Jump to content

Anthony Santander 2023


interloper

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

Santander is a better hitter who is trending in the right direction career performance wise. Mountcastle is going the wrong way the last couple of years. He just doesn’t have the plate discipline to hit in the middle of the order on a contender. In big spots you just walk whoever is in front of him and get him out consistently by getting him to chase. Most of the time he will get himself out.

He hit .240s each of the last two years and hit .205 through April.  A hot month doesn’t show you are trending anywhere it just means you are hot right now.  Mateo April didn’t all the sudden make him trending better.  
 

This season Mountcastle with runners in scoring position .230 aveage .830 OpS.  Santander .238 .851 Ops  They are very similar with runners in scoring position.  There is little difference in the two over last 2+ years and not much difference with runners in scoring position this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bpilktree said:

He hit .240s each of the last two years and hit .205 through April.  A hot month doesn’t show you are trending anywhere it just means you are hot right now.  Mateo April didn’t all the sudden make him trending better.  
 

This season Mountcastle with runners in scoring position .230 aveage .830 OpS.  Santander .238 .851 Ops  They are very similar with runners in scoring position.  There is little difference in the two over last 2+ years and not much difference with runners in scoring position this year.  

Why is 2+ years the timeframe rather than 1+? By any chance is it because you want to include Mountcastle's best year? Santander has performed better recently, and has steadily increased his walk rate and OBP. Mountcastle's best year was still only 114 OPS+ relative to the league, whereas Mountcastle has a 119 and 135 to his name, plus working on 137 vs 94 currently. Mountcastle also strikes out more.  You are right that the difference between the two is not as extreme as you might think from the chatter on the boards, but I think it's fair to say Santander has a significantly better resume. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bpilktree said:

He hit .240s each of the last two years and hit .205 through April.  A hot month doesn’t show you are trending anywhere it just means you are hot right now.  Mateo April didn’t all the sudden make him trending better.  
 

This season Mountcastle with runners in scoring position .230 aveage .830 OpS.  Santander .238 .851 Ops  They are very similar with runners in scoring position.  There is little difference in the two over last 2+ years and not much difference with runners in scoring position this year.  

Who would you say had the better season last year? Who would you say is having the better season this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think Santander and Mountcastle have been pretty similar hitters over the last couple of years, and there may be some recency bias here based on the fact that Sanatander was hot in May.   But in the 2021-23 timeframe offered by @bpilktree, Santander's 113 OPS is solidly better than Mouncastle's 108, and the trend line is better.  Also, Santander has been worth 3.3 rWAR, 3.9 fWAR in that timeframe, while Mouncastle has been worth 2.6 rWAR, 2.0 fWAR.   So, Santander has been substantially more valuable (ignoring salary considerations for the moment).

I think the bigger concern right now is that Mountcastle has put up a really terrible OBP for two months in a row.   He still has four months to right the ship.   He has been a torrid hitter in June in his career -- .312/.364/.624.  The weather is heating up and some of those high-xBA batted balls that have been outs should start to carry and turn into extra base hits.  

So, we will see if Mountcastle can get into a groove and improve his numbers.  Past history suggests that he can, but he has to go out and do it.   Longer term, though, we may need to consider whether a player who posts a sub-.300 OBP 4 months out of every 6 (as he did last year) is worth keeping around because he's hot the other 2 months.  It's been a bit that way for Santander, too, but a bit less extreme.  

I think the reason people are hard on Mountcastle is because we can see he is quite talented, but he's been completely unable to curb his bad habit of swinging at pitches out of the zone, and in fact, has been worse than ever this year (44.7 O-swing%).   Santander isn't great at it either (39.1% this year), but you sense he's making an effort.  Mountcastle doesn't seem to care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Just now, Just Regular said:

Every now and then I have moments of wondering is he approaching qualifying offer worthiness.

In the 2025 draft, Elias' dream scenario is picking 30th, 31st, 32nd and 33rd thanks to a Santander comp pick and going 1-2 in the 2024 Rookie of the Year race with Cowser/Kjerstad.

Pretty sure a team can't get two ROY picks in the same year.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Pretty sure a team can't get two ROY picks in the same year.

Ah, okay.    I know I don't have fluency yet with those details.    I believe the Clubs only got 1 out of 4 possibles for this year's draft as Adley and the Atlanta guys missed for various reasons.

The draft just a couple weeks out, I'm learning the Julio pick is 29 overall as Mets/Dodgers got $$$ penalized out of their natural Round 1 position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/26/2023 at 7:26 PM, Frobby said:

Feels like this thread is bump-worthy, as Santander is back up to .271/.334/.502 and also has played some really good defense of late.  Five homers in his last six games, including the last three in a row.  

I was just looking at Santander's mid-season numbers.  He's living up to every hope I had.  He's on a 100 RBI pace, and a tick under .500 slugging.  His fielding is underrated.  

I think he's way underrated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Baltimorecuse said:

I was just looking at Santander's mid-season numbers.  He's living up to every hope I had.  He's on a 100 RBI pace, and a tick under .500 slugging.  His fielding is underrated.  

I think he's way underrated.

Agree. I'd hate to move him. If it comes down to a roster crunch situation, I'd rather outright release Hicks for nothing than trade Santander for something that might not move the needle that much. I don't think he's the type of player that goes out in a package for a deadline arm, but I could be wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Baltimorecuse said:

I was just looking at Santander's mid-season numbers.  He's living up to every hope I had.  He's on a 100 RBI pace, and a tick under .500 slugging.  His fielding is underrated.  

I think he's way underrated.

Yep he's having a really nice season, especially when you factor in his slow start. From an outsider's view, it also seems like he's more of a veteran leader in the clubhouse this year. In general he seems a lot more comfortable, he no longer uses the interpreter during post game interviews and seems to give honest, well thought out answers; I've also seen multiple instances in the last week or two when he's joking around and having a good time 1 on 1 with the younger guys (Adley and Gunnar). When asked in his post game interview yesterday about how much fun he's having, his response was great and was a good indication of how comfortable he is as a veteran leader on the team. 

 

His OBP improvement over the last few years is very impressive; .286 in 2021 to .342 in 1H of 2023. Although slugging improvement shouldn't be ignored either, .433 in 2021 to .498 in 1H of 2023. Hope he keeps it up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we keep him i get it and I'll hope for a continued monster season. He does seems like a potential obvious move to make for Elias given the roster crunch and his 1 1/2 remaining years left. We aren't extending him, and he doesn't really have the best track record of health or consistency. Sure maybe he's just a late bloomer like Nelson Cruz but Mullins/Hays/Cowser/Hicks is still a solid outfield, and it seems like we aren't giving up on Mountcastle at 1B. That with Ohearn still there and Kjerstad in the wings. We could potentially trade AS alone or with lower level prospects and get back the pitching we'd want. That without giving up ANY of our real prospects until the offseason. A 3 team trade could really behoove us. Just a thought anyway, but loving what he's been doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, G54377 said:

If we keep him i get it and I'll hope for a continued monster season. He does seems like a potential obvious move to make for Elias given the roster crunch and his 1 1/2 remaining years left. We aren't extending him, and he doesn't really have the best track record of health or consistency. Sure maybe he's just a late bloomer like Nelson Cruz but Mullins/Hays/Cowser/Hicks is still a solid outfield, and it seems like we aren't giving up on Mountcastle at 1B. That with Ohearn still there and Kjerstad in the wings. We could potentially trade AS alone or with lower level prospects and get back the pitching we'd want. That without giving up ANY of our real prospects until the offseason. A 3 team trade could really behoove us. Just a thought anyway, but loving what he's been doing.

Cowser has a LOT TO PROVE.  AS is doing it.  I wish I had a dime for every POTENTIAL star who never panned out.  

All the stars that ever were

Are parking cars and pumping gas

 

 

Edited by Baltimorecuse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Baltimorecuse said:

I was just looking at Santander's mid-season numbers.  He's living up to every hope I had.  He's on a 100 RBI pace, and a tick under .500 slugging.  His fielding is underrated.  

I think he's way underrated.

He’s not on a 100 RBI pace though.   The O’s hss as be played 55% of their season and he’s at 50 RBI.   He’s on about a 91 RBI pace.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Baltimorecuse said:

Cowser has a LOT TO PROVE.  AS is doing it.  I wish I had a dime for every POTENTIAL star who never panned out.  

All the stars that ever were

Are parking cars and pumping gas

 

 

No doubt, but Santander could also flame out in the second half or next year. We roll the dice either way. So far he has alternated good and bad months. He had a 642 OPS in April and a 702 OPS in June. He's also battled injures just about every year up until last, IIRC. People may be overrating our prospects, but they may also be overrating Santander. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think you have to ignore PEDs.  I think you have to look at it under the context of: 1. PEDs have been part of baseball since the inception and continue to be a part of the game.  They are part of the fabric of the game whether we like it or not. Read any book about baseball from the 20s-70s and PED use was rampant.  2. In his specific era, MLB looked the other way, almost encouraged the use, and almost all players were using PEDs (whether that be needle use or other products).  Even if they weren’t using a banned substance, they were using some type of PED.   3. Players who admitted to usage (or even were very strongly assumed to be users) have never even come close to what he was able to do in every facet of the game.  What he did showed the absolute pinnacle of baseball ability/achievement.  He was the most entertaining player to watch while he was at his peak. The fact that he dwarfed all other players, who were using, in every part of the game (defense, base running, contact ability, swing decision, power) showed his greatness.  He was almost 2x better than the league average player over his career and for a span of 4 years was 2.5X better than the league average player.  He was the greatest player ever and we will never see anything like it again. 
    • I’m all for bringing Mayo up and putting Westburg at 2B whether Mateo is injured or not.   How much do you know about Mateo’s injury?
    • He has been outstanding, and, yes, whoda thunk it?
    • The ROY the year stuff is very debatable. I’d argue we are worse off losing a year of Gunnar Henderson than an extra pick. Now if Cowser won it, that would be different.
    • I know Mateo finished the game but there is absolutely no reason for him to tough it through that game injury. Just bring up Mayo and put Westy at second.
    • Why wouldn’t September days count? I think you were right the first time. https://www.mlb.com/glossary/rules/rookie-eligibility   In any case, I think it’s roster space much more than ROY eligibility holding Mayo in AAA right now. If he’d help them win more games right now he should be called up. If they get closer to a point where they can snag keeping him ROY eligible they may consider it - e.g., if they don’t make space at the trade deadline end of July, maybe they go a couple weeks with somebody else before calling up Mayo mid-August. I think it will naturally work out to have one of Holliday or Mayo be ROY eligible next year but not a priority for either of them. Holliday only had 2 weeks earlier, so I think he could be the callup when rosters expand September 1 and stay under 45 days (and that was perhaps deliberate in the timing of the decision to send him down). But I think, at a minimum, Mayo will be on the postseason roster to be DH vs LHP. We usually use Adley with McCann catching during the regular season, but obviously Adley will catch every game in the playoffs. So Mayo needs to get enough MLB reps to feel comfortable with him in that role at least.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...