Jump to content

Justin Verlander matchup 8/28/22


Pat Kelly

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Pat Kelly said:

Os playing with house money today.  Going into this weekend would have have been thrilled with 2 of 3 games.  The Voth Verlander matchup is the worst of the series.  

With the off day Monday I hope that Hyde fully rests Adley (no DH) let him get 2 days off. Also if the game as close late you can always have Adley PH for Chirinos.  

Play Nevin at 1B and and sit Mountcastle, he’s still not hitting and he’s not squaring up Verlander.   Santander needs to be in the lineup as does Hays, Mullins DH’d last night.   Start Stowers and Vavra.  This leaves Adley, Odor, Mountcastle and McKenna on the bench. 
 

 

With off day tomorrow 8-29-22, why do we need to rest players today 8-28-22 with Verlander pitching and wild card at stake?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NashLumber said:

Lineup. KtjYh7Q.png

Would ike to see Stowers starting more with Hays getting a day off, but I guess with his homer yesterday, they wanted to keep him in the lineup.  I have no problem with Odor over Vavra today, as Vavra has looked a bit lost lately after the absurd reaching base 10-11 times.  Overall, I'm okay with this. Let's see if we can pull a miracle and beat the AL Cy Young favorite. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hyde goes with the traditional lineup with Stowers, McKenna, Vavra and Nevin on the bench.  None of which will play or PH for any of the starters unless McKenna defensive/PR subs for Santander late. Chrinos defensive downgrade and automatic out.  Let’s hope MIddle of the order bat Mountcastle runs into a hit.  Could be a no hitter from Verlander today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, dtk9119 said:

Man I wish Stowers was in the line up.. and when is Mountcastle going to be dropped out of clean up spot?!?

Palmer was spot on (as usual) yesterday about Mountcastle's struggles.  He can't hit center cut 93 right down the middle.  I know he's a streaky hitter.  Let's hope he gets into one of those white hot stages in September, especially in the Toronto games, and we should have a good shot at the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like Verlander's splits this year show that he's dominating LH's more than RH (dominating both really).  I would have had Adley behind the plate and put more speed on the bases with another McKenna start and put Vavra at 2B to see if his contact approach is more effective. Would have gone

Mullins, Adley, Santander, Vavra, Urias, Hays, Mountcastle, Mateo, McKenna. Its probably going to be a low scoring game, so I feel like Mateo, McKenna, Mullins coming back around the line up might make things tricky for Verlander if one gets on.  If the O's can sneak out a run or two with small ball and Voth can get us 5IP with 2 or less runs, our BP can take it and we can try to strike Verlander late when offensives have hit him better, or get to Houston's less rested BP.  Love the O's, but not a fan of their line ups overall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

Palmer was spot on (as usual) yesterday about Mountcastle's struggles.  He can't hit center cut 93 right down the middle.  I know he's a streaky hitter.  Let's hope he gets into one of those white hot stages in September, especially in the Toronto games, and we should have a good shot at the playoffs. 

You can tell Mountcastle is being more cognizant of sliders and curves so it appears he is trying to wait longer for a  swing decision. In some respects it has paid off because he has taken some closer pitches and not just flailing away at pitches a foot outside. Issue now is he is getting beat by hard stuff.  Last season he destroyed any fastball inner 1/2 regardless of speed.
 

Maybe this is the classic sophomore slump. That to me is caused by overthinking after kind of winging it your first year. If this isn’t the case then unfortunately Mountcastle probably won’t end up being the player we had hoped.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, turtlebowl said:

You can tell Mountcastle is being more cognizant of sliders and curves so it appears he is trying to wait longer for a  swing decision. In some respects it has paid off because he has taken some closer pitches and not just flailing away at pitches a foot outside. Issue now is he is getting beat by hard stuff.  Last season he destroyed any fastball inner 1/2 regardless of speed.
 

Maybe this is the classic sophomore slump. That to me is caused by overthinking after kind of winging it your first year. If this isn’t the case then unfortunately Mountcastle probably won’t end up being the player we had hoped.  

Mountcastle's uppercut swing seems more pronounced than some of the other batters. Or at least I notice his more when he misses. I know it's against the grain of what's being taught now, but a slight uppercut (per Ted Williams' famous instruction booklet) seems more in tune with increasing the probability of contact than a big uppercut like some of the ones I'm seeing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pat Kelly said:

Hyde goes with the traditional lineup with Stowers, McKenna, Vavra and Nevin on the bench.  None of which will play or PH for any of the starters unless McKenna defensive/PR subs for Santander late. Chrinos defensive downgrade and automatic out.  Let’s hope MIddle of the order bat Mountcastle runs into a hit.  Could be a no hitter from Verlander today. 

Nope, two batters into the game, a reach-on-error that could have been scored a hit, and a hit.

Man I am so sick and tired of quitter fans who predict doom and gloom in every game, it's almost like it's a contest to be the first to say we are going to lose or get shut out or no-hit.    Guess it's just a personality trait I don't get.   Maybe it helps them enjoy the wins more.

We've been the best team in the AL East for the last 3 months but it seems like a good percentage of our fans still expect us to lose every game.   Obviously on the road vs the best team in the AL with their best pitcher on the mound, the odds are against us today, but I just don't get the need to declare doom before the game has even started or the first time we give up a hit or leave a guy on 3rd base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don’t either …. Kjerstad and Norby are too much. He a risky acquisition….I think you offer Norby or Stowers as your number 1 with a couple of others …maybe a 20-30 guy and a DSL player or two. 
    • Beavers by month: April: .886 May: .821 June: .599 Hopefully he turns it up in July. I feel like a lot of our position prospects find a way to turn it up at the end of the year. Let's see. 
    • You literally said I showed some skepticism over Basallo and that you pointed out his age and got "shouted down." Neither of which is true statement which is why I gave you the down vote (which I rarely do).  I would hope you would accurately depict what I wrote in the future vs using not just a "too harsh" of an adjective in "skepticism," but using the wrong word at all. If you are going to suggest I said something about a prospect, I just ask that your accurate depict what I said. Your original statement made it sound like I suddenly questioned Basallo after his slow start. I give out information on prospects and sometimes it's to point out their struggles. I pointed out how unbalanced Basallo was early i the season and how he did not look like that last year. That was a true statement. I did not follow that up with questioning him as a prospect or being skeptical of his prospect status. Oh, and BTW, I've given you upvotes of late as well. I don't hold grudges and typically give an upvote shortly after giving a down vote, which I only give when I'm misquoted or the post is against our rules significantly.   
    • Ok.  You don’t know what he’s asking for.  Even more so, you don’t know what he’d accept.     Will another team offer more than Kjerstad, Norby, and McDermott?    Can another team top that?    Doubtful.      Disclaimer:   I don’t think Elias would do this but I believe Crochet is gettable without giving up one of the top 3 prospects.
    • Sheesh. Once again, I do not mean any offense Tony, and this was in no way a personal shot at you. "Skepticism" was I guess not the best choice of noun here. My apologies. And I am not suggesting you weren't aware of his age or upside. Of course not. Nor am I trying to take any credit for pointing out his age. I never said that and I'm not sure how you're taking that from what I wrote.  Just a side note: I feel like I've been getting a lot of downvotes from you lately, and I even tried really hard to explain that I was in the wrong with the Basallo post I referenced, and was right to get a slap on the wrist. I'm not sure where I went wrong of late, but I hope I can get out of the doghouse at some point. I feel like my posts are being written one way and read another way that I'm not intending, so maybe I need to evaluate how I'm wording things. 
    • Thanks for the kudos, all! Last year, at A+, Basallo slugged .688 w/ an OPS of 1.131. At the age of 18.  That OPS put him 5th overall (minimum 50 PA). The names ahead of him (in parenthesis are prospect rankings for 2024): Xavier Isaac (#43 prospect overall) - 19 years old Aaron Palensky - 24 years old Jonathan Clase - 21 years old Agustin Ramirez - 21 years old That's it. Behind him were names like: Drew Gilbert (#39), Wyatt Langford (#6 before season started, 21 y/o), Junior Caminero (#2), Colson Montgomery (#9), Matt Shaw (#40), James Wood (#3), Jett Williams (#31)...I can keep going.  https://milbtracker.com/hitter-stats?levels[0]=A%2B&sort=ops&sort_direction=desc&org=&timeframe=2023&min_walk_percentage=0&max_strike_out_percentage=100&paginate=612
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...