Jump to content

Trade Deadline Primer/Thread


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, btdart20 said:

Nope.  Snell would be better than any of our current healthy starters.

Giving up Santader, which I believe was proposed earlier, would make us worse.  Santandar has more WAR this season in 4 months than ANY season of Snell's entire career- with the exception of his Cy Young year, which was 5 years ago.

And just FYI, BWAR has Lyles as twice as valuable as Snell for this year, and Tyler Wells 8x.  Hell, Voth has been 3x.

Snell's not that good.  He's always hurt.  And he's way over paid.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pickles said:

Giving up Santader, which I believe was proposed earlier, would make us worse.  Santandar has more WAR this season in 4 months than ANY season of Snell's entire career- with the exception of his Cy Young year, which was 5 years ago.

And just FYI, BWAR has Lyles as twice as valuable as Snell for this year, and Tyler Wells 8x.  Hell, Voth has been 3x.

Snell's not that good.  He's always hurt.  And he's way over paid.  

We can call up Stowers to replace Santander. The trade makes us better overall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Aglets said:

I'm sure you are largely correct here............but also bear in mind Hader has been exactly replacement level this year in bWAR.  Maybe MIL thinks he is on his way out.  shrug

He had two awful games which is probably the reason why is WAR is lower then it really should be.  When you don't pitch lot of innings easier for outlier to really effect your numbers.  He gave up 9 runs and 4 homers in 1/3 of an inning over a two game stretch.  The other 34 innings he has given up 7 runs and 3 homers total.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, waroriole said:

We can call up Stowers to replace Santander. The trade makes us better overall. 

Or, hear me out, we could trade Santander for somebody who is actually good, and isn't way over paid, and still call up Stowers.  Crazy, right?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bpilktree said:

He had two awful games which is probably the reason why is WAR is lower then it really should be.  When you don't pitch lot of innings easier for outlier to really effect your numbers.  He gave up 9 runs and 4 homers in 1/3 of an inning over a two game stretch.  The other 34 innings he has given up 7 runs and 3 homers total.  

Not pitching a lot of innings seems kinda like one of his main problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, waroriole said:

His FIP is 3.56. His xERA is 3.47. Who do you think Santander is bringing back?

Somebody not making 16 million dollars to be oft-injured and basically replacement level.  Seems like we could do that on the waiver wire, and save 16 million dollars.

For the record, I'm not looking to trade Santader either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I always like it when Pickles gets uppity.  

Snell is fine.  This thread is exhausting.  

The threads good.  This should be our most interesting- not necessarily active- deadlines since Elias got here.

There's a million different ways to go, and that's why there are so many opinions.

But I am infinitely puzzled by the fetishization of Snell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Or, hear me out, we could trade Santander for somebody who is actually good, and isn't way over paid, and still call up Stowers.  Crazy, right?

I'd be down for trading Santander for someone better than Snell too.  But I just don't see that happening.  

Lyles FIP is 4.41 this year (career 4.69).  88 ERA+ in 2022 and 82 career.

Snell's FIP is 3.56 this year (3.56 career too).  86 ERA+ in 2022 and a 117 ERA+ career.  I suspect Snell will 'regress' to his career average.  Lyles' regression goes the other way.

Snell's health is a concern.  But is it more concerning than any other SP with quality movement to get key outs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, btdart20 said:

I'd be down for trading Santander for someone better than Snell too.  But I just don't see that happening.  

Lyles FIP is 4.41 this year (career 4.69).  88 ERA+ in 2022 and 82 career.

Snell's FIP is 3.56 this year (3.56 career too).  86 ERA+ in 2022 and a 117 ERA+ career.  I suspect Snell will 'regress' to his career average.  Lyles' regression goes the other way.

Snell's health is a concern.  But is it more concerning than any other SP with quality movement to get key outs?

If Snell had been in our organization, Tony would have written 15,000 words by now about how we should turn him into Arthur Rhodes.  And he'd probably be right.

He's had one season, otherwordly sure, where he's actually been good.  And yeah, a lot of that is availability.  Are we to believe he'll be healthier as he gets older and more injured continue to pile up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Your commitment to  making this team worse and more expensive is impressive.

Your commitment to being clueless is even more impressive.

The idea that you think Stowers plus Snell is worse than Santander is horrible.

Maybe you are also Wildcard and are obsessed with the recent sample size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
    • Dam the mosquito is in my Jelly. Please go away
    • Elias is refusing to spend money that Rubenstein has made available.  Do you have any sources?
    • Outside Hamilton, I can't really think of any areas or invidivuals outside the line that have really stepped up.  Humphrey and Stephens have played okay but it certainly hasn't offset the complete zeroes that Eddie Jackson and Marcus Williams have been.  I don't think you want to pull Hamilton off SS even though he can handle deep zone assignments fine, because he's essentially a linebacker that can cover wide receivers and there's too much value in that in the box.  And I think that Roquan/Simpson look lost in pass coverage because the safeties behind them are playing like butt.  Besides Roquan wasn't ever really a great coverage safety, he was kind of okay at it but he was never like a Lavonte David or Fred Warner there.   I'm starting to wonder if we need to either trade for a FS and/or start giving Ardarius Washington more snaps.  He certainly doesn't look worse than Jackson/Williams at this point in his limited playing time.  In general i think safety is an undervalued position so we're likely to get good value in trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...