Jump to content

The Lopez trade is costing the O's wins


Three Run Homer

Recommended Posts

What is our record when leading after 7? I think I saw somewhere (maybe one of the game threads) we only have one or two losses. No idea whether that was before or after Jorge.

It is true that Baker in a tie game was not a great look but Watkins put on the first baserunner. For the most part the bullpen has gotten the job done. I am actually much more confident in Bautista as closer, and I don't think he has blown any while Jorge has blown a couple for the Twins. So from that standpoint trading Jorge has actually gained us a couple of wins. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Natty said:

Maybe this is the problem...

Team batting .237/.305/.391/.696 

Or maybe there is no problem.  .696 is just a hair under league average .699.   And when you break it down by month:

April .604 (league average .669)

May .691 (.698)

June .722 (.719)

July .712 (.718) 

August .735 (.686)

Basically, we had a crappy April and have been decent since then.  I’m not saying we couldn’t be better, but the offense is decent.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Or maybe there is no problem.  .696 is just a hair under league average .699.   And when you break it down by month:

April .604 (league average .669)

May .691 (.698)

June .722 (.719)

July .712 (.718) 

August .735 (.686)

Basically, we had a crappy April and have been decent since then.  I’m not saying we couldn’t be better, but the offense is decent.

Ask the Yankee fans how they feel their offense has been.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

We are 16-9 during August.   13-0 when scoring 4+ runs, 3-9 when scoring 3 or less.   I’d say (1) the team is doing just fine, thank you, and (2) to the extent they’re losing sometimes, it’s because the offense is inconsistent.   Overall, they’ve played .640 baseball this month and that’s plenty good.   They’ve won their last three series.   Teams don’t win every game.  

100% this.  

It's been a great month.  It's been a FANTASTIC season, especially given what everyone's projections and predictions were coming in.  

I would pin some of the recent losses on the offense being inconsistent, too.  I liked Jorge Lopez as much as anyone else did but I think we sold high on him.  People are acting like we traded peak Mariano Rivera, I don't think that's the case at all.  

1 hour ago, Ohfan67 said:

 Winning seems to have unleashed a lot of angst in bird land. 

This, too.  Some of these fans are acting like Yankees/Sox fans with the way they're upset about taking 2/3 from a team like the Astros.  

I had no idea that trying to get the last wildcard spot was such a stressful ordeal.  People on here, people on twitter are losing their minds even though this team has won the last three series and haven't missed a beat since trading Mancini and Lopez.  

I've said it before, I'll say it again here.  If this team wins a World Series in 5 games, there are going to be people that are pissed that they didn't do it in 4.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're also in high leverage games night in/night out.  Eventually any pen is going to give up some runs.  Khriebel will be alright, he's just going through a rough patch.  Baker has great stuff, but just is really inconsistent.  We have the horses for the middle innings, they just need to produce.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/29/2022 at 9:46 AM, LA2 said:

What about what we received for Mancini thrilled you? Not disagreeing: just curious.

I think the talent and potential of the guys we received was excellent for a guy who was only under contract for two more months. 
 

Lopez was under contract for next season and we got 4 guys who probably won’t amount to anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, dystopia said:

I think the talent and potential of the guys we received was excellent for a guy who was only under contract for two more months. 
 

Lopez was under contract for next season and we got 4 guys who probably won’t amount to anything. 

Cade Povich disagrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dystopia said:

I think the talent and potential of the guys we received was excellent for a guy who was only under contract for two more months. 
 

Lopez was under contract for next season and we got 4 guys who probably won’t amount to anything. 

We got something that may turn into at the least a mlb player for a guy they picked up for nothing. 
Pretty sure the Os won that one since they picked Lopez off the garbage pile to begin with. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, dystopia said:

I think the talent and potential of the guys we received was excellent for a guy who was only under contract for two more months. 
 

Lopez was under contract for next season and we got 4 guys who probably won’t amount to anything. 

Until we bench Odor, I can’t say any trade is the reason we would miss the playoffs.

Povich looks like a #2-3 starter in the making.  Grayson (and hopefully Hall sticks) in 2023. Povich and Johnson in 2024.  I’ll take that as a pitching pipeline over what we’ve seen the past 5 years or so.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, sevastras said:

We got something that may turn into at the least a mlb player for a guy they picked up for nothing. 
Pretty sure the Os won that one since they picked Lopez off the garbage pile to begin with. 
 

Why does it matter how we got Lopez?  Why is picking him off the garbage heap and getting him for free any different than getting Adley Rutschman for free? 
 

It’s not how you acquire them, it’s how you develop them.  That’s what matters.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm kind of with you on this. Everything just feels like a crap shoot.  KC went and bought a bunch of 5th starters last offseason and might mess around and eliminate the top 2 AL East teams. 
    • With our second season of postseason futility behind us a number of posts have been made about the need for "players with postseason experience" to variously "calm, lead, guide, motivate," the younger players.  I've often suspected that this [postseason experience] is a much-overblown quality to guide our player acquisition efforts.  I realize the postseason, notably the World Series, is a mighty big stage on which to perform, but, between high school, college, and the minors, most of these players have played in some pretty big games under some significant pressure.   I finally ran across a data-driven article that set out to answer this question.  Published in 2002 in The Baseball Research Journal, Tom Hanrahan concludes it doesn't matter:   "Do baseball players fare better in the post-season when they have post-season experience behind them?  My research says the answer is a clear no.  Managers' efforts to build teams with players who 'have been there before' appear to be fruitless ventures, sacrificing money and possibly quality for no apparent gain.'"  What say you?  Is Hanrahan right?  Or is he all wet and the Orioles should go out and hire some wiley veterans who've "been there before" to get them over the hump?   https://sabr.org/journal/article/does-experience-help-in-the-postseason/#:~:text=Do baseball players fare better,quality for no apparent gain.
    • I disagree with your conclusion but I'm appropriating this line over the next couple of weeks:  "mega religious Lego playing softie white bread error machines."   🤣
    • What is crazy is that Soto won't be 26 for another couple of weeks.  Guy has been an absolute force on offense for 7 seasons already and he is almost a year younger than Adley.  There is always risk tied to the back end of big contracts, but I would hate to constantly pass on players like this just because we are always afraid of the next Chris Davis (who really fell off the cliff in his age 32 season).  I don't think we will be in play for a Soto type player anyhow, and I certainly understand that management has to focus on finances and the budgets. But as a fan, all I care about is winning games and October success. Whether the Os have a payroll of $50 million, $150 million, or $500 million, I really don't care as long as they bring a championship to Baltimore.  Flags fly forever.  
    • Is Britt the only good MLB journo at this point? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...