Jump to content

Kjerstad and Baker called up


Brian88

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, dtk9119 said:

Mountcastle not going on IL yet either means its not as bad as thought last night and he's day to day or they are still evaluating. Hopefully, he'll avoid the IL. If he does end up going on it, McKenna or Cowser will probably be called back up. Really wish we had a RH 1B that could replace Mountcastle if needed. Although at least for the next 4-5 games we are facing RH pitchers.

We do have a RH 1B, Coby Mayo. He’s hit just as well as Kjerstad in AAA.

If Mountcastle has to go on the IL, they should call Mayo up once we are past all the RH starting pitchers. It will probably be McKenna (since Mountcastle to IL would allow skipping the 10 day waiting), but Mayo makes more sense. 

Also makes sense to give it a bit of time to see if an IL stint is needed for Mountcastle. They wouldn’t use either Mayo or McKenna much in this series. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Kjerstad is postseason eligible by replacing Vavra. For Mayo to be postseason eligible for replacing Mountcastle, Mountcastle would need to spend 10 days on IL before the postseason. So they could conceivably wait until the HOU series to make a call on whether Mountcastle needs to go on IL. 

There is no concern about post season eligibility. Anybody who was in the system on August 31 (Mayo, Holliday, etc.) could also replace either Akin or Dillon Tate, as both are on the 60-day IL and would otherwise be eligible.

This is why postseason eligibility isn't a big deal as long as the player is in the system on August 31.

See here for more info.

Edited by MurphDogg
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, interloper said:

Remember, you can always just right click to copy an image on, say, Twitter, and then just paste here. 

85i27rsd o

Thanks. I was having trouble getting the message board to convert it to an image. I dinner know if its because I'm on my phone, but it seems like a 50/50 crap shoot to get it to work as intended and show pictures. I seem to have better luck from my desktop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I think Baker on paper matched us better than Vespi with the upcoming competition. 

Baker's AAA numbers don't look too hot, but I like having him here for this series. I theorized in another thread that the reason Irvin was demoted was to have a more playoff-like bullpen for this Rays series, where you drop your bulk innings guys and have a lot of short-stint K guys. 

If Baker does well this month there's a chance he could finish ahead of Irvin/Gibson/Flaherty in October IP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I wonder if Vavra was told that his shoulder was hurting really bad or he might be DFA'ed?  So odd that he went on the 60 day IL that quick.  😝

How many games are left in the MiLB season? If there's no chance he's on the ML roster anymore this season and he's going to be hurt for 2-3 more weeks, I think it only makes since. I think it is a clever use of the rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Kjerstad is postseason eligible by replacing Vavra. For Mayo to be postseason eligible for replacing Mountcastle, Mountcastle would need to spend 10 days on IL before the postseason. So they could conceivably wait until the HOU series to make a call on whether Mountcastle needs to go on IL. 

That's great news that he's postseason eligible.

I mean I like McKenna and he provided some fun plays on defense recently but Kjerstad's bat is a major upgrade.  So long as Mullins and Hicks are healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • What he's been able to do at the plate has been a nice pick-me-up for the a team that has had multiple hitters struggling at the same time. For me though, watching how he's handled 2B this season has been a treat. The tag on the SB attempt last night was a play that not all 2B make.    There's been times I would have traded or released him for nothing, but right now I'm really glad he's still here.
    • If he stays right where he is right now hitting .245, he has very nice value. On pace for a 3-4 war season. As a secondary piece, that’s huge.
    • Adding relievers should be the priority, but that doesn't mean Elias won't look to strengthen our staff or add a hitter as well.  I'm not expecting us to trade for Luzardo, but it's a possibility with the injuries that our staff has been through. 
    • Luzardo is a really interesting target. On one hand, he is your Burnes replacement. A guy with high end starter potential (although less of a sure thing than Burnes) who you would have for 2 more years. OTOH, it feels like he could be a ticking time bomb…and yes you can say that about most pitchers but some are worse than others. Im not sure im giving up Povich or McDermott in a Luzardo deal because we just don’t have much depth right now after them. A year or 2 from now, the depth has the potential to look a lot better but we aren’t there yet. Besides the obvious 3 prospects, DeLeon, Povich and McDermott are the next 3 guys I really want to keep if possible. Everyone else is on the table although I certainly would prefer to use other intl guys vs Liranzo and Sosa. Using some kind of combo of Kjerstad, Stowers, Norby, Fabian, any of the veteran OFers/OHearn/Mounty and any of the draft picks from last year are amongst the group of guys I would be looking to move first.  Try to build a package(s) around that group of players and see what you can come up with.
    • Maybe John Means could masquerade as a healthy Chayce McDermott. https://www.milb.com/player/chayce-mcdermott-694646
    • I’m not sure trading for an impact starter is best use of resources. We still have six starters at the MLB level in Burnes, Bradish, GRod, Irvin, Kremer, and Suarez. Then Povich looks like he deserves a shot if needed.    Burnes, Bradish, GRod are the obvious playoff trio.    further injuries would change things, obviously, but at the moment I don’t see a clear need (and would have to pay handsomely for an upgrade). If someone would want Kremer as a part of the package, then maybe it makes sense. 
    • When Kremer comes back you have Burnes, Bradish, GRod, Kremer, Irvin Suarez in the bullpen.  Povich and McDermott at Norfolk. Absent further injury I don’t see Elias doing what it would probably take for Luzardo.  The relievers like Scott, Harvey, etc. will be cheaper.        
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...