Jump to content

Orioles power rankings, 2023


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Frankly, I think the power rankings published by various sites are just click bait, since the only rankings that actually matter are the standings.   But, I’m no more immune to click bait than anyone else, so feel free to post such rankings here.

Fangraphs is out with their rankings today and puts the Orioles in “Tier 4 - Solid Contenders.”   Rare to hear that from Fangraphs!   Here’s their comment:

“The Orioles have gotten off to a strong start behind their young and athletic lineup. They’re running all over the opposition behind strong showings from Adley Rutschman and Ryan Mountcastle. Uber-prospect Gunnar Henderson has been slow to get his rookie campaign off the ground, but he is walking in nearly a quarter of his at-bats. With that kind of plate discipline, the hits will eventually follow. Baltimore finally called up Grayson Rodriguez, too. He’s gotten off to a decent start to his big league career, with his eight strikeouts against the White Sox yesterday a highlight.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF we get any kind of consistent starting pitching, I like our chances.  It's a big IF but not farfetched to think we can fashion a rotation of the 6 we have.   I like the way the bullpen seems to be coming together.   It's going to be interesting to see if Cano and Baumann can continue to look good, especially Cano, who looks like he's got top tier stuff.

Currently, the lineup has no holes.   I mean, sure, Santander and Henderson haven't totally broken out yet, but with Mateo hitting and Frazier continuing to have good AB's, there are no real holes in the lineup moving forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

IF we get any kind of consistent starting pitching, I like our chances.  It's a big IF but not farfetched to think we can fashion a rotation of the 6 we have.   I like the way the bullpen seems to be coming together.   It's going to be interesting to see if Cano and Baumann can continue to look good, especially Cano, who looks like he's got top tier stuff.

Currently, the lineup has no holes.   I mean, sure, Santander and Henderson haven't totally broken out yet, but with Mateo hitting and Frazier continuing to have good AB's, there are no real holes in the lineup moving forward.

Re: your bullpen comment, I kiiiind of agree. But it's still pretty dicey in there.

Felix: awesome
Baker: good, hope he keeps it up
Baumann: great to see him have success, I'm fairly bullish
Coulombe: basically the guy holding this thing together

but then...

Perez: yikes
Akin: yikes
Voth: yikes
Gillaspie: meh, I don't think I'm a believer yet
Cano: waiting for the other shoe to drop

I feel like Givens is sorely needed and that's an iffy position to feel like Givens is a bullpen savior.

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, interloper said:

Re: your bullpen comment, I kiiiind of agree. But it's still pretty dicey in there.

Felix: awesome
Baker: good, hope he keeps it up
Baumann: great to see him have success, I'm fairly bullish
Coulombe: basically the guy holding this thing together

but then...

Perez: yikes
Akin: yikes
Voth: yikes
Gillaspie: meh, I don't think I'm a believer yet
Cano: waiting for the other shoe to drop

I feel like Givens is sorely needed and that's an iffy position to feel like Givens is a bullpen savior.

I'll go with meh on Akins and Gillaspie.   Akins was not good 2nd half last year and looks the same so far.    I think Voth just needs to get that curve back.  He can be good but I have more faith in him being good than Akins.   Even when Akins was good last year, his stuff just doesn't do anything for me.   That's a fair comment on Cano but his minor league numbers were good, he had a good ST, and two good appearances.   He was horrible in the majors last year with the Twins and the O's.   The stuff is in plain sight though.  95-97 fastball with movement.   A workable slider and a plus changeup.    Perez has been very hittable lately but the fastball is still upper 90's.   I'm not ready to give up on him being an integral part of the bullpen.   As you said, we still have Givens and possibly Tate to add to that mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, interloper said:

Re: your bullpen comment, I kiiiind of agree. But it's still pretty dicey in there.

Felix: awesome
Baker: good, hope he keeps it up
Baumann: great to see him have success, I'm fairly bullish
Coulombe: basically the guy holding this thing together

but then...

Perez: yikes
Akin: yikes
Voth: yikes
Gillaspie: meh, I don't think I'm a believer yet
Cano: waiting for the other shoe to drop

I feel like Givens is sorely needed and that's an iffy position to feel like Givens is a bullpen savior.

I'm not ready to put Perez in the "yikes" category. His FIP is still at an excellent 2.67, with a plus fastball.  I think Voth will come back around.  He looked good yesterday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was intrigued by the write-up of the Cubs (Tier 3 - On the Cusp of Greatness!) that said that old friend Trey Mancini was contributing on offense, but then I clicked through the link. He's "contributing" to the tune of a .516 OPS and a 37 wRC+. He's been worth -.6 WAR. Oof. The much-despised Eric Hosmer also got a shout-out, and he's not doing much better. I expected more from Fangraphs, honestly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Moshagge3 said:

I was intrigued by the write-up of the Cubs (Tier 3 - On the Cusp of Greatness!) that said that old friend Trey Mancini was contributing on offense, but then I clicked through the link. He's "contributing" to the tune of a .516 OPS and a 37 wRC+. He's been worth -.6 WAR. Oof. The much-despised Eric Hosmer also got a shout-out, and he's not doing much better. I expected more from Fangraphs, honestly.

It seems to me that they are under a constant talent drain.  They develop someone and they get hired away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CaptDbog said:

I'm not ready to put Perez in the "yikes" category. His FIP is still at an excellent 2.67, with a plus fastball.  I think Voth will come back around.  He looked good yesterday. 

Yeah to clarify, Perez is a yikes right now for me, but I think he can find it again. Just isn't missing any bats, which seems to be a location issue. I certainly don't see him being in danger of losing his roster spot or anything. If he can figure it out, I feel, like, 100% better about the bullpen. 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, interloper said:

Re: your bullpen comment, I kiiiind of agree. But it's still pretty dicey in there.

Felix: awesome
Baker: good, hope he keeps it up
Baumann: great to see him have success, I'm fairly bullish
Coulombe: basically the guy holding this thing together

but then...

Perez: yikes
Akin: yikes
Voth: yikes
Gillaspie: meh, I don't think I'm a believer yet
Cano: waiting for the other shoe to drop

I feel like Givens is sorely needed and that's an iffy position to feel like Givens is a bullpen savior.

When is Dillon Tate expected back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...