Jump to content

How Many #1/#2 Starters Exist in MLB


GoldGlove21

How Many #1/#2 Starters Exist in MLB (Poll)  

27 members have voted

  1. 1. How Many #1/#2 Starters Exist in MLB

    • Less than 30
      19
    • More than 40
      8


Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Bradish is awesome, but every time I see something like that I always wonder how he did over his last 39 starts. They drew the line there for a reason and that reason is probably to make him look better than he is.

That’s when he started throwing a sinker in games.  That was the reason we were saying he’d be great in 2023.  He sustained success thru one offseason.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Bradish is awesome, but every time I see something like that I always wonder how he did over his last 39 starts. They drew the line there for a reason and that reason is probably to make him look better than he is.

I’d say 38 starts is a pretty good run.  I don’t really care what the numbers were before that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cole might be the only guy in the "Ace" category currently. At least with the Verlander/Scherzer/Kershaw era guys getting older and less reliable. There are probably about 15 "#1 starters" and then a whole mass of pitchers that are everything from a #2-#5 depending on personal opinion including our own Kremer.

Edited by G54377
spell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChosenOne21 said:

Bradish is awesome, but every time I see something like that I always wonder how he did over his last 39 starts. They drew the line there for a reason and that reason is probably to make him look better than he is.

Looking at his 2022 Game Log, he's been so brilliant since its surprising to see his MLB ERA was 6.25 in his initial ~70 innings before the 8/26 gem.     That's some rookie integration tax.

It wasn't until the 9/6/2022 game the Statcast Pitcher Game visualization report first outputs the Sinker as a 5th pitch.

I do believe the Level Up to MLB is so significant cutting out a player's first results in those encounters is one of the "less bad" tactics.      Grayson was also Jekyll and Hyde his Year 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I agree with those who say he probably needs to figure it out in Norfolk, however, they could bring also bring him up for a look when any of Baker, Tate, or Vespi reboard the shuttle. Maybe Povich had earned the call up, whereas they don't think McDermott has done that, but bringing him up as a temporary move couldn't hurt too much for the aforementioned pitchers.
    • Big not necessarily tall is what he is saying.....Basallo is much thicker build, which actually may be better for a catcher anyway. Pudge was not thin--even before roids.
    • With this current starting pitching as is, barring an epic collapse by the Yankees, the chances of us winning the division are very low. Right now, in just about every other series (the series that Burnes and Rodriguez don't start) we are at a talent disadvantage. We have the #1 offense in all of baseball - we have scored the most runs and hit the most home runs and have scored 8, 11, and 17 in the last 3 series and we are all of 4-6 in our last 10 games. It's hard to see us being favored against even a decent team like the Mariners (with our starting pitching as is) given the talent disadvantage in the two rotations. Now we that doesn't mean that we couldn't/wouldn't pull it out. But I doubt that we would be favorites as things are going. And then when you look at a team like the Phillies with their rotation/offense/bullpen or even the Dodgers for that matter, I believe that even if we made it that far, we would be heavy underdogs against either opponent. I don't like our chances of continuously having to rely upon "beating the odds" round after round (I didn't even mention NY if we were to meet them). This is year 3 of Adley, 2 for Gunnar, and possibly our only with Burnes. Without making significant trades or major FA acquisitions, I don't see any near future scenarios where things are better for us, we have more talent or frankly a better opportunity.  Pitching injuries are so significant and so frequent in MLB now, that future projections are hazy at best. Because it is likely that you have to make pitching additions/acquisitions EVERY YEAR in order to seriously compete. If we don't make upgrades/trades this year, when will we do it? And what will be promised to us more than it is now?
    • I was wondering if you thought Coby Mayo should be brought up Roy.  
    • Cano hasn’t achieved consistent movement with his fastball, which really requires run and sink to be effective.  He’s also been hanging too many change ups.  I big part of his turn around last year was dropping to more of a sidearm delivery and his stuff gets flat when he loses that delivery slot.    
    • We need both.  My goal would be two backend bullpen arms and one starter at the deadline.  
    • I'm sorry but who cares about his walk rate. We are using Bryan Baker. We are using Suarez as a starter. We are using Vespi. We are not in a position to nitpick the guy's walk rate.  For god's sake, call up someone who has some upside. It's not like he's going to do much worse than what we have right now. And he might just go nuts out of the bullpen. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...