Jump to content

Are the Orioles a legitimate playoff contender (Going into Spring training)?


Tony-OH

Are the Orioles a legitimate playoff contender?  

114 members have voted

  1. 1. Are the Orioles a legitimate playoff contender?

    • Yes - they will be in the playoff hunt in September
    • No - No they will be out of the playoff hunt by September


Recommended Posts

The O's won in 2022 with a mix of youngsters and veterans.  Then they let the veterans go at the end of the season.   

Elias thought he would make a splash with some FA but then was told there was not that kind of money. 

So he filled the holes with slightly better veterans.  Players that he hopes to trade for youth as his high ranked prospects take over during the season.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, wildcard said:

The O's won in 2022 with a mix of youngsters and veterans.  Then they let the veterans go at the end of the season.   

Elias thought he would make a splash with some FA but then was told there was not that kind of money. 

So he filled the holes with slightly better veterans.  Players that he hopes to trade for youth as his high ranked prospects take over during the season.

Possibly.   It would be tough to flip guys who performing well at the deadline if the O’s are in contention but that’s exactly what he did in 2022.    It would pretty ballsy to do it again, not that I’m against it.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted no, although I do feel very good about where this organization is.  My rationale:

  • The off-season “upgrades” were around the edges and may/may not be better than last year.  McCann almost certainly is, but that’s a backup catcher.  While I like Givens he is unlikely to be an upgrade over what Lopez provided last year.
  • I think it’s highly unlikely that the bullpen can repeat last year’s performance.
  • I’m hopeful but not counting on getting more from Adley this year.  If he stays healthy we could, but I also worry about him wearing down given how much the O’s rely on him.
  • I just don’t see the rotation and Gunnar making up for the expected regressions.  
  • Other contenders made bigger upgrades.

All that said, I’m really looking forward to seeing Henderson, Rodriguez, and, eventually, Cowser, Norby, Westberg, and Ortiz, begin to establish themselves at the major league level.


 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • The point wasn’t who was better between Irvin or Grayson, it was that if there is even a discussion, Grayson can’t be considered part of a “Big 3”.  After his performance in the playoffs last year and his lack of command so far this season, he needs to show a decent amount of improvement to be looked at that way.
    • https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/grayson-rodriguez-680570?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb https://baseballsavant.mlb.com/savant-player/cole-irvin-608344?stats=statcast-r-pitching-mlb Grayson has a higher ceiling than Cole, I think almost anyone would argue, yes.  But even if we're strictly looking at numbers, despite Grayson's uneven start, he is still statistically better than Cole in a handful of areas (mainly whiff rate, K rate, xBA, xERA).
    • Given his success here and perhaps lack of strong interest elsewhere, I wouldn't be surprised if Lopez would be OK with a minor league deal here.
    • Lots of stats say Irvin hasn’t been better this year. Grayson has had a few rough starts around his injury…he’s been excellent otherwise and has been excellent since he got re-called last year. Irvin is pitching very well but he’s not a sub 3 ERA guy.  He may be a sub 4 ERA guy though. 
    • One factor to consider in taking HS talent is age.  Historically, prep players that are 19'ish work out less often than their younger counterparts.  The main reason is that they are physically more mature, and thus have an advantage.  There have been exceptions certainly, but often they have weaker careers.   Sig is well aware of the analytics, so it would be a bit surprising to see us go that route. In 2019, we took Gunnar 26 days before his 18th birthday, and Holliday was 18.6 years old when we took him in 2022.  It's a factor... but I can't say with certainty we wouldn't draft a 19-year old that early.
    • I don't have a horse in that race, but I question your logic. Seems like you're saying: Stuff > Results. Or maybe, so far this year Irvin is better, but long term you're betting on Grayson?
    • I hadn't read that, but it seems we are thinking similar things. 😃  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...