Jump to content

“Orioles big game shopping & most believe it's exclusively rotation”


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

Just now, Es4M11 said:

Not sure I would want Crawford over Mateo at this point. I know Crawford is only a year removed from a stellar 2021, but he is 36, going on 37. And Mateo was straight up better in 2022. And significantly cheaper, with future control remaining. I doubt Crawford's potential availability would hinder Mateo's market. The Giants aren't trading Crawford anyway, they will let him retire a Giant.

Crawford is 35, going on 36. My mistake, can't edit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, clapdiddy said:

Is there any chance the Orioles could be in on one or both of the Japanese League players?  I realize there's a posting fee for these guys, and I'm not even sure if any team is showing interest. 

Senga is said to want to go to a big market. I'm guessing he ends up in LA.  I don't know anything about the other guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

Is there any chance the Orioles could be in on one or both of the Japanese League players?  I realize there's a posting fee for these guys, and I'm not even sure if any team is showing interest. 

No posting fee for Senga. Supposedly he wants a big market so he may not be in on us even if we are in on him. https://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/baseball/news/kodai-senga-available-without-posting-fee/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Es4M11 said:

Senga is said to want to go to a big market. I'm guessing he ends up in LA.  I don't know anything about the other guy.

I would imagine most Japanese players would prefer to go to a big market. It's not like Baltimore is exactly romanticized in film, tv, etc. I'd say smaller market teams in particular are at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to signing established foreign players and it's only partly due to money/finances. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bemorewins said:

Almost all significant free agent contracts in MLB are bad at the end. It is the cost of doing business. The teams that spend will be relevant, generate national buzz, and contend for pennants for the most part. Those who don't will have "good budgets" with plenty of profits for their ownership groups... and also probably no rings.

If you've been to NY lately or a Yanks game (or heck an O's game vs the Yankees in Camden), then you would know why the Yankees couldn't afford to let him go. All these people wearing 99 jerseys, that matters. They don't have another singular marketable force like him. (To be fair theere are very few in the game right now.)

Older fans/people may be more loyal to institutions/teams on average. But younger ones not so much (and I have 3 kids from teen years to early elementary school) so I hear often how they talk with their peers.) One of my kids tried to become a Blue Jays fan because she likes Vlad Jr and she loved her experience at the Rodgers center when we went to Toronto this Summer. Of course, I had to "reeducate" her...lol

But the reality is younger people are not simply going to cheer laundry, like us "older folk". The Ravens will find this out if they let Lamar Jackson leave.

Good post, completely agree.  There are bad contracts and then there are good contracts that overpay at the end.  This is the latter.  The Yankees are paying for the next 5 years, anything they get in years 6-9 are gravy.  And if Judge continues to have them in the playoffs for the next 5 years then it will be completely worth it.

If you want to bring in a sure-fire guy you have to overpay.  If you want to keep payroll flexibility you have to dig in the bargain bin and hope for the best.  The truly bad contracts are the Chris Davis ones, where the guy is not necessarily surefire.  That was a big mistake giving him the money and not Machado.

I'd have given the same contract that Verlander got.  I hope we overpay for Rodon.  I'm betting we will end up with another mid-level SP or make a trade of prospects for an established guy.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ABSOLUTELY AGREE with everything you said down to the punctuation marks! LOL

If we were to pay both Rodon and Correa that would add somewhere around 60 million to what we have and the payroll would still be very manageable going forward.

Yes, they will be some "not so productive years at the back end". But we wouldn't need to really do a bunch of roster additions via free agency for the next few years.

Another thing to consider to the people who are advocating for the club to continue to not participate in big free agents because of price and/or length of contract - At some point if Henderson and Rutschman become stars they are going to want similar type deals that have padded back ends for themselves. Either we lock them up now (like Seattle did JRod) or we pay them the same type of "bad contracts" that people are complaining about later. This is the business of baseball (right now) and it is what cost to have the better players.

I look at it like this, since we have deciding not to participate in Free Agency for the last 4 years, at some point the club has to invest in the onfield product and the money should be there for them to do so right now. When will going cheap not be okay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

Seems like a lot for Jansen, especially considering the Red Sox probably won't have that many wins for him to close out this year. I mean, who exactly is in their rotation?

The Sox have to add a starter or two, right? They have Sale (if healthy), Paxton (if healthy) and then Pivetta, Bello, and Whitlock. If everyone is healthy and at their best, it's not a bad rotation, but there is no way anyone can have any confidence in Sale or Paxton being healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

Seems like a lot for Jansen, especially considering the Red Sox probably won't have that many wins for him to close out this year. I mean, who exactly is in their rotation?

It seems like a terrible panicky desperation move by a division rival to just sign someone for the sake of signing someone since they missed out on every other major FA. I love it!  Kenley Jansen is absolute toast and will pitch himself out of the closer role by early June. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, HakunaSakata said:

I would imagine most Japanese players would prefer to go to a big market. It's not like Baltimore is exactly romanticized in film, tv, etc. I'd say smaller market teams in particular are at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to signing established foreign players and it's only partly due to money/finances. 

Most people know Baltimore from The Wire or the Freddie Grey riots. I know they say there's no such thing as bad publicity, but man...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • All of what you posted is why you have to take both dWAR and fWAR with a grain of salt when it comes to valuing defense.  OAA strictly gives you how good a player is at his position vs other players at his position. There is no guessing involved. Now could OAA receive some tweaking, especially with infielders, I think so. I don't think OAA is perfect by any means, but let's say Santana did save his team 12 runs and let's say a SS was at 0 runs saved. Why should he be penalized for playing a less stressful position? In the end he did save runs vs a SS that didn't save or lose runs. I guess in the end you look at all the defensive metrics (OAA, dWAR, DRS) and then make your opinion based off them. I also use my scouting eye and watching most of the games, I'd say Cowser is an above average defensive outfielder with plus arm strength and way below average accuracy.
    • Burnes and Eflin were fantastic keeping the team moving forward in a year Felix, Bradish and Grayson were mostly gone. It is fuzzy for me if you combine Elias' team's results in the cases of Albert Suarez and Trevor Rogers if that's a good job or a bad job. Some talk about people like Pivetta, but I don't see a ton of April/May/June demand.     Eflin, Grayson, Kremer, Povich and Suarez leave Rogers, McDermott and Young 6/7/8 already.    Are those guys ever going to pitch? Povich and Suarez showed enough in September it seems worth it to see April. We rarely see a decision Elias doesn't like to defer, and the first half of 2025 will give information how the roster needs to be managed.    How strong is Felix?    What setbacks do Bradish and Wells have?    Can Grayson hold up more than 2 straight months? Elias is building a body of work he'll win the bids for Corbin Burnes and Zach Eflin when necessary, but I don't think this winter is one of those times.
    • OAA and dWAR are two measure that people use to determine if a player is a good defensive player or not. They absolutely can be mentioned when talking defense. They both measure the defensive ability of a player, though they do it differently. Acting like it some kind of horror to mention them together is one of the more ridiculous stances I've ever seen you take here.  NOBODY said they measure the exact same thing and the EXACT same way, but they absolutely are two measures people use to determine if a player is good defensively.  OAA shows Cowser to be a well above average defensive outfielder while dWAR shows Cowser to be more average. I think OAA in this case absolutely is a better indicator of Cowser's defensive ability. 
    • Cowser has not exactly been great down the stretch this year. That WPA is from his unclutchness.  Saying that, Gil has not exactly been a world beater his last two months of the season either. Gil also gets the New York bonus from some in the media so I still think he'll get the nod. But maybe Cowser can pull it off despite the K's and unclutchness.  
    • 1. It's not too hard to cherry pick guys who had success in hindsight. The problem is picking those guys in advance. Not sure what your point is here. Yes, it would suck losing to a pitcher like Lugo but maybe Danny Coulombe gets some big outs or Ramon Urias is the series MVP.  2. Last year we choked. Hope it's different this year. Also let's not forget the opponent matters. Sometimes you run into a buzzsaw, it happens.  3. We have all the pieces necessary to win a championship but there are 11 other teams and it's hard to win the WS. Yes, we have weaknesses. If I had to guess, we will beat KC but fall short of the championship. Whatever happens, go O's.   
    • Can't see them sitting Cowser. He hasn't sat much against lefties all year.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...