Jump to content

If you could get Jacob deGrom for 2/$90M; would you do it?


Jim'sKid26

Recommended Posts

Do the Orioles have a legit/decent probability shot at the World Series the next two years? Not really. This is the kind of signing you make when you already have a playoff caliber team. I’m hoping this is the kind of risk the Orioles can take in two years. They should sign a lower risk pitcher or two this offseason.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

Do the Orioles have a legit/decent probability shot at the World Series the next two years? Not really. This is the kind of signing you make when you already have a playoff caliber team. I’m hoping this is the kind of risk the Orioles can take in two years. They should sign a lower risk pitcher or two this offseason.   

Hopefully when the O's have a new deep pockets owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes.  It’s a big gamble but one they can afford to take and doesn’t hamstring them long term.   He is the best pitcher in baseball when healthy.   He ended the year healthy.  He’s shown he can go over 200 innings before and is still relatively young.  It’s doubtful you get two full healthy seasons from him but it’s possible and his impact would be the highest of any starter available.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Elias better be damn sure deGrom is healthy if you sign him to a contract because he's pitched 156 innings the last two seasons and he's going to be 35 years old in 2023.

I understand older pitchers can still be effective, but I'm thinking it's a pass. There's better risks who can stay healthy even if they lack deGrom's upside as a starting pitcher.  

deGrom could be healthy as an ox right now and there would still be a risk he’d get injured next year.  It’s the nature of pitching.  He probably has more risk than average, but they’re all risky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ohfan67 said:

Do the Orioles have a legit/decent probability shot at the World Series the next two years? Not really. This is the kind of signing you make when you already have a playoff caliber team. I’m hoping this is the kind of risk the Orioles can take in two years. They should sign a lower risk pitcher or two this offseason.   

They can absolutely win a title as soon as next year.  Things need to break a certain way but they can absolutely do it.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

They can absolutely win a title as soon as next year.  Things need to break a certain way but they can absolutely do it.

Agreed.   It would be foolish to write off the next two years as ones where the O’s couldn’t win a WS.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

Agreed.   It would be foolish to write off the next two years as ones where the O’s couldn’t win a WS.   

Ownership is the biggest hindrance in this possibility.  Will they spend? That’s the real question.

But if you believe in what Elias and his team are doing and you believe that he can recognize talent and develop it well, you have to believe they can win now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They can absolutely win a title as soon as next year.  Things need to break a certain way but they can absolutely do it.

Of course they CAN, but the team hasn’t made the playoffs yet and there could be substantial growing pains with young players next year. I want the Orioles to sign two very good pitchers, but I think a signing someone like DeGrom to an expensive two year contract doesn’t make much sense given where the team is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, seak05 said:

In a heartbeat, and right now the Orioles have payroll flexibility. I'd also be fine with signing Rodon, but that one has more financial risk long term. I would like to see them sign one of Rodon, Degrom or Senga this offseason

Senga  doesn’t seem like he belongs in the same sentence as Degrom or Rodon.

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...