Jump to content

Orioles To Designate Spenser Watkins For Assignment


RVAOsFan

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

So now they have 4 catchers on the 40. I don’t see how Bemboom is superior enough to Godoy to make this move, unless they feel like McCann will be out longer than they anticipated and want a lefty bat.

I wonder if Elias blocked Kolosvary’s number…

Bemboom is superior defensively and with the pitchers from what I have read.  Can't hit but that is not what the O's are focused on apparently.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Super 2 is definitely past us

Is it? I thought it wasn't sure and it might be in late June? Honestly, I'm never good at knowing those dates so it would not surprise me. 

Either way, this team should not be running O'Hearn out to RF and while Hicks has been very good since he's been an Orioles, I don't think he should be the everyday right fielder over Cowser after Mullins returns. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

Is it? I thought it wasn't sure and it might be in late June? Honestly, I'm never good at knowing those dates so it would not surprise me. 

Either way, this team should not be running O'Hearn out to RF and while Hicks has been very good since he's been an Orioles, I don't think he should be the everyday right fielder over Cowser after Mullins returns. 

 

It’s never been this late…I don’t think it was ever as late as even last week.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I mean, this may be what they say but it’s factually wrong. There is plenty of playing time for both of them if they are actually interested in putting the best and highest upside team out there that they can.

They don’t have to play 6-7 games a Week to justify being up here.

Right.  Especially with the way this team loves the righty/lefty matchup thing, there are plenty of opportunities for them to play 4-5 times a week.

I don't currently think there's room for both Ortiz and Westburg without seriously cutting into the playing time of Mateo.  Which I'd be perfectly OK with, but I truly think they see Mateo as a core piece.

All roads lead back to Frazier lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, glenn__davis said:

Right.  Especially with the way this team loves the righty/lefty matchup thing, there are plenty of opportunities for them to play 4-5 times a week.

I don't currently think there's room for both Ortiz and Westburg without seriously cutting into the playing time of Mateo.  Which I'd be perfectly OK with, but I truly think they see Mateo as a core piece.

All roads lead back to Frazier lol.

If they STILL see Mateo as a core piece, then I seriously have to start questioning their judgement.  His playing time NEEDS seriously cut.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

If they STILL see Mateo as a core piece, then I seriously have to start questioning their judgement.  His playing time NEEDS seriously cut.  
 

I think they see the speed and defense and are willing to give him more time to snap out of the slump. He has shown some signs recently that things could turn around.

But you have to think that time is not on his side right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I think they see the speed and defense and are willing to give him more time to snap out of the slump. He has shown some signs recently that things could turn around.

But you have to think that time is not on his side right now.

I suppose it depends on how you define 'core piece'.  If you are saying as a defensive replacement, pinch runner, guy off the bench with an OCCASIONAL start, then sure, sign me up.  But someone starting 5+ games a week...that time is over IMO.  He's shown his cold spells are way too long, his hot spells are way too short, and he's just overall not good enough and consistent enough with the bat to justify keeping him as a starter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

If they STILL see Mateo as a core piece, then I seriously have to start questioning their judgement.  His playing time NEEDS seriously cut.  

I agree with you, but Elias specifically mentioned him a few weeks back on the broadcast, and he still plays just about every day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, forphase1 said:

I suppose it depends on how you define 'core piece'.  If you are saying as a defensive replacement, pinch runner, guy off the bench with an OCCASIONAL start, then sure, sign me up.  But someone starting 5+ games a week...that time is over IMO.  He's shown his cold spells are way too long, his hot spells are way too short, and he's just overall not good enough and consistent enough with the bat to justify keeping him as a starter.  

Oh I agree. No one in their right mind should put him in the same category as guys like Adley, Mullins, Bautista and Gunnar. 
 

We currently have a MI that has a combined 1.1 fWAR and it’s dropping, not improving. I don’t see how anyone is ok with that when we have elite level, legit prospects ready to play right now.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Its pretty simple.  Elias wants Cowser and Westburg to play everyday and there is not enough playing time for that to happen with the O's.   

They promoted Ortiz and he hardly plays.

Would that imply that Elias doesn't think as highly of Ortiz, given that he doesn't seem to care if he plays every day?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, deward said:

Would that imply that Elias doesn't think as highly of Ortiz, given that he doesn't seem to care if he plays every day?

I think that might be true but that Ortiz is n the 40 man probably means as much or more. I think ME doesn't want more than 1 rookie struggling at a time on the MLB club. It's Ortiz's time in the barrel, I hope he gets the chance to show his glove plays at all 3 positions at least, even if his bat doesn't so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I mean Adley’s attempted hit vs Witt is a good example. Adley hit it harder…but missed for a few feet. That happens. But even softly hit balls find green…the Os aren’t..others are…like Detroit..like KC vs us. They win on an IF hit, Westburg’s ball is a homer in 28 of 30 parks.   
    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...