Jump to content

Cade Povich 2022


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

Matt Sabados notes just now that Bowie has a 7-games-in-6-days series coming up next, that they may be in need of a pitcher.

The way he’s pitching tonite so far (4IP, all zeroes except for 7 Ks) maybe an out of the ordinary quick promotion?

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, baltfan said:

Not only did he give up only one hit and strike out 8 in 6 innings, he did it in 75 pitches. 

If O’s can unlock some extra velocity and develop one of his off speed offerings. Could be a pop-up prospect next year. Hopefully, he impresses enough for AA promotion after a few starts. 

Edited by Chaka Garcia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

I went and watched several of his starts last night as well as video of Johnson, McDermott and Cano. 

As usual, I'm going to be a little different from what I had read from some sources on these guys.

I'll be honest, I like Povich the best of the three and he has the best chance to stick as a starter.

Povich is a stringbean lefty with smooth mechanics that gets some swings and misses on his fastball (93-95 in 1st inning or so but settles in around 92-93 MPH), an advanced curveball with really good late bite. His slider is not very good but he can throw it as a get me over strike.

The changeup though is the separator for me. While the command needs to improve, the pitch has nice depth and some fade arm side and the only thing he needs to do is be told he has to throw it more instead of going to his bread and butter the curve. This is what makes him a better prospect for me than Drew Rom even though Rom is younger by a year and at a higher level. Rom refuses to use his changeup much despite the fact that he'll need it to have success at the major league level if he's going to stick as a starter.

Now, if he can improve that slider or use it more down and away he will be able to defend himself better against lefties, and his command can get inconsistent, but I can see why Elias likes the stuff.

 

 

This makes me feel a lot better about the Lopez trade, thanks for your analysis.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taking nothing from Povich tonight, but it looked to me as he benefitted somewhat from shadows over the first 3 innings when no opponent hit the ball out of the infield (6Ks, 63, 53, F2) and Wilmington went 9 up, 9 down.  For the game, he allowed just 3 balls out of the infield.  Great place to start.

Nice mix of called and swinging strikes in a game where he was exceptionally efficient in terms of total pitches and strike percentage.  Don't have the CF view, so high/low zone location is difficult to gauge.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Chaka Garcia said:

If O’s can unlock some extra velocity and develop one of his off speed offerings. Could be a pop-up prospect next year. Hopefully, he impresses enough for AA promotion after a few starts. 

Really doubt they're going to get more than what he's currently showing (93-95.)  What's more likely is that he gets the stamina to throw that hard in the 6th inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Chaka Garcia said:

If O’s can unlock some extra velocity and develop one of his off speed offerings. Could be a pop-up prospect next year. Hopefully, he impresses enough for AA promotion after a few starts. 

I think the point Elias was making is he was already a pop up prospect this year. I’m not saying he’s Grayson Rodriguez, but seems like a legit SP prospect right now.

1 hour ago, Hallas said:

Really doubt they're going to get more than what he's currently showing (93-95.)  What's more likely is that he gets the stamina to throw that hard in the 6th inning.

I agree with your point about holding velo, but I’d wager that comes with 1-2 more top end as well. Even that tick or two can be very helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LookinUp said:

I think the point Elias was making is he was already a pop up prospect this year. I’m not saying he’s Grayson Rodriguez, but seems like a legit SP prospect right now.

I agree with your point about holding velo, but I’d wager that comes with 1-2 more top end as well. Even that tick or two can be very helpful.

He's already gone from 88-90 to where he is now.  It feels like a stretch that he is going to get significantly more than that?  But I guess it's possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Melewski’s a little slow.  I saw that yesterday, elsewhere.
    • I wouldn’t trade Basallo or Mayo straight up for Crochet. We need a starter and Crochet may not be a starter the rest of the year and this work load could affect his arm next year as well. He’s just too much of a risk and may not help us win this year.  If we could use Kjerstad to headline a deal, I would think something could be worked out.  Personally, I doubt crochet is traded. Getz is going to overvalue him and teams aren’t going to part with a top 20 guy and a top 50 guy plus more.  It’s just not happening, as I said it wouldn’t for Cease. As for other pitchers, some of the Texas guys are certainly possible. Miami has some intriguing options potentially. I’m a Detmers guy, although he’s a bit of a project.(maybe big BP help this year) I am also more about improving the pen first. End of the day, do I want Fedde starting game 3 of a playoff series?  As of today, I’m not sure I do so I don’t want to trade assets for that guy.
    • Gibson is being promoted to Aberdeen, per Melewski.
    • Is O’Hearn that much worse than Mountcastle at 1B?  I don’t think so. 
    • I understand your case and logic for Skubal  . I do like him too . However I question whether the Tigers will trade him and secondly , is Elias willing pay the high costs to acquire him ?  Knowing Elias , I’m not sure 🤷‍♂️ 
    • But that’s my point, who are all these flawless options?  By no means do you have to trade for our guys, but it’s not a stellar group of starting pitchers.  You’ll likely take on some risk with whomever you acquire.  I don’t like taking specific comments and then generalizing the whole board, but there is quite a bit of nitpicking going on from a large group of posters on almost all the SP options not named Skubal as well as some overvaluing of your lesser prospects who are unlikely to get something of value.  Getting an impactful SP in this market is going to hurt one way or the other, you just have to decide what trade offs are you willing to take. I do appreciate your viewpoints because you seem capable of saying something might be fair in terms of value, but at the same time not be a trade you’d actually make.  Personally, I think Crochet would be a massive coup for you guys at the price I just mentioned, but I can respect if you feel he’s too risky.  I’m not sure there will another SP like him available in terms of potential impact and now is the time you guys should really be going for it.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...