Jump to content

Starters: Bradish game 1, GRod game 2


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Justinlstn said:

Just looked up GRods stats vs Texas this season. Last time he faced them, was May 10. 3.1 in innings 6 hits, 9 runs, 3hrs and 3 walks. Obviously that was a different time for him during the season but still is worrisome.

It was actually May 26 and it was his last game before being sent down.  He's a completely different pitcher.  Doesn't mean the Rangers won't get to him, but his approach and mindset is not the same.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, btownoriole said:

It was actually May 26 and it was his last game before being sent down.  He's a completely different pitcher.  Doesn't mean the Rangers won't get to him, but his approach and mindset is not the same.

You're right, I miss read. Was 10th game he pitched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, EdwinRip said:

The Ranger’s park favors left handed batters over righties.

So does ours, probably moreso.

I would have started Means in game 2 but I can see points on both sides.   While I disagree with the decison I don't think it is a horrible one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said in the other thread predicting the starters, I don’t think there’s enough evidence there to suggest that there’s some strategic advantage to using Means at OPACY that would outweigh the fact that Grayson is simply the significantly better pitcher at this point.

Yes, OPACY is a better park for LH power hitters. But I don’t see any evidence in the small samples we have with both guys (Means post-injury and Grayson 2.0) that suggests that Means would be better at suppressing lefty power. With his changeup humming (and his curveball not), he’s actually had reverse splits thus far in his brief return — and he’s given up 2 HRs in the 23 PAs he’s had against LHH.

The Rangers are better against finesse pitchers (like Means) and flyball pitchers (like Means). His curveball, their biggest (and only?) weakness this season, has been his worst pitch thus far. It gives me serious concern about how he’ll hold up. The Rangers typically pulverize the ball in their stadium, so we’ve got to maximize our opportunities to grab wins while we’re at home.

I think the goal has to be to try to jump out to a lead in the series, and Grayson is just better than Means. And the chance to have him come back and pitch a couple piggyback innings behind Bradish in Game 5 is the icing on the cake that seals the deal for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • This Oriole team has much better talent.  Gunner Henderson, Jordan Westberg, Adley, Santander, Grayson, and Corbin Burnes don’t have a 4-32 streak in them.  Even if they fill the rest of the positions with OH posters.  I think a rotation of Burnes, Grayson, and Kremer as your top 3 is a better than 500 team the rest of the way at least.  The jury is out on Povich but if he pitches as well as he has the Orioles with this offense will have a good chance to win when he starts.  Is the team good enough to win it all?  They need help most likely.  One consistent starter and a couple of better arms in the bullpen.  This team is going to the playoffs.  To think they are not at this point is based on emotion and not anything else.  
    • It’s funny that people are wanting to bring back Tanner Scott and his 6.1 walk rate, but balking at McDermott and his 5.5 walk rate. I’m leery of McDermott too, but as they say, “any port in a storm,” so no reason not to give him a try.
    • It sort of makes no sense, his GB% is much higher than last year but his HR/FB went from 10% last year to 26% this year. Walks are way up too.
    • Suarez and Irvin were always going to regress. You didn’t think they would be sub 3 ERA pitchers did you?  Irvin is a solid guy for the back of the rotation but that’s what he is, a back of rotation guy. They are pieces you need to eat innings and keep you in most games but these aren’t world beaters on the mound. Suarez is a good story but there is a reason he has had the career he has had. The fear that we will slowly sink is an unfounded and irrational fear. The team has to get better and they have to improve on obvious needs but we don’t need to go overboard here.  All teams have holes they need to address.
    • Good point.  Every now and then he looks like vintage Cano from early last year but he’s no longer trustworthy.
    • Speaking of scar tissue, a review of our storied/checkered past shows an uglier picture than we like to recall... St. Louis Browns 1902-1953: 52 years, 1 WS (1944), loss. Baltimore Orioles 1954-1983: 30 years, 6 WS (3-3), plus 2 more ALCS losses. Orioles 1984-2023: 40 years, 6 playoffs losses (1 WC, 2 ALDS, 3 ALCS).
    • Cano is having an awful season. He's been worth -0.3 fWAR with a 4.62 FIP. I know you have to use the arms you have, but you can't utilize Cano like it's 2023, he's terrible and should be the lowest-leverage reliever out of the pen right now. He's carrying the same BABIP as last year, but his results are awful.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...