Jump to content

Elias & Prospect Promotion


casadeozo

Recommended Posts

44 minutes ago, Orioles0615 said:

The “tHeY WiLl StRugGle” excuse is just as stupid as the they will lose their trade value excuse 

It really is a mystery why Westburg hasnt been promoted. "They will struggle" is just as good a reason as any. I am starting to get the feeling Westburg will stay down until he is forced to be protected from rule 5 next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

It really is a mystery why Westburg hasnt been promoted. "They will struggle" is just as good a reason as any. I am starting to get the feeling Westburg will stay down until he is forced to be protected from rule 5 next year.

I have a feeling that will happen with most guys. They won't promote them unless they are forced to by the rule 5 or they turn 25. They obssess over 40 man spots even though their are still several guys that can go and won't be missed. They keep all these scrub picthers on their who never come up or come up and then don't picth and are sent down a day later. They seem to just want to hoard prospects. People can say we will trade for picthing, will we though? Are we really going to trade Westburg for the Jordan Montgomery's and Rich Hill's of the world? 

Edited by Orioles0615
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Orioles0615 said:

I have a feeling that will happen with most guys. They won't promote them unless they are forced to by the rule 5 or they turn 25. They obssess over 40 man spots even though their are still several guys that can go and won't be missed. They keep all these scrub picthers on their who never come up or come up and then don't picth and are sent down a day later. They seem to just want to hoard prospects. People can say we will trade for picthing, will we though? Are we really going to trade Westburg for the Jordan Montgomery's and Rich Hill's of the world? 

I hope that we are able to do better than Montgomery for Westburg (or a package that Westburg is not included in). 

Listening to Elias’ comments yesterday, it sounds like that there is some market uncertainty given the amount of teams who are not out of it yet or who have decided to be sellers. He did hint that they would be looking at players with more years of control because he believes that the team will be good for the next few years. I thought (I am pretty sure) that I heard him use the word “window” while talking about this.

I know Bowden said Sunday and reiterated on yesterday that there may be some buyer to buyer trades. Meaning Major League players would be traded for other Major Leaguers. The example cited on 105.7 to him was Bieber from CLE going to BAL for a Mountcastle+. He didn’t really green light that but he said that could be an example of a team with more starting pitching trading to a team with more hitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Brooks The Great said:

I'm hoping the reason is that he's waiting for the Super 2 deadline to pass in a week or two.

I don’t think we disagree then… I think the fact that we have decent players already and are winning made it a situation that guys like Westburg had to beat the door down. Now that he’s done that and you see where the calendar is, things like Super 2 factor in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Is Kremer a #3 starter.   Most fans would say no.    But how far from a #3 is he?    He has a 1.09 WHIP.  His average against is .197.   He is averaging a strike out an inning.   He has probably 3 or 4  starts before the deadline.   If he pitches like a #3 in those starts could he assume that role? Many are watching to see if Elias will pull the trigger on acquiring a #3 starter.   Giving up one  or more of the O's best prospects.    But we may also be watching to see if Kremer pitches at a high level does Elias make the choice not to make that trade.
    • Hyde determines bullpen matchups prior to the game. He does not use subjective eye tests in the moment. It's a good system that did not work in this case. No eye test can convince me that Baker is a better option than anyone, ever. He is a replacement level pitcher, at best.
    • Nice. This is much better than that Twitter feed I was using. 
    • Sure. I said 10-12 feet because that would be the extreme range of the difference in how far they could cover in four seconds. As you mention real life is a bit less.
    • This doesn’t detract from your main point, but fielders don’t get up to full speed for the first 3 seconds.  On average, Santander covers 32.2 feet in the first 3 seconds, Rodriguez 36.6, per Statcast jump data.  So, the difference on a 4 second hang time ball is more like 7-8 feet rather than 10-12.  
    • I think a team like the Orioles don't really have the luxury of extending a pretty good 30-year-old outfielder. Always take bb-ref comps with a grain of salt, but Santander's top comps through age 28 include: Jay Gibbons (less than 200 PAs after 30) Mark Trumbo (below replacement from 31-on) Carlos Quentin (below replacement from 31-on) Deron Johnson (1.6 WAR in 3198 PAs from 31-on) Willie Kirkland (productive career over at 28) Bo Jackson (yes, injuries, but done at 31) Nick Esasky (last good year at 29) Josh Reddick (OPS'd .711 with 2 WAR from 31-on) Also Paul O'Neill and Jay Buhner. So 8/10 would have been terrible choices to extend at 30.
    • The Statcast data does help highlight the silliness of errors. Or some of them. Rodriguez has a top sprint speed of over 29 feet/second, while Anthony Santander is at 26. On a 4-second hang time ball Rodriguez will be able to cover roughly 10-12 additional feet. So if a ball goes off his glove at the end he likely gets an error, while on the very same ball Santander gets credit for chasing a double or a triple up the gap. And then back to our discussion yesterday about ERA in another thread, whomever was on the mound is absolved from the Rodriguez error, while they take full blame for Santander allowing the extra-base hit.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...