Jump to content

“Orioles big game shopping & most believe it's exclusively rotation”


Roll Tide

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

OK, I think I remember seeing it but I wasn't sure.  Of course MOO technically means 4-6 and not as if a guy hitting 6th is a huge offensive threat for most teams.

A friendly challenge for anyone to find a quote like that.   He did say a #1-#3 starter but that's kind of subjective too.    Hopefully, he'll pull a rabit out his hat and come up with Rodon.   The funny thing is, some people on here wouldn't be happy with a Rodon signing!

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Elias quote re: long-term pitching deals.

Reading between the lines, this would seem to indicate he believes that in 2024 the team will be even better, therefore it makes better sense to him to take advantage of the "best year" of a pitching contract at that time rather than now. I have no doubt this quote will be eaten alive here. I take his word for it on the first year typically being the best - I assume they've got the data to back that up. Not sure I agree with the reasoning, but it checks out with his other comments about "building the business" and doing this in a step-by-step manner over a series of off-seasons based on his view of this core continuing to improve over the next 2 years or so. 

This indicates to me Rodon is absolutely out, as well as Bassitt. 

 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, interloper said:

New Elias quote re: long-term pitching deals.

Reading between the lines, this would seem to indicate he believes that in 2024 the team will be even better, therefore it makes better sense to him to take advantage of the "best year" of a pitching contract at that time rather than now. I have no doubt this quote will be eaten alive here. I take his word for it on the first year typically being the best - I assume they've got the data to back that up. Not sure I agree with the reasoning, but it checks out with his other comments about "building the business" and doing this in a step-by-step manner over a series of off-seasons based on his view of this core continuing to improve over the next 2 years or so. 

This indicates to me Rodon is absolutely out, as well as Bassitt. 

 

Ugh new excuses every year. Pitching gets more expensive every year too. We could’ve signed Stroman last year to what would be a reasonable deal this year. Next year they’re gonna be surprised that pitching costs so much. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Ok.  If it was so clear, maybe you can tell us what that plan was?

I suspect Elias was going to do what he said and add a good SP and 2 bats. A salary of $100 million would still be in the top of bottom third. 
 

Let’s say you added Tallion $17 per, Benintendi $17 per , and Correa $30 per. That 64 million ….you could trade Santander 7.5 million, Hays 2.5 million. That would leave your payroll in the 90s. You then still have the luxury to trade some pieces. 
 

Remember $30 million of what you get this year is a payout from the Disney deal. So even if you highball and say 100 million the net is only $70 million which is a high $20 million ish difference.

Save the $10 million you gave Gibson ….do a deal for Lopez. Maybe even deal some players/prospects for Reynolds. And deal Mullins.
 

You’ve repaired the OBP issue substantially and upgraded the rotation. We have a much better chance IMO.

Edited by Roll Tide
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, interloper said:

New Elias quote re: long-term pitching deals.

Reading between the lines, this would seem to indicate he believes that in 2024 the team will be even better, therefore it makes better sense to him to take advantage of the "best year" of a pitching contract at that time rather than now. I have no doubt this quote will be eaten alive here. I take his word for it on the first year typically being the best - I assume they've got the data to back that up. Not sure I agree with the reasoning, but it checks out with his other comments about "building the business" and doing this in a step-by-step manner over a series of off-seasons based on his view of this core continuing to improve over the next 2 years or so. 

This indicates to me Rodon is absolutely out, as well as Bassitt. 

 

The thing is, a guy you get this offseason, his year two might be better than the year one of a guy you can get next year.

Now I haven't looked into who might be out there next year and I'm sure Mike has but you can't just assume the perfect fit is going to be there for you.

 

I'm also not sure at all that he's right about the year one thing for free agent pitchers.  I've never seen anyone doing any analysis on the topic but I think pitching is more random than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Sounds a little like paralysis by analysis there!

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

The thing is, a guy you get this offseason, his year two might be better than the year one of a guy you can get next year.

Now I haven't looked into who might be out there next year and I'm sure Mike has but you can't just assume the perfect fit is going to be there for you.

 

I'm also not sure at all that he's right about the year one thing for free agent pitchers.  I've never seen anyone doing any analysis on the topic but I think pitching is more random than that.

Yeah this level of risk aversion comes off a little extreme. On the one hand, he's confirmed to have talked to Boras clients and put in multi-year offers to pitchers. On the other hand, we have quotes like this that point to an extreme level of caution. He did say their approach is careful and deliberate. 

It seems like he really wants to confirm that, yes, this core of players is for real and improving before he makes sizeable moves. Maybe he's got his eye on the deadline more than this offseason, I don't know. 

It's hard to reconcile their apparent aggressiveness at the Winter Meetings with quotes like this. Based on the info we have, I'd expect a Syndergaard or similar type pitcher on a 1-2 year deal. And if the team is cooking come July, maybe we pull the trigger on a big trade. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Connolly did the correction interview right? So this one I assume is questioning the correction. I think John Angelos pulled back the budget on Elias. To not throw the Angelos family under the bus he covered for them with the I was misunderstood thing. Since Elias is pretty clear about the plan before that I think it’s fair to assume that is what happened. 

I don’t.  But I’m not into making assumptions.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

I suspect Elias was going to do what he said and add a good SP and 2 bats. A salary of $100 million would still be in the top of bottom third. 
 

Let’s say you added Tallion $17 per, Benintendi $17 per , and Correa $30 per. That 64 million …. trade Santanderyou 7could .5 million, Hays 2.5 million. That would leave your payroll in the 90s. You then still have the luxury to trade some pieces. 

Remember $30 million of what you get this year is a payout from the Disney deal. So even if you highball and say 100 million the net is only $70 million which is a high $20 million ish difference.

Save the $10 million you gave Gibson ….do a deal for Lopez. Maybe even deal some players/prospects for Reynolds. And deal Mullins.
 

You’ve repaired the OBP issue substantially and upgraded the rotation. We have a much better chance IMO.

You said it was clear.  But even your plan which is the plan you suspect he had that was so clear didn't really add 2 bats.   You added Benintendi and Correa and subtracted Santander and Hays.    That's a net gain of ZERO.    That is/was YOUR plan.

Elias said a pitcher and two bats.   He never got specific about what type of bats and what type of pitcher until fairly recently when he said a #1-#3 pitcher, and a bat that would be on the level of Hays/Santander/Mullins.   Benintendi would certainly qualify as that type of bat.  But Elias is only talking about adding, not subtracting.

Bottom line.  You are suspecting, speculating, guessing at what he meant when he said one pitcher and two bats.   It's not so much what he said but what you wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

New Elias quote re: long-term pitching deals.

Reading between the lines, this would seem to indicate he believes that in 2024 the team will be even better, therefore it makes better sense to him to take advantage of the "best year" of a pitching contract at that time rather than now. I have no doubt this quote will be eaten alive here. I take his word for it on the first year typically being the best - I assume they've got the data to back that up. Not sure I agree with the reasoning, but it checks out with his other comments about "building the business" and doing this in a step-by-step manner over a series of off-seasons based on his view of this core continuing to improve over the next 2 years or so. 

This indicates to me Rodon is absolutely out, as well as Bassitt. 

 

Someone needs to get him away from microphones at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

New Elias quote re: long-term pitching deals.

Reading between the lines, this would seem to indicate he believes that in 2024 the team will be even better, therefore it makes better sense to him to take advantage of the "best year" of a pitching contract at that time rather than now. I have no doubt this quote will be eaten alive here. I take his word for it on the first year typically being the best - I assume they've got the data to back that up. Not sure I agree with the reasoning, but it checks out with his other comments about "building the business" and doing this in a step-by-step manner over a series of off-seasons based on his view of this core continuing to improve over the next 2 years or so. 

This indicates to me Rodon is absolutely out, as well as Bassitt. 

 

Holy crap, these excuses are getting wild  🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'd love to see the actual numbers on if year 1 is more valuable but that's a lot more work than I'm willing to put in.

Not sure about the rest of the league but the last few the O's gave out have not worked out that way.

Wei-Yin Chen's best 2 seasons were his 3rd and 4th season
Ubaldo's best was his 2nd season
Cobb's best season over his contract was his 4th season (with the Angels). Statistically his 3rd year was his best in Baltimore but it was only over 52.1 innings. His first was the only time he threw a full season and even that was only 152.1.

Small sample obviously but it doesn't ring true in terms of long term free agent pitching deals given out by the O's.


 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

You said it was clear.  But even your plan which is the plan you suspect he had that was so clear didn't really add 2 bats.   You added Benintendi and Correa and subtracted Santander and Hays.    That's a net gain of ZERO.    That is/was YOUR plan.

Elias said a pitcher and two bats.   He never got specific about what type of bats and what type of pitcher until fairly recently when he said a #1-#3 pitcher, and a bat that would be on the level of Hays/Santander/Mullins.   Benintendi would certainly qualify as that type of bat.  But Elias is only talking about adding, not subtracting.

Bottom line.  You are suspecting, speculating, guessing at what he meant when he said one pitcher and two bats.   It's not so much what he said but what you wanted.

Net zero gain ….LMAO! 
 

Switching those 2 for 2 …..there is a net of 115 points of OBP and 4.2 WAR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Sheesh. Once again, I do not mean any offense Tony, and this was in no way a personal shot at you. "Skepticism" was apparently too harsh of an adjective here. My apologies. And I am not suggesting you weren't aware of his age or upside. Of course not. Nor am I trying to take any credit for pointing out his age. I never said that and I'm not sure how you're taking that from what I wrote.  Just a side note: I feel like I've been getting a lot of downvotes from you lately, and I even tried really hard to explain that I was in the wrong with the Basallo post I referenced, and was right to get a slap on the wrist. I'm not sure where I went wrong of late, but I hope I can get out of the doghouse at some point. I feel like my posts are being written one way and read another way that I'm not intending, so maybe I need to evaluate how I'm wording things. 
    • Thanks for the kudos, all! Last year, at A+, Basallo slugged .688 w/ an OPS of 1.131. At the age of 18.  That OPS put him 5th overall (minimum 50 PA). The names ahead of him (in parenthesis are prospect rankings for 2024): Xavier Isaac (#43 prospect overall) - 19 years old Aaron Palensky - 24 years old Jonathan Clase - 21 years old Agustin Ramirez - 21 years old That's it. Behind him were names like: Drew Gilbert (#39), Wyatt Langford (#6 before season started, 21 y/o), Junior Caminero (#2), Colson Montgomery (#9), Matt Shaw (#40), James Wood (#3), Jett Williams (#31)...I can keep going.  https://milbtracker.com/hitter-stats?levels[0]=A%2B&sort=ops&sort_direction=desc&org=&timeframe=2023&min_walk_percentage=0&max_strike_out_percentage=100&paginate=612
    • I'll be honest, he's surprised me a bit with his defense and speed this year. His spring speed is 67th percentile and better yet, he's looked pretty decent, if not a little awkward, even while playing giant left field in Camden yards. Now, saying that, his reaction times have been quite poor (-2.9 ft/sec) and his burst is not great (-1.1 ft) but his routes have been pretty good and he's still getting used to MLB stadiums with upper decks. Heck, he even maxed at a 96.1 MH throw which is more arm strength then I've seen before.  So I have to give him some credit for doing some things this offseason to better his defensive abilities. Even Colton Cowser, who is is 9 OAA this year in the outfield and covers 34.8 ft/sec (1.3 ft better than average) was 1-.2 last year so sometimes it takes a bit.  Is Kjerstad better suited for RF than LF in Camden Yards, sure, but his defense has actually been ok out there. He's playable and should get better.  
    • Not interested in any of those guys. Tallion is no better than Irvin or Suarez
    • Kremer hasn't been very good at Norfolk. How much longer can he stay there? Maybe we make two trips through the rotation until the All Star break. I also wonder if Burnes makes the AL squad, and he almost certainly will, does that mean he has to skip that last Sunday start?
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...