Jump to content

What year do you think will be the Orioles’ peak of the next five years?


Frobby

What year do you think will be the Orioles’ peak of the next five years?  

58 members have voted

  1. 1. Which year in the next five will the Orioles have their peak team?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 11/19/23 at 20:37

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

How are you defining peak? Wins? Win a title? Most talented?

I was wondering that as well. I hate to say it but I doubt they get to 101 wins again. But I also think there are more talented teams to come. I just expect the Yankees and Red Sox to return to good teams in the near future. And I hope there’s a World Series win (or at least an appearance) in there somewhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such a fantastic question for a thread because what other organization has the internal talent where could realistically project out the next 5 years?  
 

What was that Ripken senior quote?  Something along the lines of “It’s great to be young and a Baltimore Oriole.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if the O's will exceed their 2023 win total in any of these years. 

Hard to match the record in 1-run games we had. 

That said, you can make the World Series with 84 wins and a negative run differential these days. I'm just hopeful the O's will make the playoffs 3-4 times in the next 5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

I'm not sure if the O's will exceed their 2023 win total in any of these years. 

Hard to match the record in 1-run games we had. 

That said, you can make the World Series with 84 wins and a negative run differential these days. I'm just hopeful the O's will make the playoffs 3-4 times in the next 5 years.

I don’t equate “peak” with “most wins.”   I think it will be very tough to top 101 wins.  Only three Orioles teams have ever done it.   But I think we will have better teams than the last one even if they win fewer games in the regular season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

I don’t equate “peak” with “most wins.”   I think it will be very tough to top 101 wins.  Only three Orioles teams have ever done it.   But I think we will have better teams than the last one even if they win fewer games in the regular season.  

I include post season results when I think of a team's peak.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I include post season results when I think of a team's peak.

 

I do too, but it’s tricky.   Sometimes great teams flop in the postseason.  Sometimes mediocre teams do well.   But I think there will be O’s teams that win the AL East, do well in the postseason, have a better run differential than in 2023 and are less reliant on RISP hitting to generate their offensive numbers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I do too, but it’s tricky.   Sometimes great teams flop in the postseason.  Sometimes mediocre teams do well.   But I think there will be O’s teams that win the AL East, do well in the postseason, have a better run differential than in 2023 and are less reliant on RISP hitting to generate their offensive numbers.  

I factor it in, I don't use it exclusively.

For instance I consider the 2014 team more successful than the 2023 team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I factor it in, I don't use it exclusively.

For instance I consider the 2014 team more successful than the 2023 team.

I'd agree they were more successful, but were they a better team?   

Regular season wins: 101 in 2023, 96 in 2014.

Post season wins: 3 in 2014, 0 in 2014.

Run differential: 131 in 2023, 112 in 2014.

OPS+: 107 in 2023, 104 in 2014.

ERA+: 115 in 2014, 106 in 2023.

I am inclined to give the nod to the 2023 team because the AL East competition was much better in 2023 than in 2014.   So, they won 5 more games with a significantly more difficult schedule.   Also, though the pitching was better in 2014, there was an element of flukiness to it.  The same pitchers were not nearly as successful in the seasons that preceded or followed that one.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • It is absolutely possible. In 2022, the Mets gave a QO to Bassitt, Nikki, and DeGrom. The Red Sox gave a QO to Boegarts and Eovaldi. The Yankees gave a QO to Judge and Rizzo. The Dodgers gave a QO to Turner and Anderson. I know that it seems to be a foregone conclusion that Santander will not be on the team after this season, and while I generally agree that it is more probable than not that he will not be re-signed, I do think there is a non-zero chance that he will be retained. I think he is the most likely of Mullins, Hays, and himself to be retained, even if it is a small chance. The team has told us how they feel about his bat because he plays essentially everyday, and I have heard Kostka say that they value his clubhouse presence.
    • Santander won’t get a QO, and if he did, he would accept. His defense is declining and we have too many capable youngsters who should replace him effectively. But to your question, I don’t know if there’s a limit, but I doubt it.
    • O's will probably have to wait till July for a trade because there are so many more buyers than sellers.  I think teams like the Blue Jays, Rays Tigers and Mets are likely to be sellers but they are still in the race although not very good teams as constituted. 
    • No Scott. He’s way too undependable. We need someone who WON’T enter a game and walk folks like he’s promoting a healthy lifestyle. He’s been a lot bette4 this season, but he’s too undependable, and we already have too many of those. No Flaherty either. That’s like taking your GF back after she cheated on you.
    • The team's continued success has really put Elias on the spot IMO and I don't see a Flaherty type as an option anymore.  My money is on a sensible trade that comes at a price high enough that most of us here, including myself, won't like, but a premium comes with having bad luck and that's where the O's are at the moment.
    • I would be very surprised if every last one of the GM's Elias talks to about quality starting pitching doesn't start by asking about Westburg and the rest.  Again, I think it's a mistake to believe that the O's have a ton of leverage here.  They certainly have some, and Elias is smart and disciplined, but I don't see any bargains.  I especially don't see the luxury of acting like youth and multiple years of control is any kind of rigid starting point for the O's.
    • I say this as someone who defended Cowser like 2 posts ago, but like his fWAR number is entirely dependent on how much you're buying his defense.  I can totally buy the argument that maybe OAA is overrating him a bit, so he's not really on pace to be a 5.5 win player.  The OAA number is pretty eye-popping.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...