Jump to content

40-Man Additions for Rule 5 Deadline


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Deadline to add players to the 40 Man Roster for protection from the Rule 5 draft is tomorrow, 6:00 pm. Hope it's OK to post in the Orioles board since the protected players will be on the 40 Man and are almost certain to see at least some time in the Majors. With all the free agents now declared the 40 Man is starting to come into view. 

The 40 Man Roster as it currently stands has six open spots: https://www.mlb.com/orioles/roster/40-man

Some players who could be DFA to make additional room: P Gillaspie, P Vallimont, OF Cameron, IF Tyler Nevin, C Kolozvary, P Krehbiel. That would be 7 additional spots, or potentially as many as 13. 

MLB Top 30 players almost certain to be protected: https://www.mlb.com/news/rule-5-draft-prospects-protected-on-40-man-rosters

Grayson  Rodriguez #4

Seth Johnson #10

Joey Ortiz #17

Drew Rom #19

 

Additional Rule 5 eligible prospects:

Noah Denoyer - Had a great year primarily at AA. Wasn't great in the AFL but made the Fall Stars team. Appears ready to start in AAA and pitch in MLB if he progresses. Great resume, we have room. Protect.

Maverick Handley - Excellent reputation for defense, has some pop in the bat through AA. Don't want to risk losing him. Protect

Shayne Fontana. Progressed from A+ to AAA in '22, highlighted by .898 OPS at Bowie. Had some injuries and didn't hit in a very small sample at Norfolk (played CF though). Could he be more valuable to keep around than Daz Cameron? Bubble

Ignacio Feliz - Could be another Felix Bautista clone (13 K/9) but 5+ BB/9 and hasn't hit AA yet. I think someone said he may be a minor league FA, so might be N/A. Bubble.

Kyle Brnovich. 11.1 K/9 vs 2.1 BB/9 in AA in '21. Had TJ in May '22.  Could be an interesting Tyler Wells type. Bubble

Easton Lucas. 4.76 ERA at Bowie but 10.3 K/9. Sent to AFL, perhaps for a last look and pitched decently with 11.5 K/9. Bubble.

Zach Peek - Advanced to AA. Decent ERA but K/9 dropped and then got shut down for TJ surgery. Some Tyler Wells risk. Don't Protect.

Cameron Bishop - Advanced to AA in 2021. Pitched 17 innings in AA and cup of AAA coffee last year before shut down in June (anyone know the nature of the injury?). Could be solid but probably not better than anyone in our current bullpen. I could maybe see keeping him over Gillaspie but it's close. Don't Protect.

Connor Gillispie - Repeated A+. Decent peripherals but nothing dominant. Again, close call vs Gillaspie. Hopefully there will be only one Gillaspie/Gillispie left standing if only to reduce confusion. Don't Protect

Robert Neustrom. Going into '22 some thought he had a good chance to make the O's after advancing to AAA and putting up combined 16 HR in '21. He hit 15 HR but only .231/.704 in '22. Some team may want to take a chance on his power but doesn't seem to fit with the O's. Don't Protect.  

Adam Hall and Cadyn Grenier. These guys were decent prospects at one time. Could perhaps be selected as utility guys but don't have a future with the Orioles with so many infielders ahead of them. Don't Protect

Garrett Stallings. Repeated AA. Mostly solid except for an absolutely disastrous stretch in June. Could have been tipping pitches or needed to figure something out. Still, a longshot to be selected. Don't Protect

I'm guessing we keep Denoyer and Handley. That would max out our six open spots.

Of the remaining guys, Feliz and Fontana may have the most upside. I'd be inclined to keep them and lose Cameron and a pitcher (although I'm not sure Feliz is eligible). We have a bunch of reliever types who you'd like to keep but could also be replaced by guys on the waiver wire. Any other predictions?

Great post.  I see 6 though.  Who is number 7?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks,  Good post.

I think Denoyer and Handley are protected.

I don't think Gillaspie and Krehbiel are in danger of being dropped at this point.

I think Elias will drop two of Vallimont, Cameron, or Nevin to leave room for Rule 5 pick(s).

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its fun to think about Luke today tomorrow - he has his three paragraphs ready for the Rule V draft preference list on like 40 guys (10 Rays, 10 Guardians, and 0.7 each for the other 27 Clubs) except these 48 hours he's on like a Slack chat with Sig, Eve, etc. trying to puzzle out why the Rays are asking for precisely so-and-so from the complex leagues.     Assuming he's still doing the gig here.

Go Orioles!

Is the 30 Club hive mind flat enough stuff like this deadline classic can't happen anymore?

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Other than Denoyer and Handley, the ones that interest me are Feliz, Brnovich and Peek.  Two of those are recovering from TJ so perhaps they aren’t a big risk to get taken.  Feliz misses a lot of bats, though he’s inconsistent.  

I think somebody on a long rehab like that might be more attractive as a Rule 5 pick, as they can on the DL instead of the active roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I think somebody on a long rehab like that might be more attractive as a Rule 5 pick, as they can on the DL instead of the active roster.

Brnovich's TJ was in May, Peek's was in August. Brnovich could actually pitch this year. Not sure if that works for or against his chances of being selected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Brnovich's TJ was in May, Peek's was in August. Brnovich could actually pitch this year. Not sure if that works for or against his chances of being selected.

More broadly, does anyone know the roster requirements for Rule V selections? I thought they had to be active for a certain number of days. I'm not sure how the new CBA affects that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Brnovich's TJ was in May, Peek's was in August. Brnovich could actually pitch this year. Not sure if that works for or against his chances of being selected.

You could send him to the MiLs for 40? 60? day rehab and end up only having them on the roster for like 6 weeks.  I think you would then be required to have him on the 25 for a certain number of days in 2024, but I could see some teams going that route.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Other than Denoyer and Handley, the ones that interest me are Feliz, Brnovich and Peek.  Two of those are recovering from TJ so perhaps they aren’t a big risk to get taken.  Feliz misses a lot of bats, though he’s inconsistent.  

The question is do you think any team would take them and keep them on the major league roster for a year?

RZNJ said he would eat his hat if Feliz was protected.  So I am rooting for Feliz even though I think RZ us normally right about these picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • No, not at all. Im saying guys who hammer the ball and show a lot of characteristics of good hitters are more prone to be good at hitting a baseball than players who don’t do those things. Yes he has a hole in his swing and if he never gets better, never develops and never learns anything, he is likely no more than a really good fielding, platoon guy with elite speed..which still makes him one of our 3 best OFers.
    • Looks like his 100 PA rolling xwOBA going back to the end of May has hovered between .330 and .360 for the most part, without ever falling below league average. That probably only covers his last 30 games though, which were better production wise at least than the 30 games before that.  
    • OMG, I just started a super similar poll/thread!! LOL!! It's now deleted.
    • I think Owen Murphy by himself would be a bit ambitious if he was healthy. Although FG has him as #10 in an admittedly bottom 1/3 system, he's still a 45 FV prospect and has a fairly large amount of helium. Just for reference that would put him in the same neighborhood as Beavers. Given that he just had TJS, he might be available at a discount, though If I'm the Braves I probably just wait rather than sell low. 
    • In order of preference to trade: Mayo Basallo Holliday Mayo is going to be a big time power hitter, but his defense just isn't where it needs to be. Maybe 1B eventually, but the Orioles just don't value 1B as a defensive position. They'd rather coach people up to it (see: Santander, Urias, etc.) or bring it outsiders (O'Hearn). Basallo I'm very high on. I have no idea about how his size and defense will play in the long run at C. His future might very well be a power hitting, LHH 1B/DH. But if C is in play, that is super powerful for this organization because you can rotate Adley and Basallo at C, and play Basallo at 1B when he's not catching. Holliday is special, SSS in the majors be damned. His ceiling is SS, but that is going to be at odds w/ Gunnar, so 2B it is. But the speed is there. I can easily see Holliday being a 20/20 or a 30/30 guy year in and year out w/ an exceptional eye/patience. That is incredibly valuable. And he's only 20.  There isn't a sizable gap between Holliday and Basallo for me on how special they both are, just so we're clear.
    • How do you think the unthinkable?               Mike Tyson:  With an ithberg.
    • Definitely would be willing to trade a lot more for Skubal considering he would have 2 additional years team control after this season if I were the Os. He would slot into Burns role next year as the TOR with Grayson after him 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...