Jump to content

Very, very way too early thoughts


eddie83

Recommended Posts

- love the pace of play. Wish this had been implemented years ago. Much better product. 
- not going to get all worked up on pitching and defense. Self explanatory. I will say I wonder if they handle someone like Hall differently down the road if pen woes continue. Let’s get until around Memorial Day before we revisit.  
-curious to see if defense picks it up in Texas. Can’t blame weather there 

-bats looked good. I like the age of our hitters. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bullpen is really worrying me.  That saved the O's so many times last year.  Offense looks like it will be better this year, but if the pitching doesn't turn around it won't matter. 

Tampa Bay off to 3-0 start.  Springs threw 6 scoreless today.  Franco hitting .636 so far.  SSS alert!  If Franco breaks out and their starting pitching is as good as it looks, they will be tough to beat for the division. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly this was such a trash first weekend of the season.  The pitching sucked at basically every level of the major league team, the defense was terrible, and we lost 2-3 to a terrible Boston team.  Not to mention John Angelos sign posting that Adley is gone in a few years.

The Orioles did a great freaking job killing any enthusiasm I had for the season.

And that's one for the overreaction thread.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't think they were a playoff team to begin with but that still doesn't change the fact that I thought the pitching would have been a little better.

 

The most concerning thing for me is the fact that ownership has pretty much broadcasted that there's not any money for extensions. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like our offense so far but that's where it ends. Way too early to tell much of anything.

We lost this series because of some shoddy defense and poor pitching. We pretty much went toe to toe on offense. I'm anxious to see how we do/rebound in Texas. Texas hit the snot out of the ball over their first two games against the Phillies. Then in come The Sanks. Who said this early schedule was easy?

Wonder what if any roster moves we make going into Texas. At the rate we are going, we won't have a bull pen by Wednesday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Insert tongue in cheek…

 

Well guys. We gave it a good run. Knew when Frazier got 8 mil we were not really going to compete. It’s a sign this front office is the most inept in baseball history. Buncha fan boys. 

Edited by foxfield
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

I didn't think they were a playoff team to begin with but that still doesn't change the fact that I thought the pitching would have been a little better.

 

The most concerning thing for me is the fact that ownership has pretty much broadcasted that there's not any money for extensions. 

Can anyone find the quote for this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, joelala said:

Can anyone find the quote for this? 

 

It wasn't a definitive statement or anything, but it's not a good look when you're asked about an extension for your best player and you immediately start talking about the limitations of the "system."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moshagge3 said:

 

It wasn't a definitive statement or anything, but it's not a good look when you're asked about an extension for your best player and you immediately start talking about the limitations of the "system."

The same system that has the Guardians, Rays and Pirates extending players...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moshagge3 said:

 

It wasn't a definitive statement or anything, but it's not a good look when you're asked about an extension for your best player and you immediately start talking about the limitations of the "system."

Extremely tempting to just stop financially supporting the team. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moshagge3 said:

 

It wasn't a definitive statement or anything, but it's not a good look when you're asked about an extension for your best player and you immediately start talking about the limitations of the "system."

At this point Angelos could have said something like it is exciting to have such a talented, young player playing for the O's and we will be looking to extend him (even if he is thinking there isn't money).  It's a bad look to be crying poor when there was $65 million in profits (or somewhere in that range) last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

At this point Angelos could have said something like it is exciting to have such a talented, young player playing for the O's and we will be looking to extend him (even if he is thinking there isn't money).  It's a bad look to be crying poor when there was $65 million in profits (or somewhere in that range) last year.

He’s so far out of this depth. I want to be able to laugh about it but I care too much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, spiritof66 said:

I have an uneasy feeling that we just saw the first installment of a battle for fourth place in the AL East.

Ha my friend who’s a Sox fan said the same thing earlier today. Still too soon I think. Give the pitching a month. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...