.

I've been saying for years that I would be targeting college pitchers in rounds 4-6 with the idea of making relievers out of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I've been saying for years that I would be targeting college pitchers in rounds 4-6 with the idea of making relievers out of them.

I know.  I think the reasoning here originally was to take underslots,  college seniors, in rounds 6-10 so you can use that money saved in rounds 1-5.   You can receive full credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I've been saying for years that I would be targeting college pitchers in rounds 4-6 with the idea of making relievers out of them.

I don’t get why we don’t see more of this. These guys will cost you nothing. Put all your money into your top 3 or 4 picks And draft a bunch of guys with no leverage who will be happy to sign for 50-200k.  
 

Treat the draft like you do Intl signings.  A few signings and then a bunch of 5 and 6 figure guys.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t get why we don’t see more of this. These guys will cost you nothing. Put all your money into your top 3 or 4 picks And draft a bunch of guys with no leverage who will be happy to sign for 50-200k.  
 

Treat the draft like you do Intl signings.  A few signings and then a bunch of 5 and 6 figure guys.

I'm at a loss.

There has to be some reason teams don't do it but I can't figure out why they don't.

Not like the hit rate is good in those rounds anyway.

If you get lucky you get a bullpen piece a year out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm at a loss.

There has to be some reason teams don't do it but I can't figure out why they don't.

Not like the hit rate is good in those rounds anyway.

If you get lucky you get a bullpen piece a year out of it.

Yep..not only that, they can move fast. 
 

There are probably around 10 roster spots where you should be paying next to no money for on the ML Roster and getting guys to help fill those types of spots in those later rounds should be the goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Mazur from Iowa is still there at 42 they should  grab him.  If he is still there at 67 it is a no brainer.  WHIP under 1, Big Ten pitcher of the year.  9.4K/9. Apparently still has room to fill out physically.  O’s need pitching since Elias has focused so much on position players in previous drafts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, pdiddy said:

Where does Ben Joyce realistically go? MLB has him at 112 but I’m guessing someone takes an earlier flyer.

I saw someone thinking he could go within the first 60 or so picks because some team falls in love with 105.

But that is too high for him.  I would be happy to get him with the third round pick.(depending on what else is there of course)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My choices:

#33 - Owen Murphy RHP HS - (Overslot likely) or Peyton Graham SS - Oklahoma or Jacob Melton OF Oregon St

#42 - College Pitcher that may fall :  Connor Prielipp (unlikely) or Gabriel Hughes or Carson Whisenhunt

#67 - College Pitcher -  Does Landon Sims fall this far?  Trystan Vierling RHP Gonzaga or Ben Joyce RHP Tennessee

#81 - Jake Madden RHP - NW Florida State JC or Jack O’Connor RHP HS

 

The plan appears to have been to load up on collegiate position players that all have above average OPS.  Find out who rises to the top and likely use some of the excess to acquire pitching prospects down the road.  I hope Elias and Sig pivot to pitching this draft, but I am perfectly fine with the strategy to overstock the hitting prospects as long as we are going to spend or trade for quality pitching.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RVAOsFan said:

I think everyone is tired of discussing 1:1, that horse has been beaten.

What do you want to see the O’s do with the other picks they have tomorrow night? Any strategy or specific players?

I think they should follow a BPA available strategy but when it is close I would like to see us draft pitchers, I think the system could use a couple college pitchers who move fast.

If he drops to 33 I would love to grab Carson Whisenhunt from ECU. He was suspended this year for PED’s but I am ready to over look that.  He is a lefty who throws 95, might have the best change up in the draft and throws a nasty curve ball. 
 

What do you want to see?

 

Pitching, pitching, more pitching! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I don’t get why we don’t see more of this. These guys will cost you nothing. Put all your money into your top 3 or 4 picks And draft a bunch of guys with no leverage who will be happy to sign for 50-200k.  
 

Treat the draft like you do Intl signings.  A few signings and then a bunch of 5 and 6 figure guys.

Elias has already done this in two drafts. 

The first time, he drafted two relievers with top ten picks(one from Oregon and the other from North Dakota), gave them each $10,000 and I guess must have told them to have a nice life.

The second time, he drafted three players in the top ten, gave two of them $10,000 and the other $5,000.

In both instances, he was getting more money available for overslots.

I've often wondered what Elias told these players. On the one hand, it would be embarrassing for them to be told to take the money and run, but they likely weren't expecting to be drafted and those amounts of money would be the easiest money they ever made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ll be curious to see if Bobby Zmarzlak, the UMD outfielder who was an unsigned late-round high school pick for us in 2019, might draw Elias’s interest again. Zmarzlak is a local (for me—CT) kid whom many regarded as a potential third-round talent, if memory serves. Just finished his junior year at Maryland, so I assume he is draft-eligible. Numbers look OK but not spectacular for a college hitter: .291/.403/.526 in 62 games with 15 home runs and a 12 percent walk rate. Strikes out in about a third of his plate appearances. Anybody who follows Terps baseball have an eye on him over the past couple of years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chaka Garcia said:

Any predictions for these slots? Maybe top guys drop and a few teams make dumb picks like Kumar.

Certainly we've come to the couple hours of hoping for as many Frank Mozzicato randoms as the Clubs can think up.

And of course all of them they have more data than Kiley, Callis, etc.     But I'll nonetheless have a little extra energy if pick 33 is somebody who was like Kiley's 19th best available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Why does everybody want to jump and label a kid so fast? What is this, his 2nd major-league season? Yes, certainly they shouldn't go into next year thinking he's a lock for 30+ starts and 180-200 innings but we can't say he's already reached his peak either. 
    • And their defense is very good. To put things in perspective, the Tigers collective dWAR is +0.5. The Orioles is -2.8. Minnesota -4.1, Yankees -0.3, Houston -0.1, Seattle +2.0, Royals at +2.5. The Royals really standout as most of that value is driven by Fermin (catcher) and Witt.  But I think my point is that the Tigers have excellent pitching (starting pitching and bullpen) as well as excellent defense. And they're not putrid with the bats.  I would say the one saving grace about the Tigers is they don't run much. 
    • We could have easily swept Detroit in Baltimore, the lineup we have now is not the lineup they faced. It doesn't matter who the opponent is, just win.
    • Both of them are important to consider here. They could have a mediocre offense every single game of the season, but if the pitching is elite (and it is!), it'll carry them.  We have 6 games against the Tigers this year. And yes, most of them were without the cadre of regulars. But here are the offensive numbers against them: .211/.282/.392 - .674 OPS They scored 20 runs in 6 games against them. Barely scraping 3 R/G. And a good portion of them coming in *1* game.  Out of the WC potentials the O's could face, here are their R/G: Royals: 29 in 6 games = 4.8 R/G Twins: 22 in 3 = 7.3 R/G Mariners: 27 in 6 = 4.5 R/G Tigers: 20 in 6 = 3.3 R/G Out of all the playoff teams, the best RA/G are the Mariners (3.75), Guardians (3.85), and Tigers (4.96). For the playoffs, you want to look at who you're facing on the bump. Which team scares you the most? Because if you can't hit against the team, it doesn't matter what the opposing offense is.  Also you'll want to consider the best fielding teams, too.   Seems to me you'd want to face the team you matchup best against *and* who has the worst defense and worst pitching, because presumably your 3 starters (Burnes, Eflin, Kremer) should be able to hold teams in check. 
    • I'd prefer Detroit - they've been so hot for so long they should be due to cool off. KC has been just the opposite. 
    • I'd say the Royals...pitch around Witt and Salvy Perez who seems to have had our number in recent years.  The rest of their lineup isn't too imposing. Wacha  -a guy I wanted this offseason and was laughed at for wanting him- has a 2.64 ERA over his last 15 starts.  He's the soft-tossing type that gives our lineup fits and, IIRC, he was great against us earlier this year.  Lugo has had a great year, so has Ragans.  Their starters are good. But they're 3-7 over their last 10 while the Tigers are 8-2.  A lot of the postseason, IMO, is catching teams at the right/wrong time.  This could all change by next week but the Tigers are hot, the Royals are not... Then again, I said I wanted to face Texas in the first round last year and look what happened.  So who knows.  
    • Would much rather face KC and to me it’s not close.    game 1 agains Skubal is an L. They’ve proven they can beat us with a bullpen game, a bullpen only behind CLE as best in the AL.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...