Jump to content

Blue Jays series - round 2


Frobby

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

Don't worry. If things start to look tough, all Hyde has to do is talk to Schneider enough to make him forget how many times a Blue Jay coach has visted the mound and then pick a new pitcher!

They cut to Schneider at one point last night and the guy looked like he wanted to crawl into a hole and never come out. His seat might be pretty warm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Just Regular said:

Berrios has kept the runs off the board last 3 turns, but the peripherals have gone south.

All the same stuff from yesterday about Bassitt applies to Berrios too for the races between the Adley and Vlad teams this decade.     The Jays have more or less put all their pillars in place, and I believe they will have a tough time keeping Matt Chapman with Vlad/Bo both still tick tocking through Arb.

I hadn't noticed day game Thursday until last night, so come 7pm it is one of those 2 games in 20 hours mid-week times.

9 of the next 16 games will be afternoon games and 3 days off sprinkled in between.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 86this said:

9 of the next 16 games will be afternoon games and 3 days off sprinkled in between.

Yep, I was just noticing that after tonight, I will only be able to watch 2 Oriole games before next Friday.   There are 3 weekday day games when I am at work, one game on Peacock, and two days off in that span.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Baltimorecuse said:

The Jays' pitcher tonight has been absolute shutdown the last four starts and he was pretty good before that.  I'm excited to see if we get the good Bradish tonight.  Can hardly wait for 7 o'clock.  

 

Berrios is also 9-0 against the O's. Should be interesting if Bradish can keep pace with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Malike said:

He's still a fantastic pitcher who has actually been really good for his past 7 starts, not 4. I doubt we roll him. Hopefully, we can keep it close.

No argument on his pitching but this isn't the team he beat 9 times.  I said going into this series that this would be a good test which makes it a big series,  I got flamed.  

 

Edited by Baltimorecuse
add info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 86this said:

9 of the next 16 games will be afternoon games and 3 days off sprinkled in between.

I know Wrigley Field used to have 100% day games when they didn't have lights, but it's odd that this Friday's game won't be at night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Baltimorecuse said:

No argument on his pitching but this isn't the team he beat 9 times.  I said going into this series that this would be a good test which makes it a big series,  I got flamed.  

 

Who would flame you for that? Toronto is under-performing but they are a really talented team and this series is no cakewalk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Malike said:

Who would flame you for that? Toronto is under-performing but they are a really talented team and this series is no cakewalk.

Seriously, I was flamed for saying this was an important series.  So i gave the guy four or five reasons why it's important.  One reason I didn't mention is "Big Mo."  We take this series we play NY with the wind at our back.  Psychological momentum is very important in my view.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rm5678 said:

I know Wrigley Field used to have 100% day games when they didn't have lights, but it's odd that this Friday's game won't be at night.

I think all their Friday home games are day games.

They tend to play their night games on Mon-Thu for the most part, assuming they don't get a ESPN Sunday Night game or something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...