Jump to content

O's Acquire OF Peyton Burdick


ThisIsBirdland

Recommended Posts

I'm glad this was a move made after the start of spring so it didn't cost us a guy on the 40-man. I'm still a bit confused on McKenna's option situation this year. But could this be the up-and-down RHH OF guy to replace McKenna? Or if McKenna is out of options and since Hillard is out of options--and considering we are expecting to see Kjerstad and Cowser in the Majors much of the year, is this more of a signing to be sure we have the flexibility to still sport a competitive team and full OF in AAA? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Baseball America's write-up in early 2023: "Burdick's calling card is his power, which showed up in an average exit velocity of 90 mph during his short stint in the big leagues. To get to that power more often, he'll need to improve his approach. If he tries to use the whole field, he'll likely see big improvements in all aspects of his offensive game. If he continues to focus on trying to hit balls out to the pull side, he'll likely fit more into a power-over-hit profile. He also showed an extreme platoon split in the minors, where he hit just .186 against righthanders over 242 at-bats. Defensively, scouts are split on where he'll wind up. He played all three spots during his time in Miami, with a heavy emphasis on both center and left field. His speed should give him a chance in center field, but scouts differ on whether he can stick at that position."

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dale said:

From Baseball America's write-up in early 2023: "Burdick's calling card is his power, which showed up in an average exit velocity of 90 mph during his short stint in the big leagues. To get to that power more often, he'll need to improve his approach. If he tries to use the whole field, he'll likely see big improvements in all aspects of his offensive game. If he continues to focus on trying to hit balls out to the pull side, he'll likely fit more into a power-over-hit profile. He also showed an extreme platoon split in the minors, where he hit just .186 against righthanders over 242 at-bats. Defensively, scouts are split on where he'll wind up. He played all three spots during his time in Miami, with a heavy emphasis on both center and left field. His speed should give him a chance in center field, but scouts differ on whether he can stick at that position."

He sounds like the Hays insurance policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, the good ol’ Avian Phallic.  

He’s got tools but strikes out a ton.  He doesn’t have great contact ability, but loads of power, decent speed and will take pitches.  

If any team can unlock his potential, it’s the Orioles, Dodgers or Rays.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the Minors he's shown good/great power and looks good with the glove. Seems like a RH version of Sam Hilliard, with less MLB experience. At this point I think I prefer both Hilliard and Burdick's skill set over McKenna. I'll be sad to see Ryan go but seems like the writing is on the wall. Between the two prospects, Stowers and now Hilliard/Burdick's arrivals, gonna be an uphill battle for McKenna to make the big league club

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

He sounds like the Hays insurance policy.

Quote

He also showed an extreme platoon split in the minors

Honestly, I kind of like that for a part-time player. Given the number of lefties we have in and around the OF (Mullins, Cowser, Kjerstad), might be good to have someone who is in a position to have better success in the opportunities available when they need days off.

Put another way, I would rather have a part-time player with .750/.650 OPS handedness splits vs. .700/.700 if I am going to be deploying them selectively anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Beg to differ. Bradish influences every fifth game; Bautista influences almost every game, because he either will pitch, or could pitch, unless the game isn’t close, which would happen enough to give him the necessary time off.
    • You didn’t answer my question. Portes 21 in high A Chace 20 in high A Young 25 in AAA Brnovich 26 in AA   Which ones are you protecting?
    • Sometime over the weekend we will probably see @Frobby's next 27-game increment report.      Last year I believe Gunnar increased his rWAR in all nine 18-game segments surveyed.     I think I joked about 27 games ago that if he continued that pattern in June, he'd be halfway to a 12-win season, and unless he goes 0-for-11 tonight or something like that we are just about there. Watching players practice their mastery of the game, it did feel to me like signal not noise an upward arc that steady in a player's first full season.    I would guess if you looked at all ~700 full time big leaguers last year, there would be 0, 1 or 2 others with that pattern.    As players oscillate around their true talent, increases in 8-9 consecutive, decently sized measuring periods would be ~500 to 1 against occurring randomly. It has to level off somewhere, but holy cow where? Since Jackie, only Bonds has 12-win seasons.    
    • Suarez has below average stuff, below average K and BB rates, and average chase and whiff rates. I think it would be tough to see him as a high leverage arm unless the stuff ticks up in relief, which it didn’t earlier this season. I think he’s better suited as the long relief option. 
    • I might be higher on Brnovich more than others.  I like his K/9 K/IP rate.  His WHIP has always been low too.  More K's than IP.  Doesn't have a bunch of baserunners.  He turns 27 shortly.  He's sort of a RH Zimmerman.  I think you protect a guy like that because he can be a up/down guy for 3 years, but also is the type of arm that would get picked in the Rule 5. We always way overestimate who would get picked in the rule 5.  IF things stay the same with Brnovich and he sniffs AAA this year, then I say in his case that we protect him.  Losing the three SP to TJ helps his case.  
    • I was going to post something like this. I strongly disagree with the concept of “closer” but we need some reliable guys who can come in the throw a clean inning. I don’t care who throws the ninth, or the eighth or the seventh, and I don’t think it should be anyone in particular. I just want him to hit the mound, throw a few uneventful pitches, and then leave the mound with nothing changed except increased anguish in the opposing dugout. And we need a starter, a good one. I wonder if Mike is looking in Korea or Japan or Mexico for someone far from the madding crowd to come be Suarez 2.0 for a while.
    • Suárez, for me, in the bullpen can profile as a high leverage arm. With McDermott there's certainly a hope that we call him up August or September and we see a high leverage arm. There are solutions in house. We probably need to trade for one pitcher more, or perhaps two, but I would probably go with the same market approach as we did last season with Flaherty and Fuji, working around the fringes and giving up more expendable prospects / players like Norby, Bradfield Jr., Horvath, Urias, Mateo, Hays, Mountcastle, etc. Another Flaherty type for this season would do us well. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...