Jump to content

What the new Oriole scoreboard looks like


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

  • Going Underground changed the title to What the new Oriole scoreboard looks like
19 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Gambling culture is so tacky.  

I just worry that problem gambling is going to skyrocket.   And yeah, I think we can expect more gambling scandals involving players.   

My big reasons for not gambling:

1.  The odds are rigged to favor the house, so if you do it a lot, you’re almost sure to lose.  

2.  I’m fully aware that I’m not objective.  

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I just worry that problem gambling is going to skyrocket.   And yeah, I think we can expect more gambling scandals involving players.   

My big reasons for not gambling:

1.  The odds are rigged to favor the house, so if you do it a lot, you’re almost sure to lose.  

2.  I’m fully aware that I’m not objective.  

 

I expect we are going to start seeing societal consequences to the boom and normalization of gambling in the near future.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I just worry that problem gambling is going to skyrocket.   And yeah, I think we can expect more gambling scandals involving players.   

My big reasons for not gambling:

1.  The odds are rigged to favor the house, so if you do it a lot, you’re almost sure to lose.  

2.  I’m fully aware that I’m not objective.  

 

I don't think there will be many gambling scandals, if any, involving players.  The Black Sox were underpaid in an era where a lot of ballplayers worked regular jobs in the offseason.  And they hated Comiskey.  Pete Rose was a degenerate gambler, he was an outlier.

Ballplayers today make too much and there's too much on the line for any of them to be as stupid as Rose to bet on their own sport...or their own teams.  I don't care if any of them gamble on other sports or whatever else they do in their spare time.

I just think most gambling culture is tacky, all the ****ing Fanduel ads, all of the gambling house ads are just so smarmy.  Like a step or two above a strip club taxi cab topper in NYC.  While I like a good strip club, I also don't want to see Hustler's logo or a Ritz Cabaret sign on an outfield fence.  They're all too similar for me.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

I don't think there will be many gambling scandals, if any, involving players.  The Black Sox were underpaid in an era where a lot of ballplayers worked regular jobs in the offseason.  And they hated Comiskey.  Pete Rose was a degenerate gambler, he was an outlier.

Ballplayers today make too much and there's too much on the line for any of them to be as stupid as Rose to bet on their own sport...or their own teams.  I don't care if any of them gamble on other sports or whatever else they do in their spare time.

I just think most gambling culture is tacky, all the ****ing Fanduel ads, all of the gambling house ads are just so smarmy.  Like a step or two above a strip club taxi cab topper in NYC.  While I like a good strip club, I also don't want to see Hustler's logo or a Ritz Cabaret sign on an outfield fence.  They're all too similar for me.

 

It's cool.  They will just have Trout play professional basketball for a season.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I expect we are going to start seeing societal consequences to the boom and normalization of gambling in the near future.

 

As one who works with young adults, I can tell you the consequences are already here.  We have 20 year old who can't read a novel (or read cursive for that matter) or do algebra, but they spend hours analyzing minute pick-em NBA prop bets.

Their brains are being wired to gamble.  Gambling is addictive and the people pushing this- politicians, "business" interests- know that damn well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pickles said:

As one who works with young adults, I can tell you the consequences are already here.  We have 20 year old who can't read a novel (or read cursive for that matter) or do algebra, but they spend hours analyzing minute pick-em NBA prop bets.

Their brains are being wired to gamble.  Gambling is addictive and the people pushing this- politicians, "business" interests- know that damn well.

I'm just here to say that algebra is overrated and not an essential life skill.

Signed,

An English Major.

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I'm just here to say that algebra is overrated and not an essential life skill.

Signed,

An English Major.

 I understand what you're saying but somebody is going to have to build the bridges and maintain the infastructure.  

But I am much more concerned with their mental and spiritual well-being.  Social media, instant and ubiquitous pornography, surrounded by cultural rot and decay, and now gambling being pushed into every corner of society......

I hate to break it to ya'll, but this don't end well.

Edited by Pickles
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...