Jump to content

Go get ________________________________


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

MLBTR is raising the question of, should Snell sign a short term deal, ala Correa.

Correa signed a 3/105 deal with an opt out after year one.

Would you sign Snell to a similar deal if ownership was good with it?

 

Yes.  He and Burnes were arguably the best 2 pitchers available this off-season.  If we landed both it would be a coup. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

MLBTR is raising the question of, should Snell sign a short term deal, ala Correa.

Correa signed a 3/105 deal with an opt out after year one.

Would you sign Snell to a similar deal if ownership was with it?

 

I would guess a short-term deal greatly benefits the team in most free agent situations. I dont think Boras or Snell are there yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

MLBTR is raising the question of, should Snell sign a short term deal, ala Correa.

Correa signed a 3/105 deal with an opt out after year one.

Would you sign Snell to a similar deal if ownership was good with it?

 

Other than the fact we are the Orioles, this makes too much sense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

MLBTR is raising the question of, should Snell sign a short term deal, ala Correa.

Correa signed a 3/105 deal with an opt out after year one.

Would you sign Snell to a similar deal if ownership was good with it?

 

Ownership is unsettled at the moment. Until MLB formally signs off on the sale and the docs are signed between Angelos and Rubenstein, I suspect Elias won’t add payroll beyond a specific already agreed to figure. With payroll already around $96 million it may be the trade deadline before a significant addition is possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, G54377 said:

Maybe there's a Miguel Gonzalez out there. 

No offense ….But it’s unwise to replace Bradish with a Miguel type project. 
 

So, I never counted on Means from the beginning. After being shutdown before the playoff with Elbow/forearm issues it’s possible he injured the new ligament.

So I’d be looking for one of the bigger names like Luzardo and a lesser guy to replace Means. Since he’s Arb 3 and all I’d release Means and use his 3.3 million else. And I wouldn’t feel bad about it. We paid him all of last year to rest and rehab. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

No offense ….But it’s unwise to replace Bradish with a Miguel type project. 
 

So, I never counted on Means from the beginning. After being shutdown before the playoff with Elbow/forearm issues it’s possible he injured the new ligament.

So I’d be looking for one of the bigger names like Luzardo and a lesser guy to replace Means. Since he’s Arb 3 and all I’d release Means and use his 3.3 million else. And I wouldn’t feel bad about it. We paid him all of last year to rest and rehab. 

Means' salary is already guaranteed.  Someone told me the union got rid of Miguel Gonzalez clause in last CBA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been said before but: Go get Trevor Bauer. League minimum, easy to cut bait with if it doesn't work out. He got railroaded, anyone with half a brain cell realizes that we as a society accept gender double standards, and tolerate more aggression towards men than we do towards women. We also tolerate more hyper-emotionalism from women than men, and give the benefit of doubt when such accusations were made. Sign Bauer, forget Luzardo.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MDS29 said:

Been said before but: Go get Trevor Bauer. League minimum, easy to cut bait with if it doesn't work out. He got railroaded, anyone with half a brain cell realizes that we as a society accept gender double standards, and tolerate more aggression towards men than we do towards women. We also tolerate more hyper-emotionalism from women than men, and give the benefit of doubt when such accusations were made. Sign Bauer, forget Luzardo.

 

 

 

If he had been in a relationship with a man and had acted the same way I'd feel the same about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

For a minute let's set aside your political opinions.

The Japanese Central League has six teams. Which means they had roughly 30 or 40 starting pitchers. Just 26 pitched 100 innings. Bauer's ranking among those pitchers:

ERA (min 100 IP): 13th
IP: 16th
H/9: 14th
HR/9: 21st
BB/9: 12th
K/9: 2nd
K/BB: 7th

Summing that up, he was a 2nd or 3rd starter in a league that sits somewhere between AAA and the Majors. And he'll come with a media circus and a PR hit.

People look at his 2.76 ERA and think "oohh.. he's great". But the Central League had a 3.15 ERA. Total runs allowed were 3.5/game, or fewer than all but two MLB seasons in 150 years of history. Last year Japan was an epic pitching environment.

The average pitcher in a AAAA league had a 3.15 ERA. 2.76 is just a smidge better than average there. His ERA+ was 114 in a lesser league. Relative to his league his ERA was essentially the same as Tyler Wells or Bryan Baker, but the quality of competition was lower.

On the Yokohama Bay Stars, a 3rd place team, 74-66, 12 games out of first, he was their 3rd starter.

So, how far out on a limb do you want to go for that?
 

I think if you were trying to find reasons for not signing him, this post should be the reason. All the other stuff, if his teammates are ok with it, will go away if he pitches well, the team wins and the players like him.

But if he’s just not that good anymore, you can avoid signing. Still, for the league minimum or even some kind of NRI type contract, I don’t think it’s some monster risk. You just cut him. 
 

Maybe if he you make him a reliever, he sees a slight uptick in stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

For a minute let's set aside your political opinions.

The Japanese Central League has six teams. Which means they had roughly 30 or 40 starting pitchers. Bauer's ranking among those pitchers:

ERA (min 100 IP): 13th
IP: 16th
H/9: 14th
HR/9: 21st
BB/9: 12th
K/9: 2nd
K/BB: 7th

Summing that up, he was a 2nd or 3rd starter in a league that sits somewhere between AAA and the Majors. And he'll come with a media circus.

People look at his 2.76 ERA and think "oohh.. he's great". But the Central League had a 3.15 ERA. The average pitcher in a AAAA league had a 3.15 ERA. 2.76 is just a smidge better than average there. His ERA+ was 114 in a lesser league. Relative to his league his ERA was essentially the same as Tyler Wells or Bryan Baker, but the quality of competition was lower.

So, how far out on a limb do you want to go for that?
 

LOL it's not a political position. Evolutionary psychologists argue that we’re naturally hardwired to care about women’s suffering more because “eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap.” There's certainly a lot of truth to that, though I'm sure if one considers how most cultures throughout history have treated women, and because it seems to assume a mechanism based in group selection. Whether or not the tendency reflects a rule of human nature, it is unquestionably true that the modern west prioritizes female well-being, and that's a good thing.

Look your points probably do point to some regression for Bauer since he last pitched in the MLB. I'm not really arguing that, but I also think he'd come very cheap (read easy to get rid of if he is a detrimental club-house presence) and frankly I still think his K/9 numbers point to more long-term run prevention when compared to Kremer (who I like but is not really more than a 5th starter), Wells (again, I like, but seems to be more a bullpen piece as he wears down), and Irvin (who is an AAAA guy).

Bradish is out for the year in all likelihood. John Means is on the brink of injuries ending his career as an effective MLB Pitcher.

You have Burnes, G-Rod (injury prone?), Kremer, Irvin, Wells......baking in regression from last year, going to be hard to repeat as AL East champs without MLB proven arms imo.
 

Edited by MDS29
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...